Contact Us

2637 E Atlantic Blvd #43110
Pompano Beach, FL 33062 
USA
Email: editor@conscientiabeam.com
Tel. +15184073707
Fax: +1-877-881-2035

Conference List

Journal of Sports Research

June 2016, Volume 3, 2, pp 56-72

Identity in Australia: A Case Study on the Role of Sport in the Ego Identity Formation Process

Jade Ward, Steve Georgakis

Jade Ward 1 ,

Steve Georgakis 1 
  1. Sydney University, Australia 1

on Google Scholar
on PubMed

Pages: 56-72

DOI: 10.18488/journal.90/2016.3.2/90.2.56.72

Share :


Abstract:

This study explored how sport in Australia contributes to and informs the ego identity formation of an individual. A single female participant between the ages of 18 and 25 years participated in a series of interviews. The participant was selected on the basis of their chosen career path (i.e. PD/H/PE teaching) and their constant involvement in sport. Data collected from the interviews was analysed using grounded theory, principles of constant comparative analysis. Findings from the study indicate that identity is a single, multidimensional structure comprised of interrelated dimensions. In addition, further key findings indicate that sports act as a vehicle for individuals to ‘perform’ their identity to society. Through processes of self-enhancement and protection individuals protect their identity from threats, maintaining or enhancing the value placed upon it by others. Their choice of self-enhancement or protection and the consequent behaviour is determined by their self-concept (determined by social comparison) and societal values. The implications of this study lie with those in the education and sporting industries. Sport programs need to be positive, enjoyable and allow students to experience self-determination for optimal identity development and efficient function in society.

Contribution/ Originality

Keywords:

Ego identity, Australia, Sport, Erikson, Psychosocial stage development theory, Ego identity theory, Australian social landscape, Identity configurations, Identity achievement.

Reference:

  1. Arnett, J.J., 2000. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5): 469-480.
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006. Australian social trends, 2006: Social participation of young people. Available from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS.
  3. Bailey, R., 2006. Physical education and sport in schools: A review of benefits and outcomes. Journal of School Health, 76(8): 397-401.
  4. Berzonsky, M.D., 2005. Ego identity: A personal standpoint in a postmodern world. Identity. An International Journal of Theory and Research, 5(2): 125-136.
  5. Bosma, H.A. and E.S. Kunnen, 2001. Identity-in-context is not yet development-in-context. Journal of Adolescence, 31: 281-289.
  6. Brettschneider, W. and R. Heim, 2001. Identity, sport and youth development. In K. Fox (Ed.), The physical self: From motivation to well-being. United States of America: Human Kinetics. pp: 205-227.
  7. Cashman, R., 1995. Paradise of sport: The rise of organised sport in Australia. Australia: Oxford University Press.
  8. Cote, J., 2006. Identity studies: How close are we to developing a social science of identity? – an appraisal of the field. Identity. An international Journal of Theory and Research, 6(1): 3-25.
  9. Creswell, J.W., 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. California: Sage Publications.
  10. Crotty, M., 1998. Foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. NSW: Allen & Unwin.
  11. Danielsen, L.M., A.E. Lorem and J. Kroger, 2000. The impact of social context on the identity-formation process of norwegian late adolescents. Youth and Society, 31(3): 332-362.
  12. Danish, S.J., A.J. Petitpas and B.D. Hale, 1990. Sport as a context for developing competence. In T. D. Gullotta, G. R. Adams, & R. R. Montemayor (Eds.) Developing social competency in adolescence. Newbury Park, California: Sage. pp: 169-194.
  13. Dey, I., 1999. Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego: Academic Press.
  14. Erikson, E., 1950. Childhood and society. London: Imago.
  15. Erikson, E., 1971. Identity: Youth and crisis. England: Faber & Faber.
  16. Georgakis, S. and R. Light, 2005. The athens of the South: Sport in Australian society. Modern Greek Studies (Australia and New Zealand), 13: 58-74.
  17. Gratton, C. and I. Jones, 2004. Resrach methods for sports studies. London: Routledge.
  18. Grove, R.J., M. Fish and R.C. Eklund, 2004. Changes in athletic identity following team selection: Self-protection versus self-enhancement. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16(1): 75-81.
  19. Hitlin, S., 2003. Values as the core of personality identity: Drawing links between two theories of self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(2): 118-137.
  20. Kroger, J., 2004. Identity in formation. In K. Hoover (Ed.), The Future of Identity: Centennial reflections on the legacy of Erik Erikson. United States of America: Lexington Books. pp: 61-76.
  21. Marcia, J., 1966. Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5): 551-558.
  22. National Australia Day Council, 2010. Award recipients. Available from http://www.australianoftheyear.org.au.
  23. Percy, V.E., 2007. Understanding identity and psychosocial functioning through the lived experiences of African American collegiate athlete’ participating in revenue producing sports: A hermeneutic phenomenological approach. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(12-A).
  24. Rattansi and Phoenix, 1997. Rethinking youth identities: Modernist and postmodernist frameworks. In J. Bynner, L. Chisholm, & A. Furlong (Eds.). Youth, citizenship and social change in a European context. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate. pp: 121-150.
  25. Reid, P.T., 2002. Multicultural psychology: Bringing together gender and ethnicity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8(2): 103-114.
  26. Schachter, E.P., 2004. Identity configurations: A new perspective on identity formation in contemporary society. Journal of Personality, 71(1): 167-197.
  27. Schachter, E.P., 2005. Context and identity formation: A theoretical analysis and a case study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20(3): 375-395.
  28. Schwartz, S.J., 2001. The evolution of eriksonian and neo-eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity. An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1(1): 7-58.
  29. Schwartz, S.J., 2007. The structure of identity consolidation: Multiple correlated constructs or one superordinate construct? Identity. An International Journal of Theory and Research, 7(1): 27-49.
  30. Seidman, I., 1998. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
  31. Shaw, S.M., D.A. Kleiber and L.L. Caldwell, 1995. Leisure and identity0 formation in male and female adolescence: A preliminary examination. Journal of Leisure Research, 27(3): 245-263.
  32. Sollod, R.N., J.P. Wilson and C.F. Monte, 2009. Beneath the mask: An introduction to theories of personality. Hoboken, N J: John Wiley & Sons.
  33. Stephen, Y. and B.W. Brewer, 2007. Perceived determinants of identification with the athlete role among elite competitors. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19(1): 67-79.
  34. Stets, J.E. and P.J. Bourke, 2000. Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3): 224-237.
  35. Stryker, S., 1968. Identity salience and role performance. Journal of Marriage and Family, 4: 558-564.
  36. Tajfel, H., 1978. Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
  37. Weiten, W., 2007. Psychology: Themes and variations. California: Thomson/Wadsworth.
  38. Willig, C., 2008. Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. New York: Open University Press.
  39. Yakushko, O., M.M. Davidson and E.N. Williams, 2009. Identity salience model: A paradigm for integrating multiple identities in clinical practice. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46(2): 180-192.

Statistics:

Google Scholor ideas Microsoft Academic Search bing Google Scholor

Funding:

This study received no specific financial support.

Competing Interests:

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgement:

All authors contributed equally to the conception and design of the study.

Related Article