Contact Us

For Marketing, Sales and Subscriptions Inquiries
2637 E Atlantic Blvd #43110
Pompano Beach, FL 33062

Conference List

Reduction of the Carbon Footprint in Agricultural Greenhouses

John Vourdoubas

John Vourdoubas 1

  1. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Engineering, Technological Educational Institute of Crete, Chania, Crete, Greece 1

on Google Scholar
on PubMed

Pages: 1-8

DOI: 10.18488/journal.70/2017.4.1/

Share :

Article History:

Received: 06 December, 2016
Revised: 05 January, 2017
Accepted: 13 January, 2017
Published: 21 January, 2017


Climate change in the planet is currently creating many environmental, economic and social problems which are probably going to multiply in the near future. Reduction of greenhouse gases emitted from fossil fuels could result in the mitigation of greenhouse effect and the climate change. Agricultural greenhouses consume large amounts of energy mainly derived from fossil fuels, for the cultivation of various crops. Reduction of their carbon footprint is of primary importance to day. In order to investigate the possibilities of reducing their carbon footprint, the energy consumption during their operation has been estimated and the sustainable energy technologies which could be used for substitution of fossil fuels used have been analyzed. It has been found that a modern greenhouse located in Mediterranean region with a covered area of 1,000 m2 and a total annual energy consumption of 200 KWh/m2 emits 76,900 kg CO2 per year. Total elimination of their CO2 emissions could be achieved with the investment of 44,000 € in renewable energy technologies, including solid biomass for heating and solar-PV for power generation and resulting in lower energy cost during their operation. The payback time of the abovementioned investments has been estimated at 4.84 years.
Contribution/ Originality
The study contributes in the existing literature regarding the improvement of the sustainability in agricultural greenhouses.  It indicates the possibility of using various renewable energy sources instead of fossil fuels for covering their energy requirements resulting in zeroing their CO2 emissions due to energy use in them.


Agricultural greenhouses, Carbon footprint, CO2 emissions, Energy consumption, Energy saving, Renewable energy.



  1. Bailey, B.J., 1981. The reduction of thermal radiation in glasshouses by thermals screens. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Resources, 26(3): 215-224. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  2. Banaeian, N., M. Omid and H. Ahmadi, 2011. Energy and economic analysis of greenhouse strawberry production in Tehran Province of Iran. Energy Conversion and Management, 52(2): 1020-1025.View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  3. Bibbiani, C., F. Fantozzi, C. Gergari, C.A. Campiotti, E. Schettini and G. Vox, 2016. Wood biomass as sustainable energy for greenhouses heating in Italy. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8: 637-645. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  4. Bredenbeck, H., 1992. The use of waste heat from a power plant for greenhouse heating in commercial application in Germany. Acta Horticulturae, 312: 29-36. View at Publisher
  5. Canakci, M. and J. Akinci, 2006. Energy use pattern analyses of greenhouse vegetable production. Energy, 31(8): 1243-1256. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  6. Djevic, M. and A. Dimitrijevic, 2009. Energy efficiency for different greenhouse constructions. Energy, 34(9): 1325-1331. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  7. Hatirli, S.A., B. Ozkan and C. Fert, 2006. Energy inputs and crops yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production. Renewable Energy, 31(4): 427-438. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  8. Heidari, M.D. and M. Omid, 2011. Energy use patterns and econometric models of major greenhouse vegetable productions in Iran. Energy, 36(1): 220-225. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  9. Mohhamadi, A. and M. Omid, 2010. Economic analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran. Applied Energy, 87(1): 191-196. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  10. Ozkan, B., A. Kurklu and H. Akcaoz, 2004. An input-output energy analysis in greenhouse vegetable production: A case study for Antalya region in Turkey. Biomass and Bioenergy, 26(1): 89-95. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  11. Perry, S., J. Klemes and I. Bulatov, 2008. Integrating waste and renewable energy to reduce the carbon footprint of locally integrated energy sectors. Energy, 33(10): 1489-1497. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  12. Sanford, S., 2011. Reducing greenhouse energy consumption-an overview energy efficiency in greenhouses. University of Wisconsin-Madison ( A3907-01). Retrieved from [Accessed 28/11/2016].
  13. Sgroi, F., S. Tudisca, A.M. Di Trapani, R. Testa and R. Squatrito, 2014. Efficacy and efficiency of Italian energy policy : The case of PV systems in greenhouse farms. Energies, 7(6): 3985-4001. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  14. Tantau, H.J., 1998. Energy saving potential of greenhouse climate control. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 48(1): 93-101. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  15. Vourdoubas, J., 2015. Economic and environmental assessment of the use of renewable energies in greenhouses: A case study in crete-Greece. Journal of Agricultural Science, 7(10): 48-57.View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  16. Vourdoubas, J., 2015. Overview of heating greenhouses with renewable energy sources. A case study in crete-Greece. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 4(1): 70-76. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  17. Vourdoubas, J., 2016. Overview of the use of sustainable energies in agricultural greenhouses. Journal of Agricultural Science, 8(3): 36-43. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  18. Zhang , Y., I. Gauthier, D. De Halleux, B. Dansereau and A. Gosselin, 1996. Effect of covering materials on energy consumption and greenhouse microclimate. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 82(1-4): 227-244.View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher


Google Scholor ideas Microsoft Academic Search bing Google Scholor


This study received no specific financial support.

Competing Interests:

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


Related Article

( 1 ) Climate Relevant Emissions from Animal Production and Reduction Potentials
( 2 ) Monosex Barb (Osteochilus Hasselti ) Culture with Reduction Feed on Economic Efficiency and Cost Reduction at Net Cage in Cirata Reservoir
( 3 ) Reduction of the Carbon Footprint in Agricultural Greenhouses
( 4 ) Effect of Carbon Monoxide on Active Oxygen Metabolism of Postharvest Jujube
( 5 ) Bioaccumulation of Hydrocarbon, Heavy Metals and Minerals in Tympanotonus Fuscatus from Coastal Region of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
( 7 ) Principal Component Analysis for the Quantification of Soil Horizon Carbon Stocks in Relation to Soil Bulk Density
( 8 ) Carbon Sequestration Assessment of Selected Campus Champion Trees
( 10 ) Agricultural Dualism, Wage Inequality and Development Policies
( 11 ) Perception of Gender Mainstreaming in Agricultural Extension in Fogera Woreda, Amhara Region, Ethiopia
( 12 ) Awareness about E-Learning among Agricultural Research Scholars of Banaras Hindu University
( 13 ) Olfactory Response of an Assassin Bug, Rhynocoris Longifrons (Insecta: Hemiptera: Reduviidae) To the Hexane Extracts of Different Agricultural Insect Pests
( 14 ) Technical Efficiency of Swamp Rice Farmers in Ebonyi South Agricultural Zone, Ebonyi State, Nigeria
( 15 ) Perception of Kogi State University Agricultural Students on Farming as a Career
( 17 ) A New Activity in Turkey's Agricultural Forestry: Truffle Mushroom Cultivation
( 18 ) Accelerating Agricultural Productivity to Enhance Economic Growth in Botswana
( 19 ) Agric Financing and its Impact on Agricultural GDP: An ARDL Approach
( 20 ) The Relationship between Food Production, Agricultural Land, Rice Production, and Rice Price: An Empirical Study on Thailand and Viet Nam