This study aims to measure the quality of health services provided in Lattakia province (Jableh city) from beneficiaries’ perspective, the study sample group is chosen from the families who visited health centers in Jableh during the current crisis across the country. The researcher used the descriptive and analytical approach, a questionnaire was designed and distributed between families who benefited from provided health services in order to measure the quality of provided health services in the mentioned centers. The sample consists of 1100 questionnaire which is about 10% of the sample study group, using random sampling principle, and in order to measure the quality of health services the researcher used the satisfaction of health services beneficiaries model. The data was studied and analyzed using SPSS program. Data analysis showed that health services centers in Jableh city lack quality, depending on the Dimensions of Quality Health Services (tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, empathy, credibility and safety) from the perspective of the beneficiaries of the provided services.
This study is one of very few studies which have investigated the measurement of beneficiaries’ satisfaction with health services provided at Jableh health centers.
Service, Health services, Health, Health system, Health center, Quality services, Satisfaction.
Ibrahim, T., 2009. Economic analysis and investment in medical fields. Algeria: Modern Book Printing House. pp: 18.
Khalid, B.S., 1994. The effectiveness of the quality programs, Saudi ministry of health hospitals. Arab Journal of Administrative Sciences, 2(1): 12.
Mahmoud, J.A.S., 2010. Service marketing. Amman, Jordan: Maysara Printing Houses for Publishing and Distribution. pp: 40.
Mazuz, A. and A.F. Abdul, 2011. Organizational change and its relationship to the overall quality management, health management organizations. University of Saaddahlab Blida Book Publishing. pp: 16.
Ministry of Health, 2015. Syrian Arab Republic,Helath centers Book, Planning Directorate: 23.
Naji, M., 1998. Measuring quality of banking services. Journal of Administrative Sciences, 25(02): 362.
Osama, F., 2008. Evaluating the quality of health care services in higher education hospitals in Syria from patients’ perspective: A model for measuring satisfaction of patients, higher institute for administrative development. Damascus: Damascus University. pp: 64.
Parasuraman, A., V.A. Zeithaml and L.L. Berry, 1985. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4): 41-50. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
Philip, G. and H. Shirley, 1995. The measurement of service quality. UK: A New P-C-P Attributes Model-Ireland.
Qasim, N.A., 2005. The overall quality management in service. Amman, Jordan: Sunrise for Publishing and Distribution. pp: 101-125.
Qasim, N.A.M., 2006. Quality management in services. Amman, Jordan: Sunrise for Publishing and Distribution. pp: 105.
Salah, M.D., 2012. Measuring the quality dimensions of medical services provided in Jordanian government hospitals: Patients and staff perspective. Islamic University Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 20(1): 69 -104.
Salim, I.H., 2009. Satisfaction rate of students of the faculty of economics at the University of Aleppo for administrative and academic performance level of college: A survey. Damascus University Journal of Economic and Legal Sciences, 25(2): 287.
Syed, M.I., A. Amiir and S. Saman, 2009. An assessment of service quality of private hospitals in Pakistan: 45.
Tal’at, A.D., 2016. Heath care service economics. 2nd Edn., Al Quds Library, Al Zaqayek: Egyept. pp: 17.
Thabet, A.E., 2006. Efficiency and quality of logistic services: Basic concepts and measuring and evaluation concepts. Alexandria, Egypt: University Publishing House for Publishing and Distribution. pp: 291.
World Health Organization, 2006. Quality of care-(Process for Making Strategic Choices in Healthsystem), regional office for the Eastern Mediterranean: 9.
This study received no specific financial support.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All authors contributed equally to the conception and design of the study.