S. Basagni, M. Conti, S. Giordano, and I. Stoimenovic, Mobile ad-hoc networks. Piscataway, New Jersey: Wiley-IEEE Press and John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2000.
C. E. Perkins, Ad hoc networking. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman, 2000.
C. K. Toh, Ad hoc mobile wireless networks: Protocols and systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR, 2002.
B. Stefano, M. Conti, S. Glordano, and I. Stojmenovi, Mobile ad hoc networking. New York: IEEE Press and John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
C. Murthy and B. S. Manoj, Ad hoc wireless networks: Architectures and protocols. Wilmington, DE, U.S.A: Prentice Hall, 2004.
E. M. Royer and C. K. Toh, "A review of current routing protocols for ad-hoc mobile wireless networks," IEEE Personal Communications, vol. 6, pp. 46-55, 1999.
C. E. Perkins and P. Bhagwat, "Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers," ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review, vol. 24, pp. 234-244, 1994.
C. E. Perkins, E. M. Royer, and S. R. Das, "Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing, ," presented at the IETF Internet Draft, Draft-Ietf-Manet-Aodv-11.txt, June, 2002.
D. B. Johnson and D. A. Maltz, Dynamic source routing (DSR) in ad-hoc wireless networks, mobile computing, edited by T. Imielinski and H. Korth. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
V. Gupta, S. V. Krishnamurthy, and M. Faloutsos, Improving the performance of TCP in the presence of interacting UDP flows in ad hoc networks, department of computer science and engineering. New York, USA: University of California Press, 2004.
P. Johansson, T. Larsson, N. Hedman, B. Mielczarek, and M. Degermark, "Scenario-based performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks," in Proceedings of the 5th ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Seattle, 1999, pp. 195-206.
M. Petrovic and M. Aboelaze, "Performance of TCP/UDP under ad hoc IEEE 802.11," in Proc. of 10th International Conference on Telecommunications, 2003, pp. 700-708.
H. Zahid Farman, M. Ahmed, M. Najam-Ul-Islam, and H. Javed, "Performance evaluation of TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) and UDP (User Datagram Protocol) over destination sequence distance vector (DSDV) for random waypoint mobility model," World Applied Science Journal, vol. 20, pp. 910-916, 2012.
R. Sharma and K. Gupta, "Comparison based performance analysis of UDP/CBR and TCP/FTP traffic under AODV routing protocol in MANET," International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 56, pp. 28-35, 2012.
P. R. Gundalwar and V. N. Chavan, "Empirical evaluation of TCP and UDP based fundamental ad hoc network routing protocols," International Journal of Applied Engineering and Technology Gundalwar and Chavan, vol. 3, pp. 24-28, 2013.
R. Christian, N. O. Erik, G. Per, and T. Christian, "Interactions between TCP, UDP and routing protocols in wireless multi-hop ad hoc networks," presented at the Proc. IEEE ICPS Workshop on Multi-Hop Ad Hoc Networks: From Theory to Reality (REALMAN’05), 2005.
. C. Singh, T. K. Godder, M. S. Miah, and H. M. A. Awal, "Experimental analysis of UDP performance in mobile ad hoc networks with different routing protocols and varying payload," International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, vol. 2, pp. 107-113, 2011.
No any video found for this article.
Md. Ashek Raihan Mahmud , Md. Mahbubur Rahman , Md. Sipon Miah (2016). Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols for CBR Traffic in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks. Journal of Information, 2(1): 1-9. DOI: 10.18488/journal.104/2016.2.1/188.8.131.52
This paper presents the comparative performance analysis of Ad-Hoc routing protocols: Destination-sequenced distance vector (DSDV), Dynamic source routing (DSR) and Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) based on constant bit rate (CBR) traffic patterns. Simulation results show that firstly, the UDP throughput for DSR routing protocol is largest among the others. Secondly, the routing overload of DSDV and AODV is higher than DSR. Finally, DSDV shows the lowest end-to-end delay for UDP transmission than AODV and DSR.
The paper’s primary contribution is finding that among the three protocols analyzed which routing protocol performs better in given circumstances.