Export to

Contact Us

For Marketing, Sales and Subscriptions Inquiries
2637 E Atlantic Blvd #43110
Pompano Beach, FL 33062
USA

Conference List

Journal of Empirical Studies

March 2015, Volume 2, 1, pp 1-16

Workplace Bullying: Modelling Construct Validity in an Australian Public Sector Workforce

Joanne Bradbury

,

Marie Hutchinson

Joanne Bradbury 1

Marie Hutchinson 2

  1. Lecturer and Research Fellow, School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Australia 1

  2. Associate Professor of Nursing, School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Australia 2

Pages: 1-16

DOI: 10.18488/journal.66/2015.2.1/66.1.1.16

Share :

View Citation
725Views
Create Citation Alert

Abstract:

Background: Measuring workplace bullying is a challenge as different workforces have different issues.  Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the construct validity and reliability of a Workplace Bullying Inventory (WBI) that was originally derived and validated in a nursing workforce in a broader sample of the Australian public sector workforce. Method: A two-stage procedure was employed with a large sample of volunteer public sector workforce union members (n=1,508), randomly split in two halves. The first sample (n=754) was analysed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the second sample (n=754) through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using MPlus. The WBI consisted of 20 items related to bullying behaviours; 17 of which we had previously validated for use in an Australian nursing workforce. An additional 3 items were included from other workforce bullying scales in order to enhance the generalizability of the scale to a wider workforce. Results: The final model, identified in sample 1 and validated in sample 2 (CFA), best represented workplace bullying as three reliable first-order factors, together loading 13 items; Social Intimidation with 6 items (α = 0.88), Personal Attack with 4 (α = 0.84) and Attack through Work Tasks with 3 items (α= 0.85).  Discussion: The modelling demonstrates that workplace bullying is a complex construct, consisting of multiple factors. The original measure derived from the nursing workforce demonstrates broad applicability in different public sector workforce contexts. Differences in the factor structure of the WB construct in this study when compared to the earlier nursing study suggest subtle differences may exist in the nature of bullying across workgroup settings. Future work in theory development should investigate further the complexities of the construct in order to learn how to manage and ultimately prevent WB behaviours.
Contribution/ Originality
This study contributes in the existing literature on workplace bullying by testing measures of the construct in the broader public sector workforce. It is one of very few studies to have established the construct validity of measures designed for the nursing workforce across a range of workforce settings.

Keywords:


Reference:

  1. Abe, K. and S. Henly, 2010. Bullying (Ijime) among Japanes hospital nurses: Modeling responses to the revised negative acts questionniare. Nursing Research, 59(2): 110-118.
  2. Ahmed, Y. and M. Brousinne, 2008. Pedagogic implications of anxiety and loss of agency. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(4): 340-352.
  3. Baillien, E., A. Rodr´?guez-Mun˜oz, H. De Witte, G. Notelaers and B. Moreno-Jim´enez, 2011. The demand-control model and target’s reports of bullying at work: A test within Spanish and Belgian blue-collar worker. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(2): 119-136.
  4. Berry, P.A., G.L. Gillespie, D. Gates and J. Schafer, 2012. Novice nurse productivity following workpace bullying. Jounral of Nursing Scholarship, 44(1): 80-87.
  5. Caponecchia, C. and A. Wyatt, 2009. Distinguishing between workplace bullying, harassment and violence: A risk management approach. Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, Australia and New Zealand, 25(6): 439 - 449.
  6. Corney, B., 2008. Aggression in the workplace. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 22(2): 164-177.
  7. Dale, R. and O. Acik, 2005. Analysis of workplace violence research frameworks. Office of Women’s Policy, Department for Victorian Communities, Melbourne. Available from http://jir.sagepub.com.ezproxy.scu.edu.au/content/54/5/637.full.pdf+html [Accessed 9th March 2015].
  8. Einarsen, S., H. Hoel and G. Notelaers, 2009. Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the negative acts questionnaire-revised. Work & Stress, 23(1): 24-44.
  9. Einarsen, S., H. Hoel, D. Zapf and C.L. Cooper, 2011. The concept of bullying and harassment at work. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf & L. Cooper (Eds). Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research and practice. 2nd Edn., London: Taylor & Francis. pp: 3-39.
  10. Einarsen, S.E., H. Hoel, D. Zapf and C.L. Cooper, 2003. The concept of bullying at work: The European tradition. In S. E. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf & C. L. Cooper (Eds). Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis. pp: 3-30.
  11. Estryn-Behar, M., B. Van Der Hejden, D. Camerino, C. Fry, O. Le Nexer, P.M. Conway and H.M. Hasselhorn, 2008. Violence risks in nursing-results from the European 'NEXT' study. Occupation Medicine, 58(2): 107-114.
  12. Freshwater, D., 2000. Crosscurrants: Against cultural narration in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(2): 481-484.
  13. Froman, R.D., 2001. Elements to consider in planning the use of factor analysis. Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research, 2(5). Available from www.snrs.org [Accessed 2/1/06].
  14. Hoel, H. and D. Beale, 2006. Workplace bullying, psychological perspectives and industrial relations: Towards a contextualized and interdisciplinary approach. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(2): 239-262.
  15. Hoel, H., B. Faragher and C.L. Cooper, 2004. Bullying is detrimental to health, but all bullying behaviours are not necessarily equally damaging. British Journal of Guidance Counselling, 32(3): 367-387.
  16. Hoel, H. and D. Salin, 2003. Organisational antecedents of workplace bullying. In Einarsen S, Hoel., H, Zapf, D., & Cooper, C.L., (Eds)  Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis. pp: 203-218.
  17. Hutchinson, M., 2013. Bullying as workgroup manipulation: A model for understanding patterns of victimization and contagion within the workgroup. Journal of Nursing Management, 21(3): 563-571.
  18. Hutchinson, M. and J. Hurley, 2013. Exploring leadership capability and emotional intelligence as moderators of workplace bullying. Journal of Nursing Management, 21(3): 553-562.
  19. Hutchinson, M., D. Jackson, L. Wilkes and M.H. Vickers, 2008. A new model of bullying in the nursing workplace: Organizational characteristics as critical antecedents. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(3): E60 - E71.
  20. Hutchinson, M., M. Vickers, D. Jackson and L. Wilkes, 2010a. Bullying as circuits of power: An Australian perspective. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(1): 25-47.
  21. Hutchinson, M., M. Vickers, L. Wilkes and D. Jackson, 2010. A typology of bullying behaviours: The experiences of Australian nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(15-16): 2319-2328.
  22. Hutchinson, M., M.H. Vickers, D. Jackson and L. Wilkes, 2008. The development and validation of a bullying inventory for the nursing workplace. Nurse Researcher, 15(2): 19-29.
  23. Hutchinson, M., M.H. Vickers, D. Jackson and L. Wilkes, 2010. Bullying as circuits of power: An Australian perspective. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(1): 25-47.
  24. Hutchinson, M., M.H. Vickers, D. Jackson and L. Wilkes, 2010b. Integrating individual, work group, and organisational level factors: Testing a multidimensional model of bullying in the nursing workplace. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(2): 173-181.
  25. Hutchinson, M., L. Wilkes, D. Jackson and M. Vickers, 2010. Integrating individual, work group and organisational factors: Testing a multidimensional model of bullying in the nursing workplace Journal of Nursing Management, 18(2): 173-181.
  26. Incidence of Accepted Workers’ Compensation Claims for Mental Stress in Australia, 2013. Canberra: Australian Government.
  27. Indvik, J.P.R., 2012. Lawsuits walk in on two feet: The bully in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications & Conflict, 16(2): 73-77.
  28. Johnson, S. and R. Rae, 2009. Workplace bullying: Concerns for nurse leaders. Journal of Nursing Administration, 39(2): 84-90.
  29. Joreskog, K. and I. Moustaki, 2001. Factor analysis of ordinal variables: A comparison of three approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(3): 347-387.
  30. Lewis, D. and R. Gunn, 2007. Workplace bullying in the public sector: Understanding the racial dimesions. Public Administration, 85(3): 641–665.
  31. Lewis, S. and J. Orford, 2005. Women's experiences of workplace bullying: Changes in social relationships. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 15(1): 29-47.
  32. Leymann, H., 1990. Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5(2): 119-126.
  33. Leymann, H., 1996. The content and development of mobbing at work. In D. Zapf & H. Leymann (Eds). Mobbing and victimization at work. Hove, England: Psychology. pp: 165-184.
  34. Lutgen-Sandvik, P., S.J. Tracy and J.K. Alberts, 2007. Burned by bullying in the American workplace: Prevalence, perception, degree and impact. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6): 837-862. DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00715.x.
  35. Lynch, J., 2002. Workplace bullying: Implications for police organisations. In A. C. f. P. Research (Eds). Critical issues in policing No. 8. Peyneham, South Australia: Australian Centre for Policing Research.
  36. Miller, H. and C. Rayner, 2012. The form and function of "bullying" behaviours in a strong occupational culture: Bullying in a U.K. police service. Group Organization Management, 37(3): 347-375.
  37. Mintz-Binder, R. and R.D. Calkiuns, 2012. Exposure ot bullying at the associate degree nursing program director level. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 7(4): 152-158.
  38. Nielsen, M.B. and S. Einarsen, 2012. Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: A meta-analytic review. Work & Stress, 26(4): 309-332. DOI 10.1080/02678373.2012.734709.
  39. Notelaers, G. and S. Einarsen, 2013. The world turns at 33 and 45: Defining simple cutoff scores for the negative acts questionnaire–revised in a representative sample. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(6). DOI 10.1080/1359432X.2012.690558.
  40. Oztyrjm, H., S. Sokment, F. Yilmax and D. Cilinger, 2008. Measuring mobbing experiences of academic nurses: Development of a mobbing scale. Journal of the American Adacemy of Nurse Practitioners, 20(9): 435-442.
  41. Performance Benchmarking of Australian Business Regulation, 2010. Occupational health and safety - research report. Canberra: Australian Government Productivity Commission.
  42. Queensland Public Service Workforce Characteristics 2011-2012, 2013. Queensland government Available from http://www.psc.qld.gov.au/publications/workforce-statistics/assets/characteristics-qps.pdf.
  43. Roberts, S.J., R. Demarco and M. Griffin, 2009. The effect of oppressed group behaviour on the culture of the nursing workplace: A review of the evidence and interventions for change. Journal of Nursing Management, 17(3): 288-293.
  44. Shellie, S., 2008. Workplace bullying experienced by Massachusetts registered nurses and the relationship to intention to leave the organizations. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(2): 148-159.
  45. Simons, S., 2008. Workplace bullying experienced by Massachusetts registered nurses and the relationship to intention to leave the organisation. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(2): E48-E59.
  46. Simons, S., R.B. Stark and R.F. DeMarco, 2011. A new, four item instrument to measure workplace bullying. Research in Nurisng & Health, 34(2): 132-140.
  47. Spence Laschinger, H.K., A.L. Grau, J. Finegan and P. Wilk, 2010. New graduate nurses' experiences of bullying and burnout in hospital settings. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(12): 2732-2742.
  48. Tabachnick, B.G. and L.S. Fidell, 1996. Using multivariate statistics. Needham heights. MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  49. Vessey, J.A., R. DeMarco and R. DiFazio, 2011. Bullying, harassment, and horizontal violence in the nursing workforce. The State of the Science, 28(1): 133-157.
  50. Vessey, J.A., R.R. Demarco, D. Gaffney and W.D. Budin, 2009. Bullying of staff registered nurses in the workplace: A preliminary study for developing personal and organisational strategies for the transformation of hostile to health workplace environments. Journal of Professional Nursing, 25: 299-306.
  51. Yildirim, A. and D. Yildirim, 2007. Mobbing in the wrkplace by peers and managers: Mobbing experienced by nurses working in healthcare facilities in Turkey and its effects on nurses, 16(8): 1444-1453.
  52. Yildirim, D., 2009. Bullying among nurses and its effect. International Nursing Review, 56(4): 504-511.
  53. Yildirim, D. and Y. Aytolan, 2008. Development and psychometric evaluation of workplace psychologically violent behaviours instrument. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(10): 1361-1370.
  54. Zapf, D., 1999. Organisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2): 70-85.

Statistics:

Google Scholor ideas Microsoft Academic Search bing Google Scholor

Funding:

Competing Interests:

Acknowledgement:


Related Article

( 1 ) Workplace Bullying: Modelling Construct Validity in an Australian Public Sector Workforce
( 5 ) The Lead-Lag Relationships between Construction　Investment and GDP: Granger Causality Tests and Impulse Responses Using Japanese Data
( 6 ) Construction and Application of Water Resource Accounting Information System in Taiwan
( 7 ) Optimal Stock Portfolio Issuers of Building Construction Registered in LQ45 Based on the Markowitz Approach
( 10 ) Public Sector Reforms and New Public Management: Exploratory Evidence from Australian Public Sector
( 11 ) Public Infrastructure Spending and Economic Growth in Nigeria: An Error Correction Mechanism (ECM) Approach
( 12 ) Social Security; A Public Policy for Good Governance in Nigeria: The Role of Nigerian Legislature
( 13 ) Quality Management Practices towards Customer Satisfaction in Local Authority Public Services Website
( 14 ) Kuala Lumpur Urban Biodiversity: Birds Community in Urban Public Parks
( 15 ) The Phenomenon of Money Politics and Nigeria’s Democratization: An Exploration of the Fourth Republic
( 17 ) An Assessment of the Impact of Information Communication Technology (ICT) On the Administration of Public Records: A Case Study of the Bolgatanga Municipal Assembly in the Upper East Region of Ghana-West Africa
( 18 ) Republic of Zimbabwe National Water Policy: A Desk Review of the Gaps between the Policy and Its Implementation
( 19 ) Share Options, Share Award and Firm’s Performance: Evidence from Malaysian Public Listed Companies
( 20 ) System of Payroll in the Public Sector Administration
( 21 ) Managing Public Perception towards Local Government Administration
( 22 ) The Effect of Public Debt on Domestic Product and Unemployment (An Empirical Study on the Palestinian Economy)
( 23 ) Panel Data Analysis of the Impact of Economic Freedom as Well as Economic Conditions, The Quality of Life, and Public Education Spending on U.S. Undocumented Immigrant Settlement Patterns
( 25 ) The Impact of the Politics of Privatization and Commercialization of Public Enterprises in Nigeria on the Level of Productivity and Economic Viability: The Case of Alscon and Nitel
( 26 ) Auditing Procedures and Process in the Public Sector
( 27 ) How the Principles of the Sharing Economy Can Improve Organizational Performance of the US Public School System
( 28 ) Public Sector Size and GDP Growth Nexus: Panel Data Estimation
( 29 ) Public-Private Partnership as a Strategy for E-Governance Funding in Africa: The Gains and the Pains
( 30 ) The Importance of Public Administration Towards Achieving Good Governance for Positive National Development by Using SmartPLS 3
( 31 ) Does Agricultural Sector Contribute to the Economic Growth in Case of Republic of Benin?
( 32 ) Determinants of Public Sector Corruption in Nigeria
( 33 ) Service Quality and Outpatients Satisfaction in Public Hospitals in Malaysia
( 34 ) Public Health Expenditure, Economic Growth and Health Outcomes in Nigeria
( 35 ) The Impact of Organisational Culture on Public Sector Performance: A Case Study of Local Authorities in Zimbabwe
( 36 ) Africa's Human Capital Development: Is Public Finance Management an Effective Strategy?
( 37 ) NGO Programming and Policy Advocacy in the Land Sector in Zimbabwe
( 38 ) Consideration the Effects of Water Sector Investment on Economic Growth in Iran
( 39 ) Influence Internship Learning Effect in Business Service Sector: Using Internship Self-Efficacy as the Mediator Variable
( 40 ) The Impact of Dividend Policy on Shareholders’ Wealth before and After Financial Melt down: Evidence from FMCG Sector in India
( 41 ) The Biodiesel Market in Brazil and the Prospects for the Sector
( 42 ) Attributes Influencing Strategic Alignment in the Service Sector: An Indonesian Banking Sector Case Study
( 44 ) The Effect of Selected Financial Ratios on Profitability: An Empirical Analysis of Listed Firms of Cement Sector in Saudi Arabia