Adu-Gyamfi, K. and J.G. Ampiah, 2019a. Chemistry students’ difficulties in learning oxidation-reduction reactions. Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 28(2): 180-200.
Adu-Gyamfi, K. and J.G. Ampiah, 2019b. Students’ alternative conceptions associated with application of redox reactions in everyday life. Asian Education Studies, 4(1): 29-38.
Adu-Gyamfi, K., J.G. Ampiah and D.D. Agyei, 2015. High school chemistry students’ alternative conceptions of H2O, OH-, and H+ in balancing redox reactions. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 4(6): 744-758.
Andriessen, D., 2006. Combining design-based research and action research to test management solutions. A Paper Presented at the 7th World Congress Action Research and Process Management, Groningen.
Bong, A.Y.L. and T.T. Lee, 2016. Form four students’ misconceptions in electrolysis of molten compounds and aqueous solutions. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1): 1-28.
Brown, T.H., 2005. Beyond constructivism: Exploring future learning paradigms. Education Today, 2(2): 1-11.
Calik, M., A. Ayas and R.K. Coll, 2006. A constructivist-based model for teaching of dissolution of gas in a liquid. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 2(1): 1-8.
Chuen, T.W., O. Majid, Z.A. Rahman, S.F.M. Dahlan and H. Atan, 2008. Generative learning objects for collaborative learning and critical thinking: A proposed conceptual framework. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 10(1): 129-141.
Ciobanu, N.R., 2018. Active and participatory teaching methods. European Journal of Education, 1(2): 69-72.Available at: https://doi.org/10.26417/ejed.v1i2.p69-72.
Cooperstein, S.E. and E. Kocevar-Weidinger, 2004. Beyond active learning: A constructivist approach to learning. Reference Services Review, 32(2): 141-148.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320410537658.
Ernest, P., 2010. Reflections on theories of learning. In B. Sriraman, & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education. Heidelberg: Springer. pp: 39-47.
Felder, R., 1993. Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5): 286-290.
Foster, N.F., N. Dimmock and A. Bersani, 2008. Participatory design of websites with web design workshops. The Code4lib Journal, 2: 1-15.
Gal, B., M. Rubio, E. Iglesias and P. González, 2018. Evaluation of participatory teaching methods in undergraduate medical students' learning along the first academic courses. PloS one, 13(1): e0190173-e0190173.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190173.
Hein, G.E., 1991. Constructivist learning theory. A Paper Presented at CECA (International Committee of Museum Educators) Conference, Jerusalem.
Kruse, J., 2009. Learning theories: Pillars of teacher decision-making. Iowa Science Teachers Journal, 36(2): 2-7.
Kucharcikova, A. and E. Tokarcikova, 2016. Use of participatory methods in teaching at the university. The Online Journal of Science and Technology, 6(1): 82-90.
Landcare Research, 2002. Using participatory and learning-based approaches for environmental management to help achieve constructive behaviour change. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
Liu, C.C., K.H. Tseng and L.Y. Wu, 2013. A participatory learning framework for enhancing children’s reading experience with electronic book readers. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(1): 129-151.
Lowenthal, P. and R. Muth, 2008. Constructivism. In E. F. Provenzo, Jr. (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of the social and cultural foundations of education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp: 177-179.
McLoughlin, C. and M.J.W. Lee, 2007. Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the web 2.0 era. A Paper Presented at the Proceedings ASCILITE Singapore.
Omollo, A.D., B. Nyakrura and Y. Mbalamula, 2017. Application of participatory teaching and learning approach in teacher training colleges in Tanzania. Journal of Scientific Research & Reports, 16(6): 1-10.Available at: https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2017/34417.
Osterlund, L.L. and M. Ekborg, 2009. Students’ understanding of redox reactions in three situations. Nordina, 5(2): 115-127.Available at: https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.345.
Pain, R., G. Whitman and D. Milledge, 2011. Participatory action research toolkit: An introduction to using PAR as an approach to learning, research, and action. Available from https://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/beacon/PARtoolkit.pdf .
Richardson, V., 2003. Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105(9): 1623-1640.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00303.x.
Shen, J., D. Wu, V. Achhpiliya, M. Bieber and R. Hiltz, 2004. Participatory learning approach: An overview (ver. 1.0). A Technical Report Submitted to New Jersey Institute of Technology, New Jersey.
Sjoberg, S., 2007. Constructivism and learning. Invited contribution to Baker, E., McGaw, B. and Person, P. (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of education. 3rd Edn., Oxford: Elsevier.
Su, C., C.-H. Chiu and T.-I. Wang, 2010. The development of SCORM-conformant learning content based on the learning cycle using participatory design. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5): 392-406.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00355.x.
Taber, K.S., 2011. Constructivism as educational theory: Contingency in learning, and optimally guided instruction. In J. Hassaskhah (Ed.), Educational theory. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. pp: 39-61.
Tetzlaff, T., 2009. Constructivist learning verses explicit teaching: A personal discovery of balance. Available from www.cct.umb.edu/tetzlaff.pdf .
Trauth-Nare, A. and G. Buck, 2011. Using reflective practice to incorporate formative assessment in a middle school science classroom: A participatory action research study. Educational Action Research, 19(3): 379-398.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2011.600639.
UNESCO, 2001. Handbook: Non-formal adult education facilitators. 6. Module four. Bangkok: UNESCO PROAP. pp: 1-40.
Wilson, B.G., 2010. Constructivism in practice and historical context. In B. Reiser, & J. Dempsey (Eds.), Current trends in instructional design and technology. 3rd Edn., Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. pp: 1-11.
This study received no specific financial support.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All authors contributed equally to the conception and design of the study.