International Journal of Business, Economics and Management

Published by: Conscientia Beam
Online ISSN: 2312-0916
Print ISSN: 2312-5772
Quick Submission    Login/Submit/Track

No. 3

Managerial Judgement Versus Financial Techniques in Strategic Investment Decisions: An Empirical Study on the Syrian Coastal Region Firms

Pages: 31-43
Find References

Finding References


Managerial Judgement Versus Financial Techniques in Strategic Investment Decisions: An Empirical Study on the Syrian Coastal Region Firms

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search
Cite

DOI: 10.18488/journal.62/2016.3.3/62.3.31.43

Oubay Mahmoud

Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS

  1. Amram, M. and N. Kulatilaka, 1999. Real options: Managing strategic investment in an uncertain world. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  2. Arnold, G.C., 2002. Corporate financial management. 2nd Edn., Harlow: Pearson Education.
  3. Arnold, G.C. and P.D. Hatzopoulos, 2000. The theory-practice gap in capital budgeting: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 27(5 & 6): 603- 626.
  4. Busby, J.S. and C.G. Pitts, 1998. Assessing flexibility in capital investment. London: CIMA.
  5. Carr, C., K. Kolehmainen and F. Mitchell, 2010. Strategic investment decision-making practices: A contextual approach. Management Accounting Research, 21(3): 167-184.
  6. Carr, C. and C. Tomkins, 1998. Context, culture and the role of the finance function in strategic decisions. A comparative analysis of Britain, Germany, the U.S. and Japan. Management Accounting Research, 9(2): 213-239.
  7. Clarke, I., W. Mackaness and B. Ball, 2003. Modelling intuition in retail site assessment (MIRSA): Making sense of retail location using retailers intuitive judgements as a support for decision-making. International Review of Retail, Distribution & Consumer Research, 13(2): 175-194.
  8. Copeland, T.E. and T.K. Keenan, 1998. How much is flexibility worth? McKinsey Quarterly, McKinsey & Company, No.2.
  9. Covin, J.G., D.P. Slevin and M.B. Heeley, 2001. Strategic decision making in an intuitive vs. Technocratic mode: Structural and environmental considerations. Journal of Business Research, 52(1): 51-67.
  10. Dixit, A.K. and R.S. Pindyck, 1995. The options approach to capital investment. Harvard Business Review, 73(3): 105-115.
  11. Drury, C. and M. Tayles, 1997. The misapplication of capital investment appraisal techniques. Management Decision, 35(2): 86-95.
  12. Dyson, R.G., 1990. Strategic planning: Models and analytical techniques. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Gotze, U., D. Northcott and P. Schuster, 2015. Investment appraisal: Methods and models. 2nd Edn., Berlin: Springer.
  14. Harris, E., C. Emmanuel and S. Komakech, 2009. Managerial judgement and strategic investment decisions: A cross-sectional survey. Oxford: UK: CIMA.
  15. Harris, E.P., 1999. Project risk assessment: A European field study. British Accounting Review, 31(3): 347- 371.
  16. Ho, S.S.M. and R.H. Pike, 1991. Risk analysis in capital budgeting contexts: Simple or sophisticated? Accounting and Business Research, 21(83): 227-238.
  17. Kaplan, R.S., 1986. Must CIM be justified by faith alone? Harvard Business Review, 64(2): 87-95.
  18. Kaplan, R.S. and A.A. Atkinson, 1998. Advanced management accounting. International edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  19. Kester, W.C., 1984. Today’s options for tomorrow’s growth. Harvard Business Review, 62(2): 153- 161.
  20. Krinsky, I. and J. Miltenburg, 1991. Alternate method for the justification of advanced manufacturing technologies. International Journal of Production Research, 29(5): 997-1015.
  21. Kulatilaka, N. and J. Marcus, 1992. Project valuation under uncertainty: When does DCF fail? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 5(3): 92-100.
  22. Lefly, F., 1997. The sometimes overlooked discounted payback method. Management Accounting, 75(10): 36-38
  23. Lumby, S. and C. Jones, 1999. Investment appraisal and financial decision. 6th Edn., London: Thomson.
  24. Mahmoud, O., 2008. Managerial judgement and the real options approach in the investment appraisal process: Evidence from the British automotive components manufacturers. PhD Thesis, Bournemouth University Business School, UK.
  25. Maylor, H., 1999. Project management. 2nd Edn., London: Financial Times.
  26. Mcgrath, R.G., W.J. Ferrier and A.L. Mendelow, 2004. Real options as engines of choice and heterogeneity. Academy of Management Review, 29(1): 86-101.
  27. Mcintyre, A.D. and N.J. Coulthurst, 1986. Capital budgeting practices in medium-sized business-a survey. London: CIMA.
  28. Megginson, W., S. Smart and L. Gitman, 2007. Corporate finance. 2nd Edn., Mason, USA: Thomson Education.
  29. Morone, J. and A. Paulson, 1991. Cost of capital: The managerial perspective. California Management Review, 33(4): 9-32.
  30. Neuman, W.L., 2000. Social research methods. 2nd Edn., London: Ally & Bacon.
  31. Northcott, D., 1995. Capital investment decision-making. London: Dryden Press.
  32. Pike, R. and B. Neale, 2006. Corporate finance and investment: Decisions & strategies. 5th Edn., Harlow: Prentice Hall.
  33. Pike, R.H., 1996. A longitudinal study of capital budgeting practices. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23(1): 79-92.
  34. Rohrick, M., 2007. Fundamentals of investment appraisal: An illustration based on a case study. Munchen: Oldenbourg.
  35. Sangster, A., 1993. Capital investment appraisal techniques: A survey of current usage. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 20(3): 307-332.
  36. Saunders, M., P. Lewis and A. Thornhill, 2007. Research methods for business students. 4th Edn., Essex: Prentice Hall.
  37. Serfas, S., 2011. Cognitive biases in the capital investment context. Germany: Gabler.
  38. Sharp, D.J., 1991. Uncovering the hidden value in high-risk investments. Sloan Management Review, 32(4): 69-74.
  39. Smart, A.U., P. Barrar, A.M. Mccosh and A.A. Lloyd, 2002. Incorporating competitive advantage into the process technology investment decision. Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 4(5): 401-419.
  40. Stark, A.W., 2000. Reap options, (Dis) investment decision-making and accounting measures of performance. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 27(3 & 4): 313- 329.
Oubay Mahmoud (2016). Managerial Judgement Versus Financial Techniques in Strategic Investment Decisions: An Empirical Study on the Syrian Coastal Region Firms. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 3(3): 31-43. DOI: 10.18488/journal.62/2016.3.3/62.3.31.43
While there has been extensive research on the use of financial appraisal techniques [Pay Back (PB), Return on Capital Employed (ROCE), Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Net Present Value (NPV)] in Strategic Investment Decisions (SIDs), little research has been conducted on the role of the Managerial Judgement factors (MJ factors) – past experience, intuition and own judgement - in the SIDs. In practice, many investments are undertaken on the basis of financial returns with little or no analysis of the growth options embedded in the proposed investments. Essential to considering these options in the SIDs is the deployment of MJ factors in the SIDs. This research draws on a 36-firm survey of finance directors in Syrian coastal region firms to set out the relative importance of the MJ factors and financial techniques in the SIDs. The findings from the survey show high usage of the MJ factors in the SIDs but not at the expense of the financial techniques usage which are used regardless of the MJ adoption in the SIDs. However, There is a tendency towards using MJ factors more than financial techniques for investments with growth options. There is no relationship between neither the ownership nor the sector with the MJ adoption. ROCE and PB are the most frequently used financial techniques.

Contribution/ Originality
This study contributes to capital budgeting literature through identifying the relative importance of the managerial judgement compared to financial techniques when assessing new investments, especially when these new investments have strategic and non-quantifiable returns. It shows the crucial role the finance managers can play using their past experience, intuition and own judgement in the strategic investment decision- making process.