The Economics and Finance Letters

Published by: Conscientia Beam
Online ISSN: 2312-430X
Print ISSN: 2312-6310
Quick Submission    Login/Submit/Track

Recent Articles

Money Supply & Growth Nexus: Evidence from Nigeria

Pages: 117-129
Find References

Finding References


Money Supply & Growth Nexus: Evidence from Nigeria

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search
Cite

DOI: 10.18488/journal.29.2021.82.117.129

Onipede, Samuel F , Afiemo, Oghenekaro O , Nduka, Kodili N. , Apinran, Martins O

Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS

Amassona, D., Nwosa, P. I., & Olaiya, S. A. (2011). An appraisal of monetary policy and its effect on macroeconomic stabilization in Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences (JETEMS), 2(3), 232-237.

Ando, A., & Modigliani, F. (1965). The relative stability of monetary velocity and the investment multiplier. The American Economic Review, 55(4), 693-728.

Aslam, A. L. M. (2016). Impact of money supply on Sri Lankan economy: An econometric analysis. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 67, 11-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.67.11 .

Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., & Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 37(2), 149-163. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1975.tb01532.x.

Chaitip, P., Chokethaworn, K., Chaiboonsri, C., & Khounkhalax, M. (2015). Money supply influencing on economic growth-wide phenomena of AEC open region. Procedia Economics and Finance, 24, 108-115. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00626-7.

Chude, N. P., & Chude, D. I. (2016). Impact of broad money supply on Nigerian economic growth. IIARD International Journal of Banking and Finance Research, 2(1), 46-52.

Dingela, S., & Khobai, H. (2017). Dynamic impact of money supply on economic growth in South Africa. An ARDL approach.

El.Seoud, M. S. A. (2014). Testing the relationship between money supply and GDP in Bahrain. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management United Kingdom, 1(5), 1-16.

Emmanuel, U., Udoh, B. E., Prince, A. I., Okoh, J., & Ndu, O. M. (2019). Money supply and inflation rate in Nigeria: The missing link. Humanities, 7(3), 156-166. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.73.2019.73.156.166.

Fisher, I. (1911). Recent changes in price levels and their causes. The American Economic Review, 1(2), 37-45.

Friedman, M. (1969). The optimum quantity of money, and other essays (No. HG538 F866).

Friedman, M., & Meiselman, D. (1963). The relative stability of monetary velocity and the investment multiplier in the United States, 1897-1958.

Galadima, M. D., & Ngada, M. H. (2017). Impact of money supply on economic growth in Nigeria (1981–2015). Dutse Journal of Economics and Development Studies, 3(1), 133-144.

Gbenga, O., James, S. O., & Adeyinka, A. J. (2019). Determinant of private sector credit and its implication on economic growth in Nigeria: 2000-2017. American Economic & Social Review, 5(1), 10-20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46281/aesr.v5i1.242.

Hameed, D. (2010). Impact of monetary policy on gross domestic product (GDP). Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(1), 1348-1361.

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The supply of gold. The Economic Journal, 46(183), 412-418.

Laurenceson, J., & Chai, J. C. (2003). Financial reform and economic development in China: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Law, S. H., Tan, H. B., & Baharumshah, A. Z. (1999). Financial liberalization in ASEAN and the fisher hyphothesis. Journal of Indonesian Economics, 33, 65-86.

Lee, J. M. (2005). Financial intermediation and economic growth: Evidence from Canada. New York: Eastern Economic Association.

Maitra, B. (2011). Anticipated money, unanticipated money and output variations in Singapore. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 9(1), 118-133.

Marshal, I. (2016). The link between money supply and economic growth in Nigeria: An econometric investigation. International Journal of Economics and Business Management, 2(3), 42-51.

Nnanna, O. J. (2001). Monetary policy framework in Africa: The Nigerian experience. Paper presented at the 2001 South African Reserve Bank Conference.

Ogunmuyiwa, M., & Ekone, A. F. (2010). Money supply-economic growth nexus in Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences, 22(3), 199-204.

Oluseyi, A. S., Olasehinde, T. J., & Eweke, G. O. (2017). The impact of money supply on Nigeria economy: A comparison of mixed data sampling (MIDAS) and ARDL approach. EuroEconomica, 36(2), 123-134.

Pesaran, H. H., & Shin, Y. (1998). Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters, 58(1), 17-29.

Pesaran, M. H. (1997). The role of economic theory in modelling the long run. The Economic Journal, 107(440), 178-191. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00151.

Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1998). An autoregressive distributed-lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Econometric Society Monographs, 31, 371-413.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616.

Schumpeter, J. (1991). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Havard University Press.

Taiwo, M. (2012). Impact of injection and withdrawal of money stock on economic growth in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 4(2), 33-42.

Yoga, A. (2015). The dynamic relationship between money supply and economic growth. Economic Journal of Emerging Market, 7(2), 78-92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol7.iss2.art2.

Zapodeanu, D., & Cociuba, M. I. (2010). Linking money supply with the gross domestic product in Romania. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 1(12), 1-50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29302/oeconomica.2010.12.1.50.

No any video found for this article.
Onipede, Samuel F , Afiemo, Oghenekaro O , Nduka, Kodili N. , Apinran, Martins O (2021). Money Supply & Growth Nexus: Evidence from Nigeria. The Economics and Finance Letters, 8(2): 117-129. DOI: 10.18488/journal.29.2021.82.117.129
The study focused on the dynamic impact of the broader money supply (M3) on economic growth (proxied by Purchasing Manager Index) in Nigeria between 2010M1 and 2018M12. The study investigated the long and the short-run relationship between the selected macroeconomics variables including broad money supply (M3); consumer price Index (CPI); Oil price (OIL), external reserves (Rev) and economic growth using, the Autoregressive Distributed lag (ARDL) method. The findings from the study indicate that in the long-run, the relationship between the broad money supply and economic growth is not only significant statistically but also positive in compliance with theory. The error correction coefficient -0.38072 is statistically different from zero and negative in line with a priori expectation. The result shows that deviation from equilibrium between economic growth as proxied by PMI and other predictors is recovered at an average speed of about 38% monthly in the long-term. The implication here is that the Central Bank of Nigeria is encouraged to maintain a steady rate in the growth of its monetary aggregates, in such a way that is consistent with economic growth. This, of course, is to serve as a complementary policy measure to government’s Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (ERGP).
Contribution/ Originality
This study is adding to the existing literature on the subject matter in Nigeria by deploying a new data on the broader money supply, M3 that was recently introduced in the country. The work is around the first study to investigate the role of M3 on growth in Nigeria with Auto regressive distributed lag (ARDL) technique.

Analysis of Synergies in Indian Corporate M&A Deals: A Logit Regression Approach

Pages: 130-141
Find References

Finding References


Analysis of Synergies in Indian Corporate M&A Deals: A Logit Regression Approach

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search
Cite

DOI: 10.18488/journal.29.2021.82.130.141

Anjala Kalsie , Neha Singh

Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS

Akbulut, M. E., & Matsusaka, J. G. (2010). 50+ years of diversification announcements. Financial Review, 45(2), 231–262. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2010.00245.x.

Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models (Vol. 160). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Andrade, G., Mitchell, M., & Stafford, E. (2001). New evidence and perspectives on mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 103–120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.2.103.

Asquith, P. R., Robert, F. B., & David, M. (1987). Merger returns and the form of financing. Unpublished Working Paper, Harvard Business School.

Bae, K.-H., Kang, J.-K., & Kim, J.-M. (2000). Tunneling or value addition? Evidence from mergers by Korean business groups. Michigan State University Working Paper.

Barai, P., & Mohanty, P. (2014). Role of industry relatedness in performance of Indian acquirers—long and short run effects. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(4), 1045–1073. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9372-1.

Bernile, G., & Lyandres, E. (2019). The effects of horizontal merger operating efficiencies on rivals, customers, and suppliers. Review of Finance, 23(1), 117–160. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfy017.

Betton, S., Eckbo, B. E., & Thorburn, K. S. (2008). Corporate takeovers. In: Eckbo, B.E. (Ed.), Handbook of Corporate Finance, Empirical Corporate Finance (Vol. 2, pp. 291-429). North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Bhoi, B. (2000). Mergers and acquisitions: An Indian experience. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, 21(1), 133-166.

Bose, S. (2014). Mergers and acquisitions: A popular tool for financial and operating synergy in the era of modern economy. Sai Om Journal of Commerce & Management, 1(6), 23-29.

Bouwman, C. H., Fuller, K., & Nain, A. S. (2009). Market valuation and acquisition quality: Empirical evidence. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 633-679. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm073.

Bruner, R. (2002). Does M&A pay? A survey of evidence for the decision-maker. Journal of Applied Finance, 12(1), 48-68.

Buono, A. F. (2002). Seam-less post-merger integration strategies: A cause for concern. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(1), 90-98.

Chatterjee, S. (1986). Types of synergy and economic value: The impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms. Strategic Management Journal, 7(2), 119-139. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070203.

Christian, C., & Jones, J. P. (2004). The value-relevance of earnings, operating cash flows, and Ebitda during mergers. Journal of Accounting & Finance Research, 12(3), 32-44.

Dickerson, A. P., Gibson, H. D., & Tsakalotos, E. (1997). The impact of acquisitions on company performance: Evidence from a large panel of UK firms. Oxford Economic Papers, 49(3), 344–361. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a028613.

Duppati, G. R., & Rao, N. V. (2015). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions: Mature markets vs. emerging markets—with special reference to the USA and India. Cogent Business and Management, 2(1), 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1088817.

Franks, J. R., & Harris, R. S. (1989). Shareholder wealth effects of corporate takeovers: The UK experience 1955–1985. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(2), 225-249. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(89)90057-3.

Franks, J. R., Harris, R. S., & Mayer, C. (1988). Means of payment in takeovers: Results for the United Kingdom and the United States. Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences, 1, 221-264.

Ghosh, A. (2001). Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions? Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(2), 151–178. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00018-9.

Godbole, P. G. (2013). Mergers , acquisitions and corporate restructuring (2nd ed.). New Delhi, India: Vikas Publishing House.

Gujarati, D. N., & Sangeetha. (2007). Basic econometrics (Vol. 110, pp. 451-452). New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company Limited.

Haleblian, J., Devers, C. E., McNamara, G., Carpenter, M. A., & Davison, R. B. (2009). Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(3), 469-502. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330554.

Healy, L. M. (2006). Logistic regression: An overview. Eastern Michigan University, College of Technology. In Proceeding of COT, 7(11), 30-37.

Healy., P. M., Palepu, K. G., & Ruback, R. S. (1992). Does corporate performance improve after mergers? Journal of Financial Economics, 31(2), 135-175. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(92)90002-f.

Hogarty, T. (1970). The profitability of corporate mergers. The Journal of Business, 43(3), 317-327.

Hughes, A. (1991). Mergers and economic performance in the UK: A survey of the empirical evidence, 1950-1990. University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Economics.

Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.

Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.

Kaplan, S. N., & Weisbach, M. S. (1992). The success of acquisitions: Evidence from divestitures. The Journal of Finance, 47(1), 107–138. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb03980.x.

Kruse, T. A., Park, H. Y., Park, K., & Suzuki, K. I. (2002). The value of corporate diversification: Evidence from post-merger performance in Japan. Paper presented at the AFA 2003 Meetings, Washington, DC.

Kumar, S., & Bansal, L. K. (2008). The impact of mergers and acquisitions on corporate performance in India. Management Decision, 46(10), 1531-1543.

Limmack, R. J. (1991). Corporate mergers and shareholder wealth effects: 1977-1986. Accounting and Business Research, 21(83), 239–252. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1991.9729838.

Linn, S. C., & Switzer, J. A. (2001). Are cash acquisitions associated with better postcombination operating performance than stock acquisitions? Journal of Banking and Finance, 25(6), 1113–1138. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(00)00108-4.

Mahesh, R., & Prasad, D. (2012). Post-merger and acquisition financial performance analysis: A case study of select Indian airline companies. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 3(3), 362-369.

Mantecon, T. (2009). Mitigating risks in cross-border acquisitions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(4), 640-651. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.12.001.

Marina, M., Sjoerd, O., & Luc, R. (2007). The long-term operating performance of European acquisitions, international mergers and acquisitions activity since 1990: Quantitative analysis and recent research, G. Gregoriou and L. Renneboog (Eds.) (pp. 1-40). Massachusetts: Elsevier.

Meeks, G. (1977). Disappointing marriage: A study of the gains from mergers. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Megginson, W. L., Morgan, A., & Nail, L. (2004). The determinants of positive long-term performance in strategic mergers: Corporate focus and cash. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28, 523–552. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00412-0.

Mitchell, M. L., & Stafford, E. (2000). Managerial decisions and long-term stock price performance. Journal of Business, 73(3), 287–329. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/209645.

Mueller, D. C. (1980). Profits in the long run. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mulherin, J. H., & Boone, A. L. (2000). Comparing acquisitions and divestitures. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6(2), 117-139.

Park, M. Y., & Hastie, T. (2008). Penalized logistic regression for detecting gene interactions. Biostatistics, 9(1), 30–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxm010.

Patel, R. (2014). Pre-merger and post-merger financial & stock return analysis: A study with reference to selected Indian banks. Asian Journal of Research in Banking and Finance, 4(12), 1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7323.2014.01448.5.

Pazarskis, M., Vogiatzogloy, M., Christodoulou, P., & Drogalas, G. (2006). Exploring the improvement of corporate performance after mergers–the case of Greece. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 6(22), 184-192.

Perianu, A.-V., & Copãceanu, C. (2019). The effect of acquired company EBITDA on the deal value within M&A context: A study on the Pharmaceutical sector. JÖNKÖPING University, International Business School.

Peterson, D., & Peterson, P. (1991). The medium of exchange in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 15(2), 383-405.

Ramaswamy, K. P., & Waegelein, J. F. (2003). Firm !nancial performance following mergers. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 20(2), 115-126.

Rani, N., & Asija, A. (2017). Has financial crisis affected the announcement gains of Indian cross-border acquisitions? IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 6(1), 55–66. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975216676126.

Rani, N., Yadav, S. S., & Jain, P. K. (2015). Financial performance analysis of mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from India. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 25(4), 402–423. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCoMA-11-2012-0075.

Rau, P. R., & Vermaelen, T. (1998). Glamour, value and the post-acquisition performance of acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(2), 223-253. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(98)00023-3.

Saini, A., & Singla, R. (2015). Impact of mergers on corporate performance in India. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 5(3), 350-360. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7307.2015.00082.1.

Scherer, F. M. (1988). The market for corporate control: The empirical evidence since 1980. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 69-82.

Sinha, D. N., Kaushik, D. K., & Chaudhary, T. (2010). Measuring post merger and acquisition performance: An investigation of select financial sector organizations in India. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(4), 190–200. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v2n4p190.

Smith, R. L., & Kim, J.-H. (1994). The combined effects of free cash flow and financial slack on bidder and target stock returns. The Journal of Business, 67(2), 281. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/296633.

Sudarsanam, P. S., Holl, P., & Salami, A. (1996). Shareholder wealth gains in mergers: Effect of synergy and ownership structure. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23(5-6), 673–698.

The Institute for Mergers Acquisitions and Alliances (IMAA). (2019). Rrtrieved from: https://imaa-institute.org. link: https://imaa-institute.org/m-and-a-us-united-states/.

UCLA. (2009). Academic technology services-statistical consulting group (UCLA) 2009: Annotated STATA output: Logistic regression analysis. Retrieved from: https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/dae/logistic-regression/.

Yeh, T., & Hoshino, Y. (2002). Productivity and operating performance of Japanese merging firms: Keiretsu-related and independent mergers. Japan and the World Economy, 14(3), 347–366. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0922-1425(01)00081-0.

No any video found for this article.
Anjala Kalsie , Neha Singh (2021). Analysis of Synergies in Indian Corporate M&A Deals: A Logit Regression Approach. The Economics and Finance Letters, 8(2): 130-141. DOI: 10.18488/journal.29.2021.82.130.141
A firm's financial attributes play an essential part in the merger decision. The present paper attempts to improve the existing literature on assessing M&A activity in Indian corporate. The primary objective is to analyse 1) When synergies are gained, payment is made in cash, 2) When synergies are gained, M&A activity takes place in the related industries. The paper has analysed 20 major M&A deals which took place between 2010 and 2015 for the Indian Corporates. The data includes three year pre-merger , year of merger and three year post merger i.e. a total of seven year data for each deal has been used in the study effectively from 2007 to 2018. Random Effect Logit Regression has been applied to estimate the relationship. The major results derived from the analysis suggest that EBITDA has statistically significant relation with payment dummy as well as Industry relatedness. Statistically significant results have also been observed for Free Cash flow. Asset Turnover has also shown to have a significant relationship with relatedness of industry in our model. The results supports both the hypothesis of the study i.e. “When synergies are gained, cash mode of payment is preferred.” and “When synergies are gained, mergers & acquisition in related industry sector are preferred”.
Contribution/ Originality
This study is one of the very few studies which have investigated how the mode of payment in Merger and Acquisition(M&A) strategy is impacted by the synergies gained in the major M&A deals for Indian Corporates over the period from 2010 to 2015.

The Impact of Fundamental Factors on the Share Price of Micro-Sized Nasdaq Listed Technology Companies

Pages: 142-153
Find References

Finding References


The Impact of Fundamental Factors on the Share Price of Micro-Sized Nasdaq Listed Technology Companies

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search
Cite

DOI: 10.18488/journal.29.2021.82.142.153

Simon Rafaqat , Sahil Rafaqat , Saoul Rafaqat , Dawood Rafaqat

Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS

Abdulmannan, A. A., & Faturohman, T. (2015). The relationship between fundamental factors and stock return: A case based approach on banking companies listed in Indonesia stock exchange. Journal of Business and Management, 4(5), 579-586.

Adebisi, O. S., & Lawal, K. O. (2015). Equity share price determinants: a survey of literature. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (OMAN Chapter), 5(3), 38-44. Available at: 10.12816/0019112.

Al-Malkawi, H. A. N., AlShiab, M. S., & Pillai, R. (2018). The impact of company fundamentals on common stock prices: Evidence from MENA region. The Business & Management Review, 9(4), 162-172.

Al Qaisi, F., Tahtamouni, A., & Al-Qudah, M. (2016). Factors affecting the market stock price-The case of the insurance companies listed in Amman Stock Exchange. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 7(10), 81-90.

Alam, S., Miah, M. R., & Karim, M. A. (2016). Analysis on factors that affect stock prices: A study on listed cement companies at Dhaka stock exchange. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(18), 93-113.

Andikasari, R., & Sugiyono, S. (2018). Effect of return on equity, price earning ratio, earning per share, and firm size on stock prices. Journal of Management Science and Research (JIRM), 7(2), 2-17.

Araújo, R. C. D. C., & Machado, M. A. V. (2018). Book-to-market ratio, return on equity, and Brazilian stock returns. RAUSP Management Journal, 53(3), 324-344. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-04-2018-001.

Asmirantho, E., & Somantri, O. K. (2017). The effect of financial performance on stock price at pharmaceutical sub-sector company listed in Indonesia stock exchange. Scientific Journal of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, 3(2), 94-107. Available at: 10.34204/jiafe.v3i2.778.

Astuty, P. (2017). The influence of fundamental factors and systematic risk to stock prices on companies listed in the Indonesian stock exchange. European Research Studies, 20(4A), 230-240.

Bintara, R., & Tanjung, P. R. S. (2019). Analysis of fundamental factors on stock return. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 9(2), 49-64. Available at: 10.6007/IJARAFMS/v9-i2/6029.

Chasmi, N., & Fadaee, M. (2016). Impact of financial performance and growth opportunities on success or failure of companies: Evidence from Tehran stock exchange. Journal of Accounting and Marketing, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mazandaran, Iran, 5(2), 2-5.

Dang, N. H., & Tran, M. D. (2018). Investigation of the impact of financial information relevance on stock prices: The case of Vietnam. Management and Accounting, 22(2), 423-437.

Er, S., & Vuran, B. (2012). Factors affecting stock returns of firms quoted in ISE market: A Dynamic panel data approach. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 2(1), 109-122. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v2i1.209.

Gautam, R. (2017). Impact of firm specific variables on stock price volatility and stock returns of Nepalese commercial banks. International Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management, 4(6), 33-44. Available at: 10.5958/2319-1422.2017.00027.3.

Gursida, H. (2017). The influence of fundamental and macroeconomic analysis on stock price. Journal of Applied Management and Business, 3(2), 222-234. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jtmb.v3i2.324 .

Haque, S., & Faruquee, M. (2013). Impact of fundamental factors on stock price: A case based approach on pharmaceutical companies listed with Dhaka stock exchange. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(9), 34-41.

Imansyah, S., & Mustafa, M. H. (2021). The analysis of financial ratios effect on the stock price of consumer goods sector companies listed in KOMPAS 100 index. Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management, 2(2), 371-384. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31933/dijdbm.v2i2.779.

Islam, S., Arafin, M., & Zohora, F. T. (2017). Factors affecting share price of cement industry: A study on listed cement companies of DSE. European Journal of Management and Business Economics Account, 5(6), 48-66.

Julianto, A. R., & Syafarudin, A. (2019). Stock return analysis and implications in company value (plastic and packaging companies listed in IDX). International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 6(7), 101-118. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v6.i7.2019.420.

Khan, B., Tahir, M., Nasir, A. M., & Mushtaq, M. (2019). The impact of companies' internal factors on stock liquidity in Pakistan. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(4), 459-473.

Macharia, P. I., & Gatuhi, S. K. (2013). Effect of financial performance indicators on market price of shares in commercial banks of Kenya. International Journal of Management and Business Studies, 3(3), 57-60.

Medyawati, H., & Yunanto, M. (2020). Determinant of stock price manufacturing company: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(2), 524-535. Available at: 10.31014/aior.1992.03.02.217.

Milošević-Avdalović, S. (2018). The impact of firm specific factors on the stock prices: Empirical evidence from Belgrade stock exchange. Industry, 46(2), 7-20. Available at: 10.5937/industrija46-15271.

Nautiyal, N., & Kavidayal, P. C. (2018). Analysis of institutional factors affecting share prices: The case of National stock exchange. Global Business Review, 19(3), 707-721. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917713865.

Nazir, M. S., Nawaz, M. M., Anwar, W., & Ahmed, F. (2010). Determinants of stock price volatility in Karachi stock exchange: The mediating role of corporate dividend policy. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 55(55), 100-107.

Ozlen, S. (2014). The effect of company fundamentals on stock values. European Researcher, 3(2), 595-602.

Perdana, M. K., & Adriana, C. H. (2018). Factors influencing the stock price of banking companies in the Indonesia stock exchange. Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 1(1), 57-68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v1i01.26.

Ramadianto, F., & Fuadati, S. R. (2019). Effect of return on equity, return on assets, and earning per share on share prices. Journal of Management Science and Research (JIRM), 8(11), 1-15.

Robbetze, N., De Villiers, R., & Harmse, L. (2017). The effect of earnings per share categories on share price behavior: Some South African evidence. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 33(1), 141-152. Available at: https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v33i1.9886.

Sakia, B., & Sugiyono, S. (2019). The effect of dividend policies, company value, and profitability towards LQ45 company share prices. Journal of Management Science and Research (JIRM), 8(4), 1-17.

Saleh, M. (2015). Relationship between firm’s financial performance and stock returns: Evidence from oil and gas sector Pakistan. Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy, 5(10), 27–32.

Sharif, T., Purohit, H., & Pillai, R. (2015). Analysis of factors affecting share prices: The case of Bahrain stock exchange. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(3), 207-216. Available at: 10.5539/ijef.v7n3p207.

Subing, H. J. T., & Kusumah, R. W. R. (2017). An empirical analysis of internal and external factors of stock pricing: Evidence from Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(4), 178-187. Available at: 10.21511/ppm.15(4-1).2017.02

Sundaram, S., & Rajesh, M. (2016). Impact of fundamental factors on share price movements. International Journal of Scientific Research, 5(5), 290-296. Available at: 10.36106/isjr.

Tamunu, S. C., & Rumokoy, F. (2016). The influence of fundamental factors on stock return (Case study: Company Listed in LQ45 2011-2014). EMBA Journal: Journal of Economic Research, Management, Business and Accounting, 3(4), 628-636. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v3i4.11131.

Tawakkal, M., & Sugiyono, S. (2018). Effect of net profit margin, return on investment, earning per share on share return. Journal of Management Science and Research (JIRM), 7(10), 1-15.

Uddin, M. R., Rahman, Z., & Hossain, R. (2013). Determinants of stock prices in financial sector companies in Bangladesh. A study on Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE). Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(3), 471-480.

Vijayakumar, A. (2010). Effect of financial performance on share prices in the Indian corporate sector: An empirical study. Management and Labour Studies, 35(3), 369-381. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X1003500304.

Williams, J. R. (2008). Financial & managerial accounting: The basis for business decisions: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Zulkarnaen, A. H., Syamsun, M., & Maulana, T. N. A. (2016). Analysis of fundamental and technical factors to stock price on residential property sector companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6(12), 315-319.

No any video found for this article.
Simon Rafaqat , Sahil Rafaqat , Saoul Rafaqat , Dawood Rafaqat (2021). The Impact of Fundamental Factors on the Share Price of Micro-Sized Nasdaq Listed Technology Companies. The Economics and Finance Letters, 8(2): 142-153. DOI: 10.18488/journal.29.2021.82.142.153
The paper aims to examine the impact of fundamental factors on the share price of the companies in the sector of technology. Therefore, the study has selected eighteen micro-size technology companies listed in NASDAQ with a market capitalization between $50 million and $300 million. The data have been obtained from these companies’ annual reports, NASDAQ, and SEC ranging from 2015 to 2019. The study evaluates the influence of firm size, earning per share, debt equity ratio, current ratio, operating cash flow ratio, return on equity, assets turnover ratio, return on assets, and the net profit margin on the share price of the selected companies. Moreover, the study uses multiple regression analysis, ANOVA, Pearson correlation, normality, multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity, autocorrelation test to find the effect of predictor variables on the share price. The results show that the operating cash flow ratio has a positive insignificant effect while debt equity ratio, net profit margin, and return on equity have a negative insignificant impact on the share price. However, return on assets, earning per share, and firm size have a positive significant relationship with share price, whereas the current ratio and the asset turnover ratio have a negative significant relationship with the share price. In conclusion, although the variables have a more negative insignificant effect than the positive insignificant impact on the share price, the variables have a more positive significant effect than a negative significant influence. Overall, the fundamental factors collectively have a significant impact on the share price of the experimented companies.
Contribution/ Originality
This study is one of the very few studies which have investigated the effect of the fundamental factors on the share price of the eighteen micro-size technology companies listed in NASDAQ over the period from 2015 to 2019.

On the OCC Announcement Allowing US Banks to Use Stablecoins and the Immediate Impact on Cryptocurrency Valuations

Pages: 154-158
Find References

Finding References


On the OCC Announcement Allowing US Banks to Use Stablecoins and the Immediate Impact on Cryptocurrency Valuations

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search
Cite

DOI: 10.18488/journal.29.2021.82.154.158

Mark Schaub

Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS

CoinMarketCap. (2021). Retrieved from https://coinmarketcap.com/. [Accessed January 27, 2021].

Fry, J., & Cheah, E.-T. (2016). Negative bubbles and shocks in cryptocurrency markets. Interna-tional Review of Financial Analysis, 47, 343-352. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2016.02.008.

Keshari, J. S., Tiwari, A. K., Doğan, B., & Hammoudeh, S. (2020). Are the top six cryptocurrencies efficient? Evidence from time-varying long memory. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 1-11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2347.

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.

OCC. (2021a). Federally chartered banks and thrifts may participate in independent node verification networks and use stablecoins for payment activities. OCC News Release 2021-2. Retrieved from: https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2021/nr-occ-2021-2.html .

OCC. (2021b). OCC Chief counsel’s interpretation on national bank and federal savings associa-tion authority to use independent node verification networks and stablecoins for payment activi-ties. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Interpretive Letter 1174, January 2021. Retrievced from: https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2021/nr-occ-2021-2a.pdf .

Schaub, M. (2017). A note on the early effects of the US presidential vote on mexican ADR val-ues. Journal of Asset Management, 18(7), 511–515. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-017-0043-x.

Schaub, M., & Phares, H. B. (2020). Cryptocurrency value changes in response to national elec-tions: Do they behave like money or commodities? Applied Economics Letters, 27(14), 1135-1140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2019.1673297.

Shanaev, S., Sharma, S., Ghimire, B., & Shuraeva, A. (2020a). Taming the blockchain beast? Regulatory implications for the cryptocurrency market. Research in International Business and Finance, 51(C), 101080. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101080.

Shanaev, S., Shuraeva, A., Vasenin, M., & Kuznetsov, M. (2020b). Cryptocurrency value and 51% attacks: Evidence from event studies. Journal of Alternative Investments, 22(3), 65-77. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2019.1.081.

No any video found for this article.
Mark Schaub (2021). On the OCC Announcement Allowing US Banks to Use Stablecoins and the Immediate Impact on Cryptocurrency Valuations. The Economics and Finance Letters, 8(2): 154-158. DOI: 10.18488/journal.29.2021.82.154.158
On January 4, 2021 the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), a major regulator of financial institutions in the United States, announced that federally chartered banks and thrifts were now allowed to utilize stablecoins as payment instruments. Much research and many discussions have revolved around policies of governments worldwide in how to handle the new cryptocurrency phenomenon. The purpose of this short study was to observe the valuation impact of that announcement on the three largest cryptocurrencies and two others. Research findings show the altcoins with valuations not tied to the dollar had substantial increases in value while the stablecoins, which the announcement specified are now allowed to be used by banks, changed very little. Specifically, Bitcoin and Etherium increased over 20% in value within 5 days of the announcement while the stablecoins Tether and USDCoin changed in value by no more than 0.10% for the same event window. This shows that stablecoins lived up to their name even though they were promoted as an acceptable payment system in the US.
Contribution/ Originality
This study contributes to the existing cryptocurrency and event-study literature by examining the impact of an announcement by a major banking regulator in the United States upon the valuation of popular cryptocurrencies. Despite being plugged as acceptable payment methods in the US, stablecoins had no significant changes in value.

World Governance Indicators and Fraud: Evidence from One Belt One Road Countries

Pages: 159-179
Find References

Finding References


World Governance Indicators and Fraud: Evidence from One Belt One Road Countries

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search
Cite

DOI: 10.18488/journal.29.2021.82.159.179

ANTWI, Stephen Kwadwo , KONG, Yusheng , MUSAH, Mohammed , DONKOR, Mary

Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS


No any video found for this article.
ANTWI, Stephen Kwadwo , KONG, Yusheng , MUSAH, Mohammed , DONKOR, Mary (2021). World Governance Indicators and Fraud: Evidence from One Belt One Road Countries. The Economics and Finance Letters, 8(2): 159-179. DOI: 10.18488/journal.29.2021.82.159.179
This paper investigates the effect of worldwide governance indicators and global competitiveness on the level of accounting fraud in One Belt One Road (OBOR) countries. We use publicly available data from various sources. We perform principal components analysis to reduce the six governance indicators to three governance indexes. Governance indicators have significant impact on fraud and the effect could be positive or negative depending on the dimensions involved. Voice and accountability and political stability show significant negative impact on the number of fraud cases. Competitiveness shows a positive but insignificant effect on the level of fraud cases. Democratic countries report lesser number of fraud cases. The findings should be read with caution because of the diversity in the countries in the sample. OBOR countries exhibit different governance models, which may affect their indicators and as a result, the extent of fraud cases reported may be influenced by the regime practiced by a country. The study considers the relevance of governance indicators to policymakers in dealing with rising level of fraud since fraudulent activities affect productivity. Fraud analysis should be embedded in the governance architecture of countries to stimulate development and mitigate the risks of bankruptcies, business failures and loss of investments.
Contribution/ Originality
The paper contributes to literature on fraud and forensic accounting theories by employing the institutional framework to highlight the occurrence of fraud in different settings.