Conscientia Beam || conscientiabeam.com

Export to

Citations

Contact Us

For Marketing, Sales and Subscriptions Inquiries

2637 E Atlantic Blvd #43110
Pompano Beach, FL 33062

USA

Conference List

International Journal of Business, Economics and Management

May 2017, Volume 4, 5, pp 95-105

Relevance of Stakeholders Theory, Organizational Identity Theory and Social Exchange Theory to Corporate Social Responsibility and Employees Performance in the Commercial Banks in Nigeria

Joseph Albasu

Jerome Nyameh

Joseph Albasu¹
Jerome Nyameh²

Leed University UK ¹

Department of Economics, Taraba State University, Jalingo, Taraba State, Nigeria ²

on Google Scholar

on PubMed

Pages: 95-105

DOI: 10.18488/journal.62.2017.45.95.105

Article History:

Received: 24 February, 2017
Revised: 20 April, 2017
Accepted: 22 June, 2017
Published: 03 August, 2017

View Citation

945Views

Create Citation Alert

Abstract:

The study examine the perceived impact of corporate social responsibility in the Nigerian commercial banks in order to investigate the two constructs of independent and dependent variable one study objective was formulated as (i) To investigate if internal CSR practices have influence on employees’ performance in the Nigerian banks. A qualitative method was adopted for the study because flexibility in data gathering was essential to understand the internal CSR practices of the banks. The sample population for the interviews was directors and executives of CSR from the main six banks operating in Nigeria based on their per-capital shares and nationwide presence. The interview questions were opened ended in nature and structured based on the findings of literature on internal CSR and divided into sections. The Nvivo9 software was used to conduct the analysis of the data collected. The finding revealed that ta number of factors could contribute to the level at which internal CSR influence employee’s performance.

Contribution/ Originality

Keywords:

Corporate social responsibility, Employee’s performance, Commercial banks and Nigeria.

Video:

Download Video

Download Audio

Reference:

Aaronson, S.A., 2003. Corporate responsibility in the global village: The British role model and the American laggard. Business and Society Review, 108(3): 309-338. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Abraham, R.V., D.E. Rupp, C.A. Williams and J. Ganapathi, 1998. Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and The US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3): 147 - 158.

Aguilera, R.V., D.E. Rupp, C.A. Williams and J. Ganapathi, 2006. Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3): 147 - 158. View at Google Scholar

Aguilera, R.V., D.E. Rupp, C.A. Williams and J. Ganapathi, 2007. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multi level theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 836-863. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Albinger, H.S. and S.J. Freeman, 2000. Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3): 243-253. View at Google Scholar

Amaeshi, K.M., B. Adi, C.O. Ogbechie and O.O. Amao, 2006. Corporate social responsibility in Nigeria: Western mimicry or indigenous influences? Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 24: 83-99. View at Google Scholar

Aquinis, H., 2011. Public responsibility in the private corporation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 20(2): 135-145.

Auppperle, K.E., A.B. Carroll and J.D. Hatfield, 1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2): 446-463. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Bauman, A. and J. Skitka, 2012. Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32(2012): 63–86. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Bhattacharya, C. and S. Sen, 1995. Doing better at doing good: When, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1): 9-24.

Bowling, N.A., K.J. Eschleman, Q. Wang, C. Kirkendall and G. Alarcon, 2010. A meta-analysis of the predictors and consequences of organization-based self-esteem. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3): 601-626. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Carmelli, A., G. Gillat and D.A. Waldman, 2007. The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6): 972-992. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Carroll, A.B., 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management Journal Review, 4(4): 497-505. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Carroll, A.B., 1999. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construction. Business and Society, 38(3): 268-295 View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Carroll, A.B., 2008. A history of CSR: Concept and practices. In: Crane, A., Matten, D., McWilliams, A., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp: 19-45.

Castello, I. and J.M. Lozano, 2011. Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1): 11-29. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Cheney, S., 1983. The case study method for research in small-and medium-sized firms. International Small Business Journal, 15(1): 73-85.

Crowther, D. and B. Rayman, 2005. International dimensions of corporate social responsibility. ICFAI University Press, 1.

Dahlsrud, A., 2006. How corporate responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1-13).

Davenport, T.H., 2000. Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Donaldson, T. and L.E. Preston, 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65-91. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Ekeh, P.P., 1974. Social exchange theory: The two traditions. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.

European Union Commission (EUC), 2002. Deliberation on corporate social responsibility.

Fereday, W. and C. Muir, 2006. Business and society; corporate strategy, public policy, ethics. 7th Edn., New York: McGraw-Hill.

Fombrun, C., 2000. What`s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2): 233-258.

Frederick, W.C., J.E. Post and K. Davis, 1992. Business and society; corporate strategy, public policy, ethics. 7th Edn., New York: McGraw-Hill.

Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic management; a stakeholder approach. Pitman Publication.

Gottel, V., L. Mory and B.W. Wirtz, 2015. Factors of internal corporate social responsibility and the effect on organisational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management.

Gouldner, A.W., 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2): 161-178. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Heiner, L. and F.Y. Boon, 2002. Differences in environmental reporting practises in the UK and the US: The legal and regulatory context. British Accounting Review, 35: 1-18.

Hillman, R., P. Paluru, E. Matusov and L. Lam, 2001. Catecholamine biosynthesis in early embryogenesis. A. Dros. Res. Conf. 42 : 711C. (Export to RIS).

Honders, H., 2007. Partnerships for corporate social responsibility; a review of concepts and strategic options. Management Decision, 46(1): 152-167.

Hopkins, H.A., 2003. Partnerships for corporate social responsibility; a review of concepts and strategic options. Management Decision, 46(1): 152-167.

Hsieh, N.H., 2006. Do multinational corporations have an ethical obligation to assist those in need, knowledge Wharton Feb 23rd.

Jones, B., R. Bowd and R. Tench, 2007. Perception and perspectives: Corporate social responsibility and the media. Journal of Communication Management, 11(4): 348-370. View at Google Scholar

Maignan, I. and O.C. Ferrell, 2000. Nature of corporate responsibilities. Perspectives from American, French and German consumers. Journal of Business Research, 56(1): 55-67.

Maignan, I. and O.C. Ferrell, 2001. Antecedents and benefits of corporate citizenship: An investigation of French businesses. Journal of Business Research, 51(1): 37-51. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Maignan, I., O.C. Ferrell and G.T.M. Hult, 1999. Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4): 455-469. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Margolis, J.D. and J.P. Walsh, 2003. Misery loves companies: Whither social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 268-305. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Mei Peng low, D. and D. McCabe, 1993. Introduction to the practice of statistics. New York: Freeman.

Nwosu, O., 2005. Reputation management; imperative of a new order. Financial Standard, June 20: 7.

Peterson, D.K., 2004. The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business and Society, 43(3): 269-319. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Rayton, 2007. Work engagement, psychological contract breach and job satisfaction. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(17).

Richardson, H., 2008. Valuing stakeholder engagement and sustainability reporting. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.

Riordan, C.M., R.D. Gatewood and J.B. Bill, 1997. Corporate image: Employee reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance. Journal for Business Ethics, 16(4): 401-412. View at Google Scholar

Ruf, F., M. Coughlan and P. Cronin, 2000. Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part2: Qualitative research. Dublin: University of Dublin, Trinity College.

Rupp, D.E., J. Gananpathy, R.V. Aguilera and C.A. Williams, 2006. Employees reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4): 537-543. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Siefurt, B., S. Morris and B. Bartkus, 2003. Comparing big givers and small giver: Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 5(3): 195-211. View at Google Scholar

Sims, R.L. and K.G. Kroeck, 1994. The influence of ethical fit on employee satisfaction, commitment and turnover. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(12): 939-947. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Strand, R., R. Levine and D. Montgomery, 1981. Organizational entry preferences based on social and personnel policies: An information integration perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 27(1): 50-68. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Swanson, D.L., 2008. Business citizenship outside and inside organizations. In: J. Andriof and M. McIntosh. Perspective on corporate citizenship. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing. pp: 104-116.

Swanson, D.L. and P. Niehoff, 2001. Business citizenship outside and inside organizations. In: J. Andriof and M. McIntosh. Perspective on Corporate Citizenship. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing. pp: 104-116.

Terungwa, A., 2011. Corporate social responsibility in Nigerian banking system: The development of small and medium scale enterprises. World Journal of Social Sciences, 1(5): 12-27. View at Google Scholar

Theofilou, D. and L. Watson, 2014. The joint effect of personality and workplace social exchange relationship in predicting tasks performance and citizenship performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5): 1286-1292.

Turban, D.B. and D.W. Greening, 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy Management Journal, 40(3): 658-672. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Turnbull, J.P., G. Khoury and J. Rostami, 1999. Corporate social responsibility: Turning words into action. The Conference Board of Canada Ottawa.

Waldman, D.W., D.S. Siegel and M. Javidhan, 2006. Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8): 1703-1725. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher

Wood, D.J., 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 691-718. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher