International Journal of Business, Economics and Management

Published by: Conscientia Beam
Online ISSN: 2312-0916
Print ISSN: 2312-5772
Quick Submission    Login/Submit/Track

No. 6

Comparative Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Milk Production Systems in Uasin Gishu County of Kenya

Pages: 157-168
Find References

Finding References


Comparative Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Milk Production Systems in Uasin Gishu County of Kenya

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search
Cite

DOI: 10.18488/journal.62/2015.2.6/62.6.157.168

Michael B. Kibiego , Job K. Lagat , Bockline O. Bebe

Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS

  1. Ajibefun, I.A. and A.G. Daramola, 2003. Determinants of technical and allocative efficiency of micro-enterprises: Firm-level evidence from Nigeria. African Development Review, 15(2-3): 353–395.
  2. Alemdar, T., B. Bahadir and M.N. Oren, 2010. Cost and return analysis and technical efficiency of small scale milk production: A case study for Cukurova region, Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9(4): 844-847.
  3. Alvarez, A., J. Corral, D. Solís and J.A. Pérez, 2008. Does intensification improve the economic efficiency of dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 91(9): 3693-3698.
  4. Baltenweck, S., J. Staal, M. Owango, H. Muriuki, B. Lukuyu, G. Gichungu, M. Kenyanjui, D. Njubi, J. Tanner and W. Thorpe, 2000. Intensification and competitiveness of small holder dairy production systems in the greater Nairobi milk-shed. Kenya Agricultural Research Institute/Ministry of Agriculture/International Livestock Research Institute Report, Nairobi, Kenya. pp: 11.
  5. Battese, G.E., 1992. Frontier production functions and technical efficiency: A survey of empirical applications in agricultural economics. Agricultural Econonics Journal, 7(1): 185–208.
  6. Bravo-Ureta, B.E., V.H. Moreira, A.A. Arzubi, E.D. Schilder, J. Alvarez and M. C., 2008. Technological change and technical efficiency for dairy farms in three countries of South America. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Resource, 68(1): 360-367.
  7. Coelli, T.J., 1996. A guide to DEAP version 2.1: A data envelopment analysis (Computer) program. Center for efficiency and productivity analysis (CEPA). Working paper No. 96/08. Armidale, Australia: University of New England. pp: 50.
  8. Cuesta, R.A., 2000. A production model with firm-specific temporal variation in technical inefficiency: With application to Spanish dairy farms. Journal of Production Analysis, 13(1): 139-158.
  9. Galanopoulos, K., S. Aggelopoulos, I. Kamenidou and K. Mattas, 2006. Assessing the effects of managerial and production practices on the efficiency of commercial pig farming. Agricultural Systems, 88(1): 125-141.
  10. Henningsen, A., 2012. Estimating censored regression models in R using the censreg package. Denmark: Institute of Food and Resource Economics. University of Copenhagen. pp: 12.
  11. Igbekele, A., 2003. Determinants of technical inefficiency in farm production: The case of  nde farmers in Ondo State, Nigeria. Western Agricultural Economics Association, Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 2003, Denver, Colorado. Available from http://purl.umn.edu/35998. [Accessed 29/01/2015].
  12. Kumbhakar, S. and K. Lovell, 2000. Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Lovo, S., 2013. Pension transfers and farm household technical efficiency: Evidence from South Africa. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(5): 1391-1405.
  14. Manoharan, R., K.N. Selvakumar and S.P. Serma, 2004. Efficiency of milk production in pondicherry: A frontier production approach. Indian Journal of Animal Resources, 38(1): 20-24.
  15. Michalickova, M., Z. Krupova and E. Krupa, 2013. Technical efficiency and its determinants in dairy cattle. Acta Oeconomica et Informatica, 14(1): 2–12.
  16. Murova, O. and B. Chidmi, 2009. Impacts of federal government programs and specific farm variables on technical efficiency of dairy farms. A Paper Presented at the 2009 Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia. Available from Http://Purl.Umn.Edu/46822.
  17. Nanyeenya, W.N., J. Mugisha, S.J. Staal, D.I. Baltenweck Romney and N. Halberg, 2008. Dairy performance and intensification under traditional and economic efficiency farm plans in Uganda. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 3(2): 82-89.
  18. Nganga, S.K., J. Kungu, N. De Ridder and M. Herrero, 2010. Profit Efficiency among Kenyan smallholder milk producers: A case study of Meru-South district, Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(4): 332-337.
  19. Ooms, D.L., 2007. Micro-economic panel data models for Dutch dairy farming. Phd Thesis, Wageningen University. pp: 134.
  20. Qushim, B., J. Gillespie and R.F. Nehring, 2013. Scale economies and economic performance in Southeastern U.S. Cow-Calf production. Southern Association of Agricultural Economists Annual Conference, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida.
  21. Tauer, L.W., 1998. Productivity of New York dairy farms measured by nonparametric malquist indices. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(1): 234-249.
  22. Tauer, L.W. and K.P. Belbase, 1987. Technical efficiency of New York dairy farms. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 16(1): 10-16.
  23. Tauer, L.W. and A.K. Mishra, 2006. Dairy farm cost efficiency. Journal of Dairy Science, 89(1): 4937-4943.
Michael B. Kibiego , Job K. Lagat , Bockline O. Bebe (2015). Comparative Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Milk Production Systems in Uasin Gishu County of Kenya. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 2(6): 157-168. DOI: 10.18488/journal.62/2015.2.6/62.6.157.168
In Uasin Gishu County the rapidly declining household land sizes are a pre-requisite to increased intensification in dairy production. Although the three dairy production pathways are used by farmers in the County, it has not been established which one of them would be comparatively competitive to enhance commercialization process and lead to attractive returns to smallholders investing in milk production. The objective of this paper was to determine the economic efficiency of smallholder milk production under different intensification methods. A sample size of 246 smallholder dairy farmers was selected in Uasin Gishu County using stratified random sampling method. Using both primary and secondary data, economic efficiencies were evaluated utilizing Cobb-Douglas stochastic frontier production function. The result of the analysis indicate that presence of technical inefficiencies had effects in milk production as depicted by the significant estimated gamma coefficient of each model, the generalized likelihood ratio test and the predicted economic efficiencies within the dairy farms. Technical efficiency increased with the level of intensification of milk production with open grazing, semi-zero grazing and zero grazing recording a mean score of 0.54, 0.57 and 0.81 respectively. The maximum likelihood estimates for technical efficiency was an increasing function of cost of feeds and equipment in the three production systems with statistical significance of 5%. Market access condition the technical efficiency of milk production especially for this highly perishable product. Educational opportunities for farmers lead to initiative, innovation and improvements. There is need to increase the level of intensification in milk production to enhance technical efficiency.
Contribution/ Originality
This study contributes in the existing literature on competitiveness. It uses new estimation methodology for estimating technical efficiency. It is one of very few studies which have investigated livestock performance. The paper contributes the first logical analysis of   efficiency and this increased with intensification. This study documents milk production efficiency.