There is little research on student-teachers’ attitudes and contact with students with disabilities, and even fewer researchers have investigated student-teachers’ empathy. This study investigated the association between student-teachers’ contact with students with disabilities and their attitudes toward students with disabilities as well as the association between student-teachers’ attitudes toward students with disabilities and their level of empathy. Student-teachers’ contact with students with disabilities was not associated with their attitudes toward students with disabilities. However, higher student-teacher empathy was associated with attitudes that were more positive toward students with disabilities. While most educators would agree that future teachers should be exposed to as many diverse students as possible, this study points to an interpersonal quality that may play a more vital role in shaping future teachers’ attitudes toward students with disabilities. This affects how we prepare future teachers and highlights the need for empathy training for future teachers.
Abbott, S. and R. McConkey, 2006. The barriers to social inclusion as perceived by people with intellectual disabilities. Journalof Intellectual Disabilities, 10(3): 275–287.
Allport, G.W., 1954. The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Antonak, R., 1982. Development and psychometric analysis of the scale of attitudes toward disabled persons. The Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 13(2): 22-29.
Bacon, E.H. and J.B. Schultz, 1991. A survey of mainstreaming practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14(2): 144–149.
Barr, J.J., 2011. The relationship between teachers' empathy and perceptions of school culture. Educational Studies, 37(3): 365-369.
Barr, J.J. and K. Bracchitta, 2008. The effects of contact with individuals with disabilities: Positive attitudes and majoring in education. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 142(2): 225-243.
Batson, D.C., 1991. The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bauman, S. and A. Del Rio, 2006. Preservice teachers’ responses to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1): 219-231.
Berry, R.A.W., 2008. Novice teacher’s conceptions of fairness in inclusion classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5): 1149-1159.
Branan, J.M., 1972. Negative human interaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(1): 81-82.
Brandes, J.A. and H.M. Crowson, 2009. Predicting dispositions toward inclusion of students with disabilities: The role of conservative ideology and discomfort with disability. Social Psychology of Education, 12(2): 271-289.
Branwhite, T., 1988. The pass survey: School-based preferences of 500+ adolescent consumers. Educational Studies, 14(2): 165-176.
Brownlee, J. and S. Carrington, 2000. Opportunities for authentic experience and reflection: A teaching programme designed to change attitudes towards disability for pre-service teachers. Support for Learning, 15(3): 99-105.
Burke, K. and C. Sutherland, 2004. Attitudes toward inclusion: Knowledge vs. Experience. Education, 125(2): 163-172.
Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd Edn., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Conte, R., 1994. A mediational training program for parents of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 9(3-4): 33-68.
Cook, B.G., 2004. Inclusive teachers’ attitudes toward their students with disabilities: A replication and extension. The Elementary School Journal, 104(4): 307-320.
Cook, B.G., D.L. Cameron and M. Tankersley, 2007. Inclusive teachers’ attitudinal ratings of their students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 40(4): 230-238.
Cooper, B., 2010. In search of profound empathy in learning relationships: Understanding the mathematics of moral learning environments. Journal of Moral Education, 39(1): 79-99.
Cortina, J.M. and R.S. Landis, 2009. When small effect sizes tell a big story, and when larger effect sizes don’t. In C.E. Lance & R.J. Vandenberg (Eds.), statistical and methodological myths andurban legends. New York: Routledge. pp: 287–336.
Davis, M.H., 1980. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(1): 85.
Davis, M.H., 1983. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 44(1): 113-126.
Davis, M.H. and S.L. Franzoi, 1991. Stability and change in adolescent self-consciousness and empathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(1): 70-87.
Eisenberg, N., 1990. Prosocial development in early and mid-adolescence. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, T. P. Gulotta, (Eds.), from childhood to adolescence, a transitional period. Advances in adolescent development. An annual book series. California: Sage Publication. 2.
Eisenberg, N., 2006. Prosocial behavior. In G.G. Bear & K.M. Minke (Eds.), children’s needs III: Development, prevention, andintervention. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists. pp: 313–324.
Eisenberg, N. and R.A. Fabes, 1999. Emotion, emotion-related regulation, and quality of socioemotional functioning. In L. Balter& C Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues. New York, NY: Psychology Press. pp: 318-335.
Eisenberg, N. and P.H. Müssen, 1989. The roots of prosocial behavior in children. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ferguson, C.J., 2009. An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional psychology. Research and Practice, 40(5): 532–538. DOI 10.1037/a0015808.
Findler, L., N. Vilchinsky and S. Werner, 2007. The multidimensional attitudes scale toward persons with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 50(3): 166–176. DOI 10.1177/00343552070500030401.
Fredrickson, B.L. and L.L. Carstensen, 1990. Choosing social partners: How old age and anticipated endings make people more selective. Psychology and Aging, 5(3): 335-347.
Good, T.L. and J.E. Brophy, 2000. Motivation. In T. Good & J. Brophy (Eds.), looking in classrooms. New York, NY: Longman. pp: 217-267.
Harvey, D. and C. Green, 1984. Attitudes of New Zealand teachers, teachers in training and non-teachers toward mainstreaming. Journal of Educational Studies, 19(1): 34-44.
Hastings, R. and S. Oakford, 2003. Student teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special needs. Educational Psychology, 23(1): 87-94.
Hoffman, M.L., 2000. Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hunt, B. and C. Hunt, 2000. Attitudes toward people with disabilities: A comparison of undergraduate rehabilitation and business majors. Rehabilitation Education 14(3): 269–283.
Jahoda, A. and I. Markova, 2004. Coping with social stigma: People with intellectual disabilities moving from institutions and family home. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(8): 719–729.
Jones, R.S., D. Wint and N.C. Ellis, 1990. The social effects of stereotyped behavior. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 34(3): 261-268.
Kalyva, E. and I. Agaliotis, 2009. Can contact affect Greek children’s understanding of and attitudes towards peers with physical disabilities? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24(2): 213–220.
Kremer, J.F. and L.L. Dietzen, 1991. Two approaches to teaching accurate empathy to undergraduates: Teacher-intensive and self-directed. Journal of College Student Development, 32(1): 69-75.
Lam, T.C.M., K. Kolomitro and F.C. Alamparambil, 2011. Empathy training: Methods, evaluation practices, and validity. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 7(16): 162-200.
Makas, E., 1993. Getting in touch: The relationship between contact with and attitudes towards people with disabilities.In M. Nagler (Ed.), perspectives on disability. Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research. pp: 121–136.
McCaughey, T.J. and D.C. Strohmer, 2005. Prototypes as an indirect measure of attitudes toward disability groups. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 48(2): 89–99. DOI 10.1177/00343552050480020301.
McDougall, J., D.J. DeWit, G. King, L.T. Miller and S. Killip, 2004. High school-aged youths attitudes toward their peers with disabilities: The role of school and student interpersonal factors. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 51(3): 287–313. DOI 10.1080/1034912042000259242.
McManus, J.L., K.J. Feyes and D.A. Saucier, 2010. Contact and knowledge as predictors of attitudes toward individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(5): 579–590.
Murphy, D.M., 1996. Implications of inclusion for general and special education. Elementary School Journal, 96(5): 469–493.
Pettigrew, T.F. and L.R. Tropp, 2006. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5): 751–783. DOI 10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1241.
Pruett, S.R., E.J. Lee, F. Chan, M.H. Wang and F.J. Lane, 2008. Dimensionality of the contact with disabled persons scale: Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Rehabilitation Counseling, 51(4): 210–221. DOI 10.1177/0034355207311310.
Schultz, L.H., R.L. Selman and M.D. LaRusso, 2003. The assessment of psychosocial maturity in children and adolescents: Implications for the evaluation of school-based character education programs. Journal of Researchin Character Education, 1(2): 67-87.
Scruggs, T.E. and M.A. Mastropieri, 1996. Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion, 1958-1995: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 63(1): 59-75.
Selman, R.L., 1980. The growth of interpersonal understanding. New York: Academic Press.
Seo, W. and R.K. Chen, 2009. Attitudes of college students toward people with disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 40(4): 3–8.
Sharp, S. and M. Hewstone, 2010. Impact of context effects on attitudes and contact: Evidence of the validity of self-reports of intergroup contact. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 17(1): 5-15.
Smart, J., 2008. Disability, society, and the individual. 2nd Edn., Austin, TX: ProEd.
Stewart, C., 1990. Effect of practica types in preservice adapted physical education curriculum on attitudes toward disabled populations. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 10(1): 76–83.
Tait, K. and N. Purdie, 2000. Attitudes toward disability: Teacher education for inclusive environments in an Australian university. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47(1): 25-38.
Tettegah, S. and C.J. Anderson, 2007. Pre-service teachers' empathy and cognitions: Statistical analysis of text data by graphical models. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(1): 48-82.
Thomas, A., 2001. The multidimensional character of biased perceptions of individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 67(2): 3–9.
US Department of Education, 2008. Thirtieth annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act. Washington, DC: Author.
Wentzel, K.R., 1997. Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3): 411-419.
Yoon, J.S., 2004. Predicting teacher interventions in bullying situations. Education and Treatment of Children, 27(1): 37-45.
Yuker, H., 1988. The effects of contact on attitudes toward disabled persons: Some empirical generalizations. In H.Yuker (Ed.). Attitudes toward persons with disabilities.New York: Springer Publishing.
Yuker, H., 1994. Variables that influence attitudes toward people with disabilities: Conclusions from the data. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9(5): 3–22.
This study received no specific financial support.
The author declare that there are no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.