Contact Us

For Marketing, Sales and Subscriptions Inquiries
2637 E Atlantic Blvd #43110
Pompano Beach, FL 33062
USA

Conference List

Contracting Out: What Works, What Doesn’t and Why?

Tawanda Zinyama

Tawanda Zinyama 1

  1. Department of Political and Administrative Studies, University of Zimbabwe, Mount Pleasant, Zimbabwe 1

on Google Scholar
on PubMed

Abstract:

Contracting out, as an economic policy instrument, began to gain attractiveness in both developed and developing countries following the apparent successful results in United Kingdom and United States.  The rhythm of contracting out in Sub-Saharan Africa has increased in order to enhance service delivery. The purpose of this study is to give a critical review of the theoretical framework of contracting out.  The specific objectives include: to examine major extant and/or evolving contracting out theoretical paradigms and their relevance to the public sector management; challenges encountered in contracting out and factors influencing successful contracting out. The review discusses gaps in the literature and the directions in which future studies may address these gaps.
Contribution/ Originality
The paper critically reviewed the contracting out theoretical framework specifically focusing on the strengths and weaknesses of each theory. The gaps in the literature were indentified and the directions future studies should address were outlined. The institutional and capacity issues have been identified. It also exposed the critical need for capacity within the government to develop and monitor contracts.

Keywords:


Reference:

  1. Adam Smith, 1776. The wealth of nations. New York: P.F. Collier and Son Company, 1990-14. Available from http://www.bartleby.com/10/ [Accessed 20 May 2014].
  2. Alchian, A.A. and H. Demsetz, 1972. Production, information costs and economic organisation. American Economic Review, Washington DC, LXII(7): 777-795.
  3. Arrow, K.J., 1985. The economics of agency, in principals and agents: The structure of American business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  4. Barney, J.B. and W. Hesterly, 2005. Organisational economics: Understanding the relationship between organisations and economic analysis. In Clegg, S. R. and Hardy, C. (ed.) Studying organization: Theory and method. London: SAGE Publication.
  5. Barney, J.B. and W.G. Ouchi, 1986. Organisational economics: Toward a new paradigm for understanding and studying organisations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  6. Bouin, O. and C.-A. Michalet, 1991. Rebalancing the public and private sectors: Developing country experience. Paris: Development Centre, OECD.
  7. Boyne, G.A., 1998. Bureaucratic theory meets reality: Public choice and service contracting in US local government. Public Administration Review, 58(6): 474-484.
  8. Brown, T.L., 2001. Contracting out by local governments in transitioning nations: The role of technical assistance in Ukraine. Administration and society. New York: Sage Publications.
  9. Buchanan, J., D. Tollison and G. Tullock, 1980. Toward a theory of rent-seeking society, college station. Texas: A and M University.
  10. Buchanan, J.M., 1978. The economics of politics. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
  11. Buchanan, J.M., 1987. The constitution of economic policy. Stockholm: Nobel Foundation.
  12. Butt, H. and B. Palmer, 1985. Value for money: In the public sector: The decision-maker’s guide. UK: Basil Blackwell.
  13. Coase, R.H., 1937; 1972. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(2): 386-405.
  14. Coase, R.H., 1972. Industrial organisation: A proposal for research, in policy issues and research opportunities in industrial organisation. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  15. Conner, K.R., 1991. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organisation economics: Do we have a theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17(3): 121-154.
  16. Cook, P. and C. Kirkpatrick, 1988. Privatisation in less developed countries. Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books.
  17. Eisenhardt, K.M., 1985. Control: Organisational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31(1): 134-149.
  18. Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 57-74.
  19. Fama, E.F. and M.C. Jensen, 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(9): 301-326.
  20. Ferris, J.M., 1986. The decision to contract out: An empirical analysis. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22(2): 289-311.
  21. Freeman, J. and M. Minow, 2009. Reframing the outsourcing debates. In Freeman, J. and Minow, M. (Eds), Government by contract: Outsourcing and American democracy. London: Harvard University Press.
  22. Germa, B., X. Fageda and M.E. Warner, 2010. Is private production of public services cheaper than the public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(3): 553-577.
  23. Granovetter, M., 1985. Economic action and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 91(7): 276-299.
  24. Grindle, M.S. and J.W. Thomas, 1991. Public choices and policy change: The political economy of reform in developing countries. Baltimore/London: The Johns Hopkins Press.
  25. Hirsch, P.M., R. Friedman and M.P. Koza, 1990. Collaboration or paradigm shift? Caveat emptor and the risk of romance with economic models for the strategy and policy research. Organisation Science, 1(2): 87-98.
  26. Hirsch, W.Z., 1995a. Factors important in local government’s privatisation decisions. Urban Affairs Review, 31(2): 226-243.
  27. Hirsch, W.Z., 1995b. Contracting out by urban governments. Urban Affairs Review, 30(3): 458-472.
  28. Hood, C., 1995. Contemporary public management: A new global paradigm. Public Policy and Administrative, 10(2): 104-117.
  29. Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling, 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(2): 305-360.
  30. Jones, G.P. and C.W.L. Hill, 1988. Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6): 159-172.
  31. Kamarck, E., 2007. The end of government as we know it. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
  32. Kikeri, S., J. Nellis and M. Shirely, 1992. Privatisation: The lessons of experience. Washington D.C: The World Bank.
  33. Kogut, B. and U. Zander, 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organisation Science, 3(2): 383-397.
  34. Lane, J.E., 1993. The public sector: Concepts, models and approaches. London: Sage.
  35. Lavery, K., 1999. Smart contracting for local government services: Processes and experiences. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  36. Mahoney, J.T., 1992. The choice of organisational form: Vertical financial ownership versus other methods of vertical integration. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5): 559-584.
  37. March, J.P. and J. Olsen, 1989. Rediscovering institutions: The organisational basis of politics. New York: The Free Press.
  38. Moe, T.M., 1991. Politics and the theory of organisation. Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation, 7(5): 106-130.
  39. Mueller, D., 1989. Public choice II. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Obadan, M.I., 2008. The economic and social impact of privatisation of state-owned enterprises in Africa. Dakar: CODESRIA Green Book Series.
  41. Outsourcing Institute, 1998. Survey of current and potential outsourcing end-users. The Outsourcing Institute, 2(1): 123-151.
  42. Parsons, J., 1960. Structure and process in modern societies. New York: The Free Press.
  43. Perrow, C., 1986. Complex organisations: A critical theory. 3rd Edn., New York: Random House.
  44. Rehfuss, 1993. Cited in Sansom, K.R., R.W.A.F. Franceys, J. Morales-Reyes and C. Njiru (2003). Contracting out water and sanitation services, case studies and analysis of service and management contracts in developing countries. WEDC: Lough Borough University, UK, 2.
  45. Sansom, K.R., R.W.A.F. Franceys, J. Morales-Reyes and C. Njiru, 2003. Contracting out water and sanitation services, case studies and analysis of service and management contracts in developing countries. WEDC: Lough Borough University, UK, 2.
  46. Savas, E., 1974. Municipal monopolies versus competition in delivering urban services. In W. Haley and D. Rogers (Eds), Improving the quality of urban management. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  47. Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny, 1994. Politicians and firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 10(2): 134-149.
  48. Simon, H.A., 1947. Administrative behaviour. New York: Free Press.
  49. Stein, R.M., 1990. Urban alternatives: Public and private markets in the provision of local services. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  50. Stoker, G., 1997. Conclusion: Privatisation, urban government and the citizen. In D Lorrain and G. Stoker (Eds), The privatisation of urban services in Europe. London: Pinter.
  51. Sundell, A. and V. Lapuente, 2012. Adam Smith or Machiavelli? Political incentives for contracting out local public services. Springer Science + Business Media, 153(4): 469-485. DOI 10. 1007/s 11127-011-9803-1.
  52. The Economist Farming out the Farm, 1994. 5 March, 2(3): 34-57.
  53. Turner, M. and D. Hulme, 1997. Governance, administration and development: Making the state work. New York: Palgrave.
  54. Weimer, D. and A. Vining, 1992. Policy analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  55. Williamson, O.E., 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
  56. Williamson, O.E., 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.
  57. Williamson, O.E., 1991b. Strategising, economising and economic organisation. Strategic Management Journal, 12c(Special Winter): 75-94.
  58. Williamson, O.E., 1993a. Comparative economic organisation: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. In Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4): 269-296.

Statistics:

Google Scholor ideas Microsoft Academic Search bing Google Scholor

Funding:

Competing Interests:

Acknowledgement:


Related Article