Citations


Contact Us

For Marketing, Sales and Subscriptions Inquiries
2637 E Atlantic Blvd #43110
Pompano Beach, FL 33062
USA

Conference List

Quarterly Journal of Econometrics Research

June 2019, Volume 5, 1, pp 1-16

Purchasing Power Parity Hold in Major SAARC Countries? Panel Cointegration Analysis

Rashid Mehmood

,

Muhammad Zeeshan Younas

Rashid Mehmood 1

Muhammad Zeeshan Younas 2

  1. M.Phil Graduate, COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan. 1

  2. PhD Scholar, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan. 2

Pages: 1-16

DOI: 10.18488/journal.88.2019.51.1.16

Share :

Article History:

Received: 04 July, 2019
Revised: 07 August, 2019
Accepted: 09 September, 2019
Published: 02 October, 2019


Abstract:

In an effort to provide a better understanding of the large variation in price levels between countries, this paper examines the validity of the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis using monthly data of SAARC countries over the period of 2000-2017. We utilized four econometric tests to examine the existence of this hypothesis in the understudy region. Panel results show that PPP seems to be moderately held in a panel of SAARC, while in the country by country analysis we find partial support of PPP for all economies. We also find that the price and exchange rate have a long-run relationship while ECM analysis shows that the exchange rate and price differential are correlated in the short run, and price and exchange rate have bidirectional causality relationship. In addition, the dummy variable analysis shows that the Global Financial Crisis 2007-08 significantly affect the SAARC countries exchange rate in terms of depreciation. However, these types of external shocks do not have any permanent effect on the real exchange rate and other things remaining the same, no active policy intervention is warranted for the sustainability of external balance.
Contribution/ Originality
This contributes to the existing literature by estimating the long-run parameters and short-run dynamics to check the speed of adjustments towards the long-run equilibrium.

Keywords:

Purchasing power parity, Nominal exchange rate, Cointegration, SAARC.

Reference:

Ahmed, M., 2005. Purchasing power parity based on capital account, exchange rate volatility and cointegration: Evidence from some developing countries. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 5(3): 1-12.

Arize, A.C., J. Malindretos and D. Ghosh, 2015. Purchasing power parity-symmetry and proportionality: Evidence from 116 countries. International Review of Economics & Finance, 37: 69-85.

Bahmani, O.M., T. Chang and T.-P. Wu, 2015. Purchasing power parity in transition countries: Panel stationary test with smooth and sharp breaks. International Journal of Financial Studies, 3(2): 153-161.Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs3020153.

Bhatti, R.H., 2000. On purchasing power parity between Pakistan and other Asian countries. Pakistan Economic and Social Review: 1-15.

Cassel, G., 1916. The present situation of the foreign exchanges. The Economic Journal, 26(101): 62-65.Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2222038.

Chang, H.-L., C.-W. Su, M.-N. Zhu and P. Liu, 2010. Long-run purchasing power parity and asymmetric adjustment in BRICs. Applied Economics Letters, 17(11): 1083-1087.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840902817458.

Chang, T., C.W. Su and C.H. Lee, 2012. Purchasing power parity nonlinear threshold unit root test for East-Asian countries. Applied Economics Letters, 19(10): 975-979.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2011.608641.

Chortareas, G. and G. Kapetanios, 2009. Getting PPP right: Identifying mean-reverting real exchange rates in panels. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(2): 390-404.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.08.010.

Cuestas, J.C. and P.J. Regis, 2013. Purchasing power parity in OECD countries: Nonlinear unit root tests revisited. Economic Modelling, 32: 343-346.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.01.035.

Dimitriou, D. and T. Simos, 2013. Testing purchasing power parity for Japan and the US: A structural-break approach. Japan and the World Economy, 28: 53-59.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2013.07.001.

Enders, W. and P.L. Siklos, 2001. Cointegration and threshold adjustment. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 19(2): 166-176.

Gregory, A.W. and B.E. Hansen, 1996. Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 70(1): 99-126.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(69)41685-7.

Harvey, D.I., S.J. Leybourne and B. Xiao, 2008. A powerful test for linearity when the order of integration is unknown. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 12(3): 1-24.Available at: https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1582.

He, H. and T. Chang, 2013. Purchasing power parity in transition countries: Sequential panel selection method. Economic Modelling, 35: 604-609.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.08.021.

Hoque, A. and R. Banerjee, 2014. The stationarity of South Asian real exchange rates allowing for structural breaks. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 8(3): 45-54.Available at: https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v8i3.4.

Im, K.S., M.H. Pesaran and Y. Shin, 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1): 53-74.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7.

Janjua, S.A. and E. Ahmad, 2006. Tests of purchasing power parity for South Asian countries. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 44(2): 235-243.

Kao, C., 1999. Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1): 1-44.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00023-2.

Kasman, S., A. Kasman and D. Ayhan, 2010. Testing the purchasing power parity hypothesis for the new member and candidate countries of the European Union: Evidence from lagrange multiplier unit root tests with structural breaks. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 46(2): 53-65.

Khan, M.A. and A. Qayyum, 2007. Exchange rate determination in Pakistan: Evidence based on purchasing power parity theory. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 45(2): 181-202.

Kim, H. and Y.-K. Moh, 2010. A century of purchasing power parity confirmed: The role of nonlinearity. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(7): 1398-1405.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.03.014.

Kruse, R., 2011. A new unit root test against ESTAR based on a class of modified statistics. Statistical Papers, 52(1): 71-85.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-009-0204-1.

Lee, J. and M.C. Strazicich, 2004. Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break. Working Papers 04-17, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.

McCoskey, S. and C. Kao, 1999. Testing the stability of a production function with urbanization as a shift factor. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1): 671-690.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1671.

Munir, Q. and S.C. Kok, 2015. Purchasing power parity of ASEAN-5 countries revisited: Heterogeneity, structural breaks and cross-sectional dependence. Global Economic Review, 44(1): 116-149.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508x.2015.1012091.

Papell, D.H. and R. Prodan, 2006. Additional evidence of long-run purchasing power parity with restricted structural change. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 38(5): 1329-1349.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2006.0073.

Pedroni, P., 1999;2004. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1): 653-670.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653.

Phillips, P.C. and B.E. Hansen, 1990. Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with i (1) processes. The Review of Economic Studies, 57(1): 99-125.

Rashid, A., 2013. Financial crisis and exchange rates in emerging economies. Business and Economic Horizons, 9(4): 86-96.Available at: https://doi.org/10.15208/beh.2013.24.

Sollis, R., 2009. A simple unit root test against asymmetric STAR nonlinearity with an application to real exchange rates in Nordic countries. Economic Modelling, 26(1): 118-125.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2008.06.002.

Taylor, M.P., 1988. An empirical examination of long-run purchasing power parity using cointegration techniques. Applied Economics, 20(10): 1369-1381.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036848800000107.

Ucar, N. and T. Omay, 2009. Testing for unit root in nonlinear heterogeneous panels. Economics Letters, 104(1): 5-8.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.03.018.

Yahya, M.H., A. Bany-Ariffin and A.R.A. HADI, 2011. Revisiting the test of purchasing power parity and structural breaks of East Asian countries. International Journal of Economics and Management, 5(1): 333-350.

Yunus, M., 2000. The validity of long-run purchasing power parity in the South Asian countries. Bangladesh Development Studies, 26(1): 99-124.

Zhou, S., M. Bahmani-Oskooee and A.M. Kutan, 2008. Purchasing power parity before and after the Adoption of the Euro. Review of World Economics, 144(1): 134-150.

Statistics:

Google Scholor ideas Microsoft Academic Search bing Google Scholor

Funding:

This study received no specific financial support.

Competing Interests:

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgement:

Both authors contributed equally to the conception and design of the study.

Related Article

( 1 ) Green Products Purchasing Among Malaysian Consumers
( 2 ) Purchasing Power Parity Hold in Major SAARC Countries? Panel Cointegration Analysis
( 3 ) Strategic Evaluation of Distributed Power Generation Technology: A Sustainable Approach
( 4 ) Improved Performance Through Empowerment of Small Industry
( 7 ) The Nexus between Financial Crisis and Household Consumption: Evidence from Emerging Countries
( 8 ) The Impact of Dividend Policy on Shareholders’ Wealth before and After Financial Melt down: Evidence from FMCG Sector in India
( 9 ) Examining Long Run Relationship between Household Debt and Household Savings in South Africa – An Error Correction Model and Granger Causality
( 11 ) Food Security Amongst Small Grains and Long Grains Smallholder Farmers of Masvingo Province in Zimbabwe
( 12 ) Relevance of Stakeholders Theory, Organizational Identity Theory and Social Exchange Theory to Corporate Social Responsibility and Employees Performance in the Commercial Banks in Nigeria
( 13 ) Measuring and Assessing the State of Technological Innovations and the Level of Interaction between Rice Processors and Stakeholders in Rice Processing Industry in Nigeria
( 14 ) Correlation between Financial Difficulties and Financing Strategies among Market Stallholders in Batangas City
( 18 ) Study of the Relationship between Economic Growth and Inflation: Application to the Countries of the South Side of the Mediterranean: A Panel Data Approach
( 19 ) Panel Data Analysis of the Impact of Economic Freedom as Well as Economic Conditions, The Quality of Life, and Public Education Spending on U.S. Undocumented Immigrant Settlement Patterns
( 21 ) Effect of Budget Defict on Private Investment in East African Community for the Period 1981-2015: A Panel Data Analysis
( 22 ) Public Sector Size and GDP Growth Nexus: Panel Data Estimation
( 23 ) An Empirical Investigation into the Key Drivers of Economic Performance in the CEMAC Zone: A Panel Corrected Standard Errors Approach
( 25 ) The Effects of Exchange Rate Variability on Trade Flows in Nigeria: A Cointegration Analysis
( 26 ) New Evidence on the Link Between Income Inequality and Misery Index: A Nonlinear Time Series Analysis
( 27 ) Geographical Starting Points the Analysis of Current Rural Problems in Montenegro: Case Study of Rural Local Community Kralje
( 28 ) Institutionalising and Mainstreaming Policy Analysis Culture in African Environments
( 29 ) Profit And Loss Sharing As an Offshoot for Bank Stability: A Comparative Analysis
( 30 ) The Effect of Selected Financial Ratios on Profitability: An Empirical Analysis of Listed Firms of Cement Sector in Saudi Arabia
( 31 ) Benefit-Cost Analysis of Alternative Insect Pests Management in Cashew and Mango Orchards in Tanzania
( 32 ) Comparative Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Milk Production Systems in Uasin Gishu County of Kenya
( 33 ) An Analysis of Purchase Behavior of Generation Y in Kenya
( 34 ) Dynamic Analysis of Competitive Technology Innovation Diffusion Model
( 35 ) Causal Relationship between Imports and Economic Growth in Zimbabwe: An Empirical Analysis 1975 – 2013
( 36 ) Measuring Efficiency in Banks: A Brief Survey on Non – Parametric Technique (Data Envelopment Analysis)
( 37 ) A Theoretical Analysis Upon the Environmental Health and Justice Issue: A Case Study for a Comparison Between G20s Unitary and Federal Members
( 38 ) Decoupling Analysis of Bulgaria’s Agriculture
( 39 ) A Factor Analysis Approach Towards a Study of the Factors Affecting Students’ Choice of Higher Education Institution: A Case Study of a Private Institution (Twintech International University College of Technology)
( 41 ) Dynamics of Inflation, Economic Growth, Money Supply and Exchange Rate in India: Evidence from Multivariate Analysis
( 43 ) Specifying Quality of Governance in Transition Economies with Cluster Analysis
( 45 ) Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Coub-Douglas, Real Business Cycle, and Keynsian Growth Models in Determining Economic Growth in Nigeria
( 46 ) China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): Analysis of Internal and External Challenges