Citations


Contact Us

For Marketing, Sales and Subscriptions Inquiries
Rockefeller Center, 45 Rockefeller Plaza
20th Flr Unit #5, New York, NY 10111
United States

Conference List

International Journal of Business, Economics and Management

February 2021, Volume 8, 2, pp 100-118

Innovation Efforts in the Face of Institutional Obstacles in Latin America

Priscila Rezende da Costa

,

Vitor da Silva Bittencourt

,

Christian Daniel Falaster

,

Luisa Margarida Cagica Carvalho

,

Angelica Pigola

Priscila Rezende da Costa 1 Vitor da Silva Bittencourt 1 Christian Daniel Falaster 1 Luisa Margarida Cagica Carvalho 1 Angelica Pigola 1 ,
;

  1. Universidade Nove de Julho – UNINOVE Rua Vergueiro, Brazil. 1

Pages: 100-118

DOI: 10.18488/journal.62.2021.82.100.118

Share :

Article History:

Received: 12 October, 2020
Revised: 18 November, 2020
Accepted: 01 December, 2020
Published: 14 December, 2020


Abstract:

Among scholars, politicians and practitioners, innovation has become a priority. However, a consensus and convergence have yet to be reached in the literature regarding the factors that determine innovation efforts at the firm level regarding developing countries. Thus, the general aim was to gauge to what extent rapid internationalization and relational triggers enable a potential for innovation efforts in companies from Latin American countries faced with the perception of the gravity of institutional obstacles. In methodological terms, a database of the World Bank (Environment Surveys) was used, with 14,064 companies from 20 Latin American countries, with responses to question related to their innovation efforts. Unprecedented contributions were collected, as this was the first time that the perception of the gravity of institutional obstacles was jointly and empirically evaluated, together with evidence of rapid internationalization and the use of relational triggers, to explain innovation efforts, considering many firms from Latin American companies. This work also provides some clues about the potentializing effect of rapid internationalization in the relationship between institutional obstacles and innovation efforts. The main results allow a better understanding about inter- and intra-group analyses, demonstrating in which groups of Latin American company’s innovation efforts are more significant and distinctive, and therefore require pro-market and pro-internationalization public policies.
Contribution/ Originality
The paper's primary contribution is finding that what extent rapid internationalization and relational triggers potentialize the innovation efforts of Latin American companies regarding the perception of the gravity of institutional obstacles.

Keywords:

Innovation efforts, Institutional obstacles, Rapid internationalization, Relational triggers, Latin American companies, Latin America Keywords.

Reference:

Acs, Z. J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & O’Connor, A. (2017). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 1-10.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8.

Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887-903.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694.

Assink, M. (2006). Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: A conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2), 215- 233.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060610663587.

Ayyagari, M., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2012). Financing of firms in developing countries: Lessons from research. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Baldwin, C., & Von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399-1417.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0618.

Banalieva, E. R., Eddleston, K. A., Jiang, R. J., & Santoro, M. D. (2018). Institutional environment and the mixed gamble of internationalization. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.

Banco, M. (2018). Enterprise surveys. Retrieved from http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/data.

Barasa, L., Knoben, J., Vermeulen, P., Kimuyu, P., & Kinyanjui, B. (2017). Institutions, resources and innovation in East Africa: A firm level approach. Research Policy, 46(1), 280-291.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.008.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

Chae, H.-C., Koh, C. E., & Prybutok, V. R. (2014). Information technology capability and firm performance: Contradictory findings and their possible causes. Mis Quarterly, 38(1), 305-326.Available at: https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2014/38.1.14.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295-336.

Cohen, W. M. (2012). Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1(1), 129-213.

Colvin, J., Blackmore, C., Chimbuya, S., Collins, K., Dent, M., Goss, J., & Seddaiu, G. (2014). In search of systemic innovation for sustainable development: A design praxis emerging from a decade of social learning inquiry. Research Policy, 43(4), 760-771.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.010.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage Publications.

Daniel, E. M., Ward, J. M., & Franken, A. (2014). A dynamic capabilities perspective of IS project portfolio management. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(2), 95-111.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2014.03.001.

Dau, L. A., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2014). To formalize or not to formalize: Entrepreneurship and pro-market institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 668-686.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.05.002.

de-Oliveira, F., & Rodil-Marzábal, Ó. (2019). Structural characteristics and organizational determinants as obstacles to innovation in small developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 306-314.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.021.

Dib, L. A. (2008). The internationalization process of small and medium companies and the global Born phenomenon: Study of the software sector in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.

Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2008). The dynamics of strategic agility: Nokia's rollercoaster experience. California Management Review, 50(3), 95-118.Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166447.

Drasgow, F. (2004). Polychoric and polyserial correlations. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, 9. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Drnevich, P. L., & Kriauciunas, A. P. (2011). Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 32(3), 254-279.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.882.

Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00009-4.

Goedhuys, M., Janz, N., & Mohnen, P. (2014). Knowledge-based productivity in “low-tech” industries: Evidence from firms in developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 1-23.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Multivariate analysis of data. Porto Alegre: Bookman Editora.

Hayes, A. F., & Montoya, A. K. (2017). A tutorial on testing, visualizing, and probing an interaction involving a multicategorical variable in linear regression analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(1), 1-30.

Heimeriks, K., & Schreiner, M. (2002). Alliance capability, collaboration quality, and alliance performance: An integrated framework. Eindhoven, Netherlands: Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.

Hemais, C. A., & Hilal, A. (2002). The internationalization process of the firm according to the Nordic school. The internationalization of Brazilian companies: Studies of international management. Mauad: Rio de Janeiro.

Henderson, R. M., & Newell, R. G. (2011). Introduction and summary to" accelerating energy innovation: Insights from multiple sectors". In Accelerating Energy Innovation: Insights from Multiple Sectors. Chicago, EUA: University of Chicago Press.

Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., & Chicken, E. (2013). Nonparametric statistical methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Hoyle, R. H., & Duvall, J. L. (2004). Determining the number of factors in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In Kaplan, D. The Sage Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Hunt, S. D., Arnett, D. B., & Madhavaram, S. (2006). The explanatory foundations of relationship marketing theory. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 21(2), 72-87.

IBPAD. (2020). Brazilian institute of research and data analysis - Brazilian Institute of Research and Data Analysis - IBPAD, 15 Feb. Retrieved from: https://www.ibpad.com.br/blog/analise-de-dados/linguagem-r-analises-excel-spss/. [Accessed 15 jan. 2020].

Jamrog, J., Vickers, M., & Bear, D. (2006). Building and sustaining a culture that supports innovation. Human Resource Planning, 29(3), 9-20.

Joshi, K. D., Chi, L., Datta, A., & Han, S. (2010). Changing the competitive landscape: Continuous innovation through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 472-495.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0298.

Kanter, R. M. (2009). Knowledge management and organizational design. Washington, DC: Routledge.

Karimi, J., & Walter, Z. (2015). The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: A factor-based study of the newspaper industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1), 39-81.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1029380.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220-246.

Khan, S. U., Shah, A., & Rizwan, M. F. (2019). Do financing constraints matter for technological and non-technological innovation? A (Re) examination of developing markets. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 12(1), 1-28.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1695593.

Lai, J.-H., Chang, S.-C., & Chen, S.-S. (2010). Is experience valuable in international strategic alliances? Journal of International Management, 16(3), 247-261.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.06.004.

Lin, H., & Darnall, N. (2015). Strategic alliance formation and structural configuration. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 549-564.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2053-7.

Machado, F. N. (2009). Internationalization strategies and their results: A case south of Rio-Grandense. Master's Dissertation. Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS.  

Malerba, F., & McKelvey, M. (2018). Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems. Small Business Economics, 54(1), 503–522.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2.

Matos, C. A., Henrique, J. L., & Rosa, F. (2007). The direct, mediating and moderating effects of the cost of change on consumer satisfaction and loyalty. Paper presented at the XXXI Meeting of the National Association of Graduate Studies and Research in Administration. Rio de Janeiro - RJ.

Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2012). Introduction to linear regression analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Oslo, O. M. (2005). Guidelines for collecting and interpreting data on innovation: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 45-64.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490193.

Padilla-Pérez, R., & Gaudin, Y. (2014). Science, technology and innovation policies in small and developing economies: The case of Central America. Research Policy, 43(4), 749-759.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.011.

Pandit, D., Joshi, M. P., Sahay, A., & Gupta, R. K. (2018). Disruptive innovation and dynamic capabilities in emerging economies: Evidence from the Indian automotive sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 323-329.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.035.

Papazoglou, M. E., & Spanos, Y. E. (2018). Bridging distant technological domains: A longitudinal study of the determinants of breadth of innovation diffusion. Research Policy, 47(9), 1713-1728.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.006.

Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198-227.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0094.

Prado, P. H. M., Korelo, J. C., & Da Silva, D. M. L. (2014). Analysis of mediation, moderation and conditional processes. Brazilian Marketing Magazine, 13(4), 04-24.

Rai, A., & Tang, X. (2010). Leveraging IT capabilities and competitive process capabilities for the management of interorganizational relationship portfolios. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 516-542.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0299.

Riaz, M. F., & Cantner, U. (2019). Revisiting the relationship between corruption and innovation in developing and emerging economies. Crime, Law and Social Change, 73(1), 395–416.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-019-09867-0.

Schilke, O., & Goerzen, A. (2010). Alliance management capability: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1192-1219.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310362102.

Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273-292.Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23466005.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.

Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205.

Vassolo, R. S., Anand, J., & Folta, T. B. (2004). Non-additivity in portfolios of exploration activities: A real options-based analysis of equity alliances in biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 25(11), 1045-1061.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.414.

Vieira, V. A., & Faia, V. D. S. (2014). Double and triple moderating effects in the regression analysis. Paper presented at the XXXVIII Anpad Meeting. Rio de Janeiro - RJ.

Walsh, J. P., Lee, Y.-N., & Nagaoka, S. (2016). Openness and innovation in the US: Collaboration form, idea generation and implementation. Research Policy, 45(8), 1660-1671.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.013.

Waltrick, L. P. (2015). Evolution of Brazilian studies on born globals companies in international business scientific publications (Monograph). Florianópolis, SC: University of Southern Santa Catarina.

Wang, J. (2018). Innovation and government intervention: A comparison of Singapore and Hong Kong. Research Policy, 47(2), 399-412.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.008.

World Bank. (2018). World bank open data. World Bank Web. Retrieved from: http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/data.

Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995.

Statistics:

Google Scholor ideas Microsoft Academic Search bing Google Scholor

Funding:

This study received no specific financial support.

Competing Interests:

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgement:

All authors contributed equally to the conception and design of the study.

Related Article

( 1 ) Dynamic Analysis of Competitive Technology Innovation Diffusion Model
( 2 ) Technological Innovation in Central and Eastern Europe: What’s the Contribution of Innovation Policy?
( 3 ) The Moderating Effect of Governance Mechanisms on the Relationship Between Innovation Strategy and the Performance
( 4 ) Measuring and Assessing the State of Technological Innovations and the Level of Interaction between Rice Processors and Stakeholders in Rice Processing Industry in Nigeria
( 5 ) Electronic Banking Innovations and Selected Banks Performance in Nigeria
( 6 ) Innovations Dissemination Approaches among Government Co-Operative Supporting Organisations in Tanzania
( 7 ) Intellectual Property Rights, Human Capital and Innovation in Emerging and Developing Countries
( 8 ) Innovation Strategy and Sustainability of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in South East Nigeria
( 9 ) Non-Linear Effects of Intellectual Property Rights on Technological Innovation: Evidence from Emerging and Developing Countries
( 10 ) A Qualitative Analysis of the Impediments to Business Innovation and Information Management in Nigeria: A Policy Stance
( 11 ) Innovation Efforts in the Face of Institutional Obstacles in Latin America
( 12 ) Analyzing the Impact of Eco-Innovation on Carbon Emissions Abatement: Evidence from OECD Countries
( 13 ) The Role of Social Capital and Social Innovation in Economic Growth
( 14 ) Facing the Challenges of Covid-19 in the Egyptian Banking Sector: The Role of Bricoleurs in Achieving Organizational Innovations via Learning through Improvisation
( 15 ) Perceived Poverty and Alleviation Efforts of Kogi State Community and Social Development Agencies in Kogi State: An Empirical Investigation
( 17 ) Ensuring Quality Provision of Education for All: Discovering Challenges Faced by Teachers of Students with Learning Disabilities in Regular Primary Schools in Masvingo District
( 18 ) Interfaces Between Road Infrastructure and Poverty in Africa: The Case of Malawi, 1994-2013
( 19 ) Exchange Rate and Foreign Reserves Interface: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria
( 20 ) The Impact of Social Media on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence of Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Pinterest
( 22 ) Driving Role of Institutional Investors in the Indian Stock Market in Short and Long-Run – An Empirical Study
( 23 ) Institutionalising and Mainstreaming Policy Analysis Culture in African Environments
( 24 ) Effective Tax Administration and Institutionalization of Accounting Systems in Small and Medium Scale Enterprises: Evidence from Nigeria
( 25 ) Effect of Institutional Factors on Foreign Direct Investment in Nigeria
( 27 ) The Influence of Institutional Voids in the Institutionalization of Bitcoins as a Currency
( 29 ) The Impact of the Decline in Oil Prices in Latin America
( 30 ) Internationalization of State Multilatinas: A Multi-Case Study in The Oil Sector