This study investigated the influence of laboratory method on students’ mathematical creativity in junior secondary schools in Yenagoa, Bayelsa State. The study was guided by three research questions and three hypotheses. The Pretest- Postest non-randomise control group design was adopted for the study. A sample of 122 students from two intact classes selected randomly was used for the study. The instruments for data collection were the Mathematics Creativity Test (MCT) and Students Attitude towards Mathematics Questionnaire (SAMQ). The data collected were analysed using mean and standard deviation, and the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). The result indicated that Laboratory method of teaching significantly enhance students’ creativity in mathematics. The method equally enhanced mathematical creativity of both male and female students. Students’ attitude towards mathematics also influenced mathematical creativity significantly. Among others, it was recommended that mathematics teachers should explore the use of laboratory method in teaching various concepts in Junior Secondary School level.
Behar-Horenstein, L.S., A.C. Ornstein and E.F. Pajak, 2003. Contemporary issues in curriculum. New York: Pearson Education Inc.
Brunkalla, K., 2009. How to increase mathematical creativity. An experiment. Le Montana Mathematics Euthusiast, 6(1&2): 257-266.
Craft, A., 2005. Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. London: Routledge.
Emaikwu, S.O., 2012. Assessing the relative effectiveness of three teaching method in the measurement of students achievement in mathematics. Journal of Emerging Trend Edu Res Pol Stud, 3(4): 179-186.
Ervynck, G., 1991. Mathematical creativity. In D. Tall (Eds). Advanced mathematical thinking. New York: Kluwe. Academic Publishers. pp: 42-53.
Gil, E., D. Ben-Zvi and N. Apel, 2007. What is hidden beyond the data? Helping young students to reason and agree about some wider universe. In D. Pratt & J. Ainley (Eds). Reason about statistical inferences: A collection of current research studies. Proceedings of the Fifth International Forum for Research on Statistical Reasoning, Thinking, and Literacy.
Grainer, T., J. Barnes and S. Scoftham, 2006. Creativity teaching for tomorrow: Developing a creative state of mind CCCU. A Report for Creative Partnership, Kent.
Mann, E.L., 2005. Mathematical Creativity and School Mathematics: Indicators of Mathematical Creativity in middle School PhD Dissertation. Available www.gifted.uconn.
NERDC, 2007. Federal ministry of education 9- year basic education curriculum mathematics for upper basic (Junior Secondary School 1 - 3). Lagos: Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC).
Renzulli, J.S., M. Gentry and S.M. Reis, 2004. A time and place for authentic learning. Educational Leadership, 62(1): 73-77.
Renzulli, J.S., J.H. Leppien and T.S. Hays, 2000. The multiple menu model: A pratical guide for developing differentiated curriculum. Mansfield Center, CT: Creativity Learning Press.
Runco, M.A., 1993. Creativity as an educational objective for disadvantaged students (RBDM 9306). Storrs, CT: The National Research Centre of the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Sabbagh, S., 2012. Student creativity in mathematics education in early childhood in Jordan. On line Journal of Counseling ans Education, 2(1): 42-52. [Accessed April 4, 2014].