June 2020, Volume 7, 6, pp 375-386
Capability, Contingent fit, Management, Managerial accounting , Control system , Sustainability performance, Strategy.
Acquaah, M. (2013). Management control systems, business strategy and performance: A comparative analysis of family and non-family businesses in a transition economy in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(2), 131-146. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.03.002.
Bedford, D. S., Malmi, T., & Sandelin, M. (2016). Management control effectiveness and strategy: An empirical analysis of packages and systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 51, 12–28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.04.002.
Bowman, C., & Toms, S. (2010). Critical perspectives on accounting accounting for competitive advantage: The resource-based view of the firm and the labour theory of value. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(3), 172–183. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.010.
Burkert, M., Davila, A., Mehta, K., & Oyon, D. (2014). Relating alternative forms of contingency fit to the appropriate methods to test them. Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 6–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.008.
Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3), 127–168.
Eikelenboom, M., & Jong, G. (2019). The impact of dynamic capabilities on the sustainability performance of SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1360–1370. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.013.
Epstein, M. J., Buhovac, A. R., Elkington, J., & Leonard, H. B. D. (2017). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. In Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental and Economic Impacts.
Ganescu, M. C. (2012). Assessing corporate social performance from a contingency theory perspective. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3(12), 999–1004. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00264-x.
Garrett, R. P., Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (2009). Market responsiveness, top management risk taking, and the role of strategic learning as determinants of market pioneering. Journal of Business Research, 62(8), 782-788.
Gerdin, J., & Greve, J. (2004). Forms of contingency fit in management accounting research - A critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3–4), 303–326. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00096-X.
Gerdin, J., & Greve, J. (2008). The appropriateness of statistical methods for testing contingency hypotheses in management accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7–8), 995–1009.
McAdam, R., Miller, K., & McSorley, C. (2019). Towards a contingency theory perspective of quality management in enabling strategic alignment. International Journal of Production Economics, 207, 195-209. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.003.
Miguel, C., Antonio, & Haugan, G. L. (2019). Determinants of maintenance performance: A resource-based view and agency theory approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 51, 33-47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2019.03.001.
Morton, N. A., & Hu, Q. (2008). Implications of the fit between organizational structure and ERP: A structural contingency theory perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 28(5), 391-402.
Obeidat, B. Y., Tarhini, A., Masa'deh, R. e., & Aqqad, N. O. (2017). The impact of intellectual capital on innovation via the mediating role of knowledge management: A structural equation modelling approach. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 8(3-4), 273-298.
Papoutsi, A., & Sodhi, M. S. (2020). Does disclosure in sustainability reports indicate actual sustainability performance? Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 1-10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121049.
Rehman, S.-U., Mohamed, R., & Ayoup, H. (2019). The mediating role of organizational capabilities between organizational performance and its determinants. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 1-30.
Ruivo, P., Oliveira, T., & Neto, M. (2015). Using resource-based view theory to assess the value of ERP commercial-packages in SMEs. Computers in Industry, 73, 105-116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.06.001.
Sandelin, M. (2008). Operation of management control practices as a package—A case study on control system variety in a growth firm context. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 324-343. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.08.002.
Sedera, D., Lokuge, S., Grover, V., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2016). Innovating with enterprise systems and digital platforms: A contingent resource-based theory view. Information & Management, 53(3), 366-379.
Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. (2001). An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource‐based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 907-934.
Theriou, N., Maditinos, D. I., & Theriou, G. (2017). Management control systems and strategy: A resource based perspective. Evidence from Greece. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 10(2), 35-47.
Wang, H., Pan, C., Wang, Q., & Zhou, P. (2020). Assessing sustainability performance of global supply chains: An input-output modeling approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 285(2020), 393-404.
Yu, W., Chavez, R., Feng, M., Wong, C. Y., & Fynes, B. (2020). Green human resource management and environmental cooperation: An ability-motivation-opportunity and contingency perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 224-235. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.06.013.
Zehir, C., Can, E., & Karaboga, T. (2015). Linking entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The role of differentiation strategy and innovation performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 358–367. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.381.