Contact Us

For Marketing, Sales and Subscriptions Inquiries
Rockefeller Center, 45 Rockefeller Plaza
20th Flr Unit #5, New York, NY 10111
United States

Conference List

Development, Preference Change, and Inequality in an Integrated Walrasian-General-Equilibrium and Neoclassical-Growth Theory

Wei-Bin Zhang

Wei-Bin Zhang 1

  1. Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University 1-1 Jumonjibaru, Beppu-Shi, Oita-ken, Japan 1

on Google Scholar
on PubMed

Pages: 41-55

DOI: 10.18488/journal.26/2015.4.3/

Share :


This study builds a model to analyze dynamic interdependence between economic growth, structural change, inequality in income and wealth, habit formation and preference change in a heterogeneous-households economy. The analytical framework is based on the Walrasian general equilibrium theory and the neoclassical growth theory. We show that the motion of the economy is described by a set of nonlinear differential equations. Analytically, we focus on transitional processes as well as economic equilibrium. For illustration, we simulate the motion of the economic system with three groups. We identify the existence of a unique stable equilibrium point and carry out comparative dynamic analysis with regard to some parameters. We show how, for instance, habit formation of a group affects the dynamic paths of all the variables of the economic system. 
Contribution/ Originality
An original contribution of this paper is the introduction of habit formation and preference change into the integrated Walrasian-general-equilibrium and neoclassical-growth theory recently developed by Zhang. The study examines dynamic relations between economic growth, economic change, and inequality with wealth accumulation and preference change.


Walrasian general equilibrium theory, Neoclassical growth theory, Habit formation and preference, Heterogeneous households, Income and wealth distribution, Economic structure.



  1. Abel, A., 1990. Asset prices under habit formation and catching up with the joneses. American Economic Review, 80(2): 38-42.
  2. Amano, J.D. and T. Laubach, 2004. Implication of habit formation for optimal monetary policy. Journal of Monetay Economics, 51(2): 305-325.
  3. Arrow, K.J. and G. Debreu, 1954. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22(3): 265–290.
  4. Arrow, K.J. and F.H. Hahn, 1971. General competitive analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day, Inc.
  5. Becker, G.S., 1992. Habits, addictions and traditions. Kyklos, 45(3): 327-345.
  6. Becker, G.S. and C.B. Mulligan, 1997. The endogenous determination of time preference. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3): 729-758.
  7. Boldrin, M., L. Christiano and J. Fisher, 2001. Habit persistence, asset returns, and the business cycle. American Economic Review, 91(1): 149-166.
  8. Campbell, J. and J. Cochrane, 1999. By force of habit: A consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 107(2): 205-251.
  9. Chang, W.Y., H.F. Tsai and J.J. Chang, 2011. Endogenous time preference, interest-rate rules, and indeterminacy. The Japanese Economic Review, 62(3): 348-364.
  10. Chao, L.W., H. Szrek, N.S. Pereira and M. Paul, 2009. Time preference and its relationship with age, health, and survival probability. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(1): 1-19.
  11. Corrado, L. and S. Holly, 2011. Multiplicative habit formation and consumption: A note. Economics Letters, 113(2): 116-119.
  12. Deaton, A. and J. Muellbauer, 1980. Economics and consumer behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Debreu, G., 1959. Theory of value. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  14. Dioikitopoulos, E.V. and S. Kalyvitis, 2010. Endogenous time preference and public policy: Growth and fiscal implications. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 14(Supp. 2): 243-257.
  15. Duesenberry, J., 1949. Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  16. Epstein, L.G., 1987. A simple dynaic general equilibrium model. Journal of Economic Theory, 41(1): 68-95.
  17. Epstein, L.G. and J.A. Hynes, 1983. The rate of time preference and dynamic economic analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 91(4): 611-635.
  18. Gómez, M.A., 2008. Fiscal policy, congestion, and endogenous growth. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 10(4): 595-622.
  19. Impicciatore, G., L. Panaccione and F. Ruscitti, 2012. Walras’s theory of capital formation: An intertemporal equilibrium reformation. Journal of Economic Theory, 106(2): 99-118.
  20. Jensen, B.S., P.K. Alsholm, M.E. Larsen and J.M. Jensen, 2005. Dynamic structure, exogeneity, phase portraits, growth paths, and scale and substitution elasticities. Review of International Economics, 13(1): 59-89.
  21. Lise, L. and S. Seitz, 2011. Consumption inequality and intra-household allocations. The Review of Economic Studies, 78(1): 328-355.
  22. Lucas, R.E.J. and N.L. Stokey, 1984. Optimal growth with many consumers. Journal of Economic Theory, 32(1): 139-171.
  23. Lusardi, A., 1996. Permanent income, current income, and consumption: Evidence from two panel data set. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 14(1): 81-90.
  24. Mas-Colell, A., M.D. Whinston and J.R. Green, 1995. Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
  25. Mehra, R. and E. Prescott, 1985. The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15(2): 145-161.
  26. Montesano, A., 2008. A restatement of Walras’ theory of capitalization and money. History of Economics Review, 47(Winter): 86–109.
  27. Olsen, J.A., 1993. Time preference for health gains: An empirical investigation. Health Economics, 2(3): 257-265.
  28. Shi, S. and L.G. Epstein, 1993. Habits and time preference. International Economic Review, 34(1): 61-84.
  29. Storesletten, K., C. Telmer and A. Yaron, 2004. Consumption and risk sharing over the life cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(3): 609-633.
  30. Uzawa, H., 1961. On a two-sector model of economic growth. Review of Economic Studies, 29(1): 47-70.
  31. Uzawa, H., 1968. Time preference, the consumption function, and optimum asset holdings, in value, capital and growth: Papers in honor of Sir John Hicks, edited by Wolfe, J.N. Chicago: Aldine. pp: 485-504.
  32. Walras, L., 1874. Elements of pure economics, translated from the French by W. Jaffé, 1954. London: Allen and Unwin.
  33. Zhang, W.B., 1993. A woman’s labor participation and economic growth: Creativity, knowledge utilization and family preference. Economics Letters, 42(1): 105-110.
  34. Zhang, W.B., 2012. Economic growth with heterogeneous households, gender division of labor, and elastic labor supply. Journal of Income Distribution, 21(2): 15-37.
  35. Zhang, W.B., 2013. Habit formation and preference change in a two-sector growth model with elastic labor supply. Academica Science Journal: Economica Series, 1(2): 3-20.


Google Scholor ideas Microsoft Academic Search bing Google Scholor


Competing Interests:


Related Article