Contact Us

For Marketing, Sales and Subscriptions Inquiries
2637 E Atlantic Blvd #43110
Pompano Beach, FL 33062

Conference List

International Journal of Geography and Geology

February 2015, Volume 4, 2, pp 24-36

An Estimate of the Tensile Strength Based On P-Wave Velocity and Schmidt Hardness Rebound Number

Mehdi Hosseini


Danial Shirin

Mehdi Hosseini 1

Danial Shirin 2

  1. Assistant Professor, department of Mining Engineering, Imam khomeini International University, Ghazvin, Iran 1

  2. Student, department of Mining Engineering, Imam khomeini International University, Ghazvin, Iran 2

Pages: 24-36

DOI: 10.18488/journal.10/2015.4.2/

Share :


Tunnels, roads, bridges, dams, power plants, etc., are constructed in rock formation. Various rock parameters are important for the design of these structures such as compressive and tensile strengths of the embedded rocks. Preparation of samples and performing uniaxial and Brazilian tensile tests require a lot of time and money; and they are not operable in all samples. Therefore, much easier and less costly methods are used to determine tensile strength. Schmidt hammer and sound velocity tests are among these simple and inexpensive tests. Another advantage of these tests is that they are non-destructive and operable in the deserts. The main objective of this study was to obtain the relationship between the sound velocity, the Schmidt hammer rebound number and the tensile strength. This study was conducted on samples of sandstone, tuff, marble, limestone, red sandstone and marl. Simple and multivariate regression models were used to obtain this relationship. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and value account for (VAF) were determined to control the performance of provided equations. These two indices were equal to 2.20 and 46.5 in the relation between the sound velocity and the tensile strength; and they were equal to 0.09 and 81.49 in the relation between the Schmidt hardness rebound number and the tensile strength when the simple regression analysis was used, while they were equal to 0.24 and 80.91 when multivariate regression analysis.

Contribution/ Originality
This study is one of very few studies which have investigated the relationship between the sound velocity, the Schmidt hammer rebound number and the tensile strength. This study documents that tensile strength can be estimated with a high level of accuracy by using the proposed equations. 




  1. Abbasi, M., 2011. Determination of uniaxial compressive strength of limestone using the point load and schmidt hammer tests. Seventh Conference of Engineering Geology and the Environment.
  2. Arjomand Pour, J. and V. Hosseini Tudeshaki, 2013. Evaluation of indirect methods to estimate the tensile strength (Brazilian) of the Elika Formation limestones. International Conference on Civil Engineering, Tabriz.
  3. Atapour, H., 2012. Performance evaluation of the new method presented for estimating the tensile strength of rocks. The Fourth Iranian Mining Engineering Conference.
  4. Fahimifar, A. and H. Soroush, 2001. Rock mechanics tests (Laboratory Tests), technical and soil mechanics laboratory, ministry of roads and urban development. Prof. Hessabi Press., Amirkabir University of Technology (Tafresh Branch).
  5. Ghorbani Saber, A. and M.H. Ghobadi, 2011. Estimating the uniaxial compressive strength and tensile strength (Brazilian) of limestone using the point load index (Case Study). Fifth National Conference on Earthquake, Payam-e- Noor University.
  6. Gurocak, Z., P. Solanki, S. Alemdag and M. Zaman, 2012. New considerations for empirical estimation of tensile strength of rocks. Engineering Geology, 145-146: 1-8.
  7. Hadian Fard, M.A. and S. Jafari, 2012. Evaluation of the compressive strength of concrete by ultrasonic testing method using exponential function fitting. The Second National Conference on Structures, Earthquake and Geo-technics.
  8. Heidari, M., F. Aliani, M. Sadeghi and F. Nasseri, 2011. Estimation of granitoid fragility in the samen district using non-destructive tests (P-Wave Velocity and Schmidt Hammer). 15th Symposium of Geological Society of Iran.
  9. Hosseini, M., 2006. An introduction to the rock mechanics. Ide-Gostar Press.
  10. Hosseini, M., B. Ali Panahi and S. Sanmarr, 2012. An estimate of the marl engineering properties using the punch testing. Quarterly of Applied Geology, 8(4) 309-322.
  11. Kahraman, S., M. Fener and E. Kozman, 2012. Predicting the compressive and tensile strength of rocks from indentation hardness index. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 112(5): 331-339.
  12. Khandelwal, M., 2013. Correlating P-wave velocity with the physico-mechanical properties of different rocks. Pure Appl. Geophys, 170(4): 507–514.
  13. Kohno, M. and H. Maeda, 2012. Relationship between point load strength index and uniaxial compressive strength of hydrothermally altered soft rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 50: 147-157.
  14. Luke, M. and P. Snell, 2012. Using the rebound hammer. Proceedings of The 11th Annual Mongolian Concrete Conference.
  15. Minaeian, B. and K. Ahangari, 2011. Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength based on P-wave and schmidt hammer rebound using statistical method. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6(6): 1925-1931.
  16. Noferesti, H. and R. Heydari, 2012. Measurement of the concrete strength by the ultrasonic and schmidt hammer non-destructive tests. 1st National Conference of Concrete Industry.
  17. RILEM Publications SARL, 2002. A tribute to Fernando L. L. B. Carneiro (1913-2001). Engineer and Scientist who Invented the Brazilian Test, 35(247): 195–196.


Google Scholor ideas Microsoft Academic Search bing Google Scholor


Competing Interests:


Related Article