International Journal of Business, Economics and Management

Published by: Conscientia Beam
Online ISSN: 2312-0916
Print ISSN: 2312-5772
Quick Submission    Login/Submit/Track

No. 4

The Total Factor Productivity of Libyan Banks, 2004 – 2010

Pages: 100-119
Find References

Finding References


The Total Factor Productivity of Libyan Banks, 2004 – 2010

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search
Cite

DOI: 10.18488/journal.62/2015.2.4/62.4.100.119

Citation: 1

Khalad M. S. Alrafadi , Badrul Hisham Kamaruddin , Mazila Md Yusuf

Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS

  1. Ataullah, A., T. Cockerill and H. Le, 2004. Financial liberalization and bank efficiency: A comparative analysis of India and Pakistan. Applied Economics, 36(17): 1915?1924.
  2. Ausina, E.T., E. Grifell-Tatje, C. Armero and D. Conesa, 2008. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency and Malmquist productivity indices: An application to Spanish savings banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(3): 1062 – 1084.
  3. Bauer, P.W., A.N. Berger, G.D. Ferrier and D.B. Humphrey, 1998. Consistency conditions for regulatory analysis of financial institutions: A comparison of frontier efficiency methods. Journal of Economics and Business, 50(2): 85 –114.
  4. Berg, S., F. Forsund, L. Hjalmarsson and M. Suominen, 1993. Banking efficiency in the Nordic countries. Journal of Banking and Finance, 17(2): 71 – 388.
  5. Berger, A.N. and R. De Young, 1997. Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial .Banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 21(6): 849 - 870.
  6. Berger, A.N. and D.B. Humphrey, 1997. Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2): 175-212.
  7. Canhoto, A. and J. Dermine, 2003. A note on banking efficiency in Portugal: New vs. old banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(11): 2087?2098.
  8. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6): 429– 444.
  9. Coelli, T., 1996. A guide to DEAP version 2.1 : A data envelopment analysis (Computer) program. Center for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), Deparment of Econometrics, the University of New England, Armidale, Australia (WP8/96).
  10. Colwell, R.J. and E.P. Davis, 1992. Output and productivity in banking. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94: 111?129.
  11. Cooper, W.W., L.M. Seiford and K. Tone, 2007. Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. 2nd Edn., New York: Springer.
  12. Deng, Q., W.P. Wong, H.C. Wooi and M.C. Xiong, 2011. An engineering method to measure the bank productivity effect in Malaysia during 2001-2008. Systems Engineering Procedia, 2: 1 – 11.
  13. Drake, L., M.J.B. Hall and R. Simper, 2009. Bank modelling methodologies: A comparative non-parametric analysis of efficiency in the Japanese banking sector. Journal of International Financial Markets, 19(1): 1 – 15.
  14. EL Moussawi, C. and H. Obeid, 2011. Evaluating the productive efficiency of islamic banking in GCC: A non- parametric approach. International Management Review, 7(1): 10 – 21.
  15. Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang, 1994. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84(1): 66 – 83.
  16. Fujii, H., S. Managi and R. Matousek, 2014. Indian bank efficiency and productivity changes with undesirable outputs: A disaggregated approach. Journal of Banking& Finance, 38(1): 41 – 50.
  17. Hassan, M.K., A. Al-Sharkas and A. Samad, 2004. An empirical study of relative efficiency of the banking industry in Bahrain. Studies in Economics and Finance, 22(2): 40 -69.
  18. Isik, I., 2007. Bank ownership and productivity developments: Evidence from Turkey. Studies in Economics and Finance, 24(2): 115?139.
  19. Manadhar, R. and J. Tang, 2002. The evaluation of bank branch performance using data envelopment analysis: A framework. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13(1): 1-17.
  20. Matthews, K. and N. Zhang, 2010. Bank productivity in China 1997–2007: Measurement and convergence. China Economic Review, 21(4): 617- 628.
  21. Mireles, I., S. Ogilvie and R. Shedid, 2009. Libya. Available from http://fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/africa/Libya%20Final.pdf [Accessed 13 Jan. 2012].
  22. Mohammed, S.A., 2002. Finance-growth nexus in Sudan: Empirical assessment based on an application of the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model. Arab planning. Institute in Kuwait, API/WPS 0803.
  23. Mostafa, M., 2007. Benchmarking top Arab banks efficiency through efficient frontier analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(6): 802 – 823.
  24. Norman, M. and B. Stoker, 1991. Data envelopment analysis: The assessment of performance. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  25. Panorama Report, 2008. Modernizing the banking sector and investing globally, Libya. Available from http://www.panoramareportsltd.com/pdf/libya.pdf [Accessed 20 Feb 2012].
  26. Percin, S. and T.Y. Ayan, 2006. Measuring efficiency of commercial banks in a developing economy: The case of Turkey. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 3(2): 217 – 231.
  27. Sealey, C. and J.T. Lindley, 1977. Inputs, outputs and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions. Journal of Finance, 32(4): 1251-1266.
  28. Shih, J.S., W. Harrington, W.A. Pizer and K. Gillingham, 2004. Economics of scale and technical efficiency in community water system. Discussion paper. Available from http://www.rff.org [Accessed 1 Feb 2012].
  29. Sufian, F., 2007. The efficiency of islamic banking industry in Malaysia foreign vs domestic banks. Humanomics, 23(3): 174–192.
  30. Sufian, F., 2009. Determinants of bank efficiency during unstable macroeconomic environment: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Research in International Business and Finance, 23(1): 54–77.
  31. Sufian, F., 2011. Benchmarking the efficiency of the Korean banking sector: A DEA.approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 8(1): 107 – 127.
  32. Wu, D., Z. Yang and L. Liang, 2006. Using DEA-neural network approach to evaluate branchefficiency of a large Canadian bank. Expert Systems With Applications, 31(1): 108-115.
  33. Zhu, J., 2003. Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spread sheets and DEA excel solver. Massachusetts, USA: Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
Khalad M. S. Alrafadi , Badrul Hisham Kamaruddin , Mazila Md Yusuf (2015). The Total Factor Productivity of Libyan Banks, 2004 – 2010. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 2(4): 100-119. DOI: 10.18488/journal.62/2015.2.4/62.4.100.119
This paper presents a comparative analysis of the performance of 17 Libyan banks during the period 2004 - 2010. According to the relevant literature, there are few studies that measure both technical efficiency and Malmquist productivity index approach using non – parametric approach (DEA) for the banking sector in Libya. In this study, we used the DEA technique to calculate technical, pure technical, and scale efficiency of sampled banks by using DEAP software. The findings showed that higher mean technical efficiency of specialized banks comparing with commercial and private banks.  This paper concludes with some policy implications of the results.  The results for total factor productivity (TFP) showed 11 of 17 Libyan banks decline because TFP levels of banks drawn by negative technical efficiency change (less than 1) or by negative technological change, or both of them are negative.
Contribution/ Originality
This study contributes in the existing literature and to provide practical contribution to practitioners who implement financial initiatives in Libya such as financial managers, policy makers, strategists and financial specialists and analysts. Also, this study is one of very few studies which have investigated in Arab Countries particularly in Libya.

Effects of Advertising on Consumer Behavior in Low Density Houses: The Case of Marlborough, Zimbabwe

Pages: 91-99
Find References

Finding References


Effects of Advertising on Consumer Behavior in Low Density Houses: The Case of Marlborough, Zimbabwe

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search
Cite

DOI: 10.18488/journal.62/2015.2.4/68.4.91.99

Citation: 4

Alice Z Zinyemba , Irvine Manase

Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS

  1. Africa Media Development Initiative: Research Summary Report, 2010. BBC world trust: 47.
  2. Ayanwale, A.B., T. Alimi and Ayanbimipe, 2005. The influence of advertising on consumer brand preference. Journal of Social Science, 10(1): 9-16.
  3. Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries Manufacturing Survey, 2014. Taking industry to next level. The Financial Gazette: 18.
  4. Jalees, T., 2006. Brand personification of Mobilink, U Phone, Telenor, and Warid. Journal of Research Market Forces, 2(2): 50-76.
  5. Kotler, P. and K. Keller, 2011. Marketing management. 14th Edn., London: Pearson Education.
  6. Milner, D., 1995. Advertising & promotion. 1st Edn., London: University Press.
  7. Romaniuk, J. and B. Sharp, 2004. Conceptualizing and measuring brand salience. Marketing Theory Articles, 4(4): 327-342.
Alice Z Zinyemba , Irvine Manase (2015). Effects of Advertising on Consumer Behavior in Low Density Houses: The Case of Marlborough, Zimbabwe. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 2(4): 91-99. DOI: 10.18488/journal.62/2015.2.4/68.4.91.99
This paper presents findings of a research that was carried out to establish the buying behavior of low density households in Zimbabwe and how they are influenced by the various forms of advertising. A questionnaire was administered to a sample of 75 respondents representing 75 households in Marlborough, Harare. The results of the study showed that 50% of the respondents strongly agreed that their decision to purchase a product was influenced by advertisements.  They also indicated that they understood and preferred outdoor media more than television and print media which came second and third respectively in the order of preference. More than 75% of the respondents agreed that they bought advertised products more than those which are not advertised. The results also showed that consumers in Zimbabwe are slow in accepting and adopting the internet as a form of advertising. It can be concluded from this study that it definitely pays to advertise one’s products. It is also important that an advert should carry a strong message that is convincing to the consumers as indicated by 50% of the respondents. It can also be concluded that the Zimbabwean market has not yet fully embraced online advertising. The study recommends that outdoor media should be used more than any other forms of advertising in low density areas as it is the most preferred and most understood media choice. It is also recommended that since more women than men do the purchases for households in low density areas advertisements should target women more than men.
Contribution/ Originality
This study contributes to existing literature on consumer buying behavior. It shows that the most preferred and understood media choice for advertising products among high income earners in countries like Zimbabwe is outdoor media. Since women more than men do the purchases for households advertisements should target women more.