Conscientia Beam || conscientiabeam.com

Export to

Citations

Contact Us

For Marketing, Sales and Subscriptions Inquiries

2637 E Atlantic Blvd #43110
Pompano Beach, FL 33062

USA

Conference List

The Economics and Finance Letters

December 2020, Volume 7, 2, pp 276-288

What Explains the Overwhelmingly Positive Perception towards Microfinance Institutions? Application of Firth’s Logistic Regression in a Small Sample

Shankar Ghimire

Anna Valeva

Rong Zheng

Shankar Ghimire¹ ^,

Anna Valeva²
Rong Zheng¹

Assistant Professor, School of Accounting, Finance, Economics, and Decision Sciences Western Illinois University 1 University Circle, Macomb, IL, USA. ¹

Associate Professor, School of Accounting, Finance, Economics, and Decision Sciences Western Illinois University 1 University Circle, Macomb, IL, USA. ²

on Google Scholar

on PubMed

Pages: 276-288

DOI: 10.18488/journal.29.2020.72.276.288

Article History:

Received: 16 September, 2020
Revised: 01 October, 2020
Accepted: 09 October, 2020
Published: 22 October, 2020

View Citation

164Views

Create Citation Alert

Abstract:

This paper focuses on analyzing small-sample business survey data. We survey 129 businesses in Nepal, where a majority of businesses express an overwhelmingly positive perception towards microfinance institutions (MFIs). The survey focuses mainly on how businesses perceive the services provided by local MFIs. In order to address the bias in maximum likelihood estimation in the context of small sample size, we utilize Firth’s adjusted maximum likelihood estimation procedure in the application of logistic regression. The results show that it is the borrowing of a loan from an MFI, not the actual business performance, which influences a business owner’s perception towards the role of MFIs in various aspects of rural development. While there is no strong evidence of the MFI loans helping with the actual business performance, and thereby influencing the perceptions, we discuss the potential benefits of owning a business that may be contributing to the positive perceptions towards the institutions with which they are associated. These findings have important implications from the managerial perspective of both MFIs and governing institutions in developing countries.

Contribution/ Originality
This study documents how businesses express positive perception towards MFIs because of their membership, not necessarily because they have more favorable business outcomes. Methodologically, the paper uses Firth’s logistic regression to address the bias present in maximum likelihood estimates computed from a small sample, something common in microfinance studies.

Keywords:

Microfinance, Microfinance institutions, Small sample, Firth’s logistic regression, Visualization, Mosaic (Marimekko) plot.

Reference:

Aoki, C., & Pradhan, P. (2013). Impact of microfinance services on socio-economic empowerment of the women’s group in Nepal. Geography of Governance: Dynamics for Local Development, 1, 01-10.

Armendáriz, B., & Morduch, J. (2010). The economics of microfinance. MIT Press.

Ashe, J. (2002). PACT's women's empowerment program in Nepal: A savings-and literacy-led alternative to financial building. Journal of Microfinance/ESR Review, 4(2), 137-162.

Banerjee, A. V. (2013). Microcredit under the microscope: What have we learned in the past two decades, and what do we need to know? Annual Review of Economics, 5(1), 487-519. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-082912-110220.

Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. (2015). The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(1), 22-53.

Carter, T. C., Ye, Z., Ivacic, L. C., Budi, N., Rose, W. E., & Shukla, S. K. (2020). Association of variants in selected genes mediating host immune response with duration of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Genes & Immunity, 20, 240-248. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41435-020-0101-0.

Cheston, S., & Kuhn, L. (2002). Empowering women through microfinance. Draft, Opportunity International, 1-64. Retrieved from: https://rb.gy/v68uq68r.

Copestake, J., Bhalotra, S., & Johnson, S. (2001). Assessing the impact of microcredit: A Zambian case study. Journal of Development Studies, 37(4), 81-100. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380412331322051.

Cox, D. R., & Snell, E. J. (1968). A general definition of residuals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 30(2), 248-265. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1968.tb00724.x.

Firth, D. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80(1), 27-38.

García-Pérez, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2020). Microfinance institutions fostering sustainable development by Region. Sustainability, 12(7), 2682. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072682.

Ghimire, S., Rigatti, T., & Sexton, N. (2017). Effect of credit cooperatives in employment generation: Evidence from rural Nepal. Journal of Development Innovations, 1(1), 29-44.

Ghimire, S., Clifford, D., & Costa, G. (2019). Do microfinance institutions help with business expansion? Evidence from Rural Nepal. Academy of Economics and Finance Journal, 10, 15-24.

Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., & Serrano-Cinca, C. (2019). 20 years of research in microfinance: An information management approach. International Journal of Information Management, 47, 183-197. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.001.

Heinze, G., & Puhr, R. (2010). Bias-reduced and separation-proof conditional logistic regression with small or sparse data sets. Statistics in Medicine, 29, 770 - 777. Available at: 10.1002/sim.3794.

Heinze, G., & Schemper, M. (2002). A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2409-2419.

Hulme, D. (2000). Impact assessment methodologies for microfinance: theory, experience and better practice. World Development, 28(1), 79-98.

Khandker, S. R. (2005). Microfinance and poverty: Evidence using panel data from Bangladesh. The World Bank Economic Review, 19(2), 263-286. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhi008.

Kulkarni, V. S., Azam, M. S., & Gaiha, R. (2017). Credit, microfinance, and empowerment. In Microfinance for Entrepreneurial Development (pp. 127-152). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Magalhães, T. M., Gómez, Y. M., Gallardo, D. I., & Venegas, O. (2020). Bias reduction for the marshall-olkin extended family of distributions with application to an airplane’s air conditioning system and precipitation data. Symmetry, 12(5), 1-14.

McKenzie, D. (2012). Beyond baseline and follow-up: The case for more T in experiments. Journal of development Economics, 99(2), 210-221.

Melik, J. (2010). Microcredit 'death trap' for Bangladesh's poor.: Business Daily, BBC World Service.

Morduch, J., & Haley, B. (2002). Analysis of the effects of microfinance on poverty reduction. New York: NYU Wagner Working Paper, 1014.

Ngala, C. O. (2017). Microfinance and income levels of AIDS affected households: A Quasi-experimental survey. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 50-60.

Oluyombo, O. O., & Iriobe, G. O. (2017). Microfinance impact assessment methodologies: Is it qualitative, quantitative or both?. In Microfinance for Entrepreneurial Development (pp. 153-168). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Peters, C. (2017). Microfinance and female group action in Bangladesh. Review of Development Economics, 21(1), 21-42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12238.

Quinones, B., & Remenyi, J. (2014). Microfinance and poverty alleviation: Case studies from Asia and the Pacific: Routledge.

Rainey, C., & McCaskey, K. (2015). Estimating logit models with small samples. Austin, Texas: Texas A&M.

Rajbanshi, R., Huang, M., & Wydick, B. (2015). Measuring microfinance: Assessing the conflict between practitioners and researchers with evidence from Nepal. World Development, 68, 30-47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.011.

Sharma, P. R. (2007). Micro-finance and women empowerment. Journal of Nepalese Business Studies, 4(1), 16-27.

Tuman, J. P., & Erlingsson, H. (2020). The determinants of Chinese Foreign direct investment flows in Mexican States, 2004–2014. Latin American Policy, 11(1), 103-125.

Vanroose, A. (2016). Which factors drive the regional expansion of microfinance institutions? Evidence from Peru. Journal of International Development, 28(7), 1104-1122.

Weiss, J., & Montgomery, H. (2005). Great expectations: Microfinance and poverty reduction in Asia and Latin America. Oxford Development Studies, 33(3-4), 391-416. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810500199210.