This research reports the procedures the writers have employed in teaching several academic and workplace communication skills through engineering multidisciplinary projects (EMDPs). In these projects students are divided into teams, with each team comprising a minimum of three and a maximum of four students from different engineering majors. The students choose and appoint a team leader, choose a research topic/problem in the surrounding environment that requires input from all team members and collaboration from all students, each in his/her respective discipline, in finding a solution to the situation/problem. Team members choose the topics, obtain approval of the topics from cooperating engineering faculty and the course instructor, and then prepare detailed research proposals. They receive specialist feedback on their proposals, and based on how detailed their proposals are, are given the go ahead to proceed with their research. The execution of the research project requires the use of several technical communication skills such as, internet searches; sending email messages; writing formal letters; meeting with officials, engineering academics and experts, as well as giving powerpoint supported oral presentations, EMDP poster presentations and submitting end of research written reports.
Poster Presentations, Teamwork, Communication Skills, Project Defense
Amare, N. and C. Brammer, 2005. Perceptions of memo quality: A case study of engineering practitioners, professors, and students. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 35(2): 179-190.
Ashman, P.J., S. Scrutton, D. Stringer, P.J. Mullinger and J. Willison, 2008. Stakeholder perceptions of chemical engineering graduate attributes at the University of Adelaide. Proc. Chemeca. Newcastle City Hall, New South Wales, Australia.
Bodmer, C., A. Leu, L. Mira and H. Rutter, 2002. SPINE: Successful Practices in International Engineering Education: Engineers shape our future, IngCh.
Brandt, C., 2009. Power point or posters for EAP students’ presentation skills development? Chapter 12 in Stewart, T. (Ed), Insights on Teaching Speaking in TESOL, Virginia, USA: TESOL International Publications Inc.
Chun, M., 2010. Taking teaching to (performance) task: Linking pedagogical and assessment practices. Change, 42(2): 22-29.
Cianflone, E., 2011. A preliminary description of abstracts and poster presentations in food sciences. English for Specific Purposes World, 10(32).
EL- Sakran, T.M. and A. Awad, 2012. Voices from the United Arab Emirates: Engineering graduates’ labour market requisite competencies, International Journal of Engineering Education, 3(2): 105-114.
El-Sakran, T.M., D. Prescott and A. Ankit, 2011; 2012; 2013. Business Multi-Disciplinary Projects (BMDPs) in ESP classes to develop workplace communication skills. English for Specific Purposes World, 12(35): 1-41.
EL-Sakran, T.M., D. Prescott and M. Mesanovic, 2012; 2013. Contextualizing teamwork in a professional communication course for engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2): 1–11.
Ferris, D. and T. Tagg, 1996a. Academic oral communication needs of EAP learners: What subject-matter instructors actually require. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1): 31–58.
Ferris, D. and T. Tagg, 1996b. Academic listening / speaking tasks for ESL students: Problems, suggestions, and implications. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2): 297-320.
Herrington, J. and R. Oliver, 2000. An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(3): 23–48.
Kassim, H. and F. Ali, 2010. English communicative events and skills needed at the workplace: Feedback from the industry. English for Specific Purposes, 29(3): 168-182.
Kehe, D. and P. Kehe, 1996. Professors’ expectations of foreign students in freshman-level courses. JALT Journal, 18(1): 108–115.
Male, S.A., M.B. Bush and E.S. Chapman, 2010. Perceptions of competency deficiencies in engineering graduates. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 16(1): 55-67.
Martin, R., B. Maytham, J. Case and D. Fraser, 2005. Engineering graduates’ perceptions of how well they were prepared for work in industry. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2): 167–180.
Mercer, J.A., 2006. A madness to our method: Congregational studies as a cross-disciplinary approach to contextualizing teaching and learning in theological education. Taching Theology and Religione, 9(3): 148-155.
Merrill, M.D., 2002. First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3): 43–59.
Nair, C.S., A. Patel and P. Mertova, 2009. Re-engineering graduate skills – a case study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2): 131-139.
Parvis, L.F., 2001. The importance of communication and public-speaking skills. Journal of Environmental Health, 63:44, 35.
Predmore, S.R., 2005. Putting it into context. Techniques, 80: 22-25.
Rilling, S. and M. Dantas-Whitney, 2009. Authenticity, creativity, and localization in language learning, in Authenticity in the language classroom and beyond: Adult learners. In Rilling, S. andDantas-Whitney, M. (eds.) TESOL, USA.
Stipe, M. and L. Yasen, 2009. Climate change and other hot topics on campus: project-based learning. in Authenticity in the language classroom and beyond: Adult learners, S. Rilling, and M. Dantas-Whitney (eds.) TESOL, USA.
Swales, J.M., 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winsor, J., D. Curtis and R. Stephens, 1997. National preferences in business and communication education; a survey update. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 3: 170-179.
Yu, H., 2008. Contextualize technical writing assessment to better prepare students for workplace writing: Student-centered assessment instruments. Journal of Writing and Communication, 38(3): 265-284.
This study received no specific financial support.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All authors contributed equally to the conception and design of the study.