In the current framework of behavioral corporate finance, this article studies the relationship between the managers’ overconfidence and firm performance through the financing structure in the Tunisian context. Our model seeks to identify if the financing structure as a mediating variable between the performance and overconfidence. The empirical study is based on a sample of 56 firm managers for the year 2014. The results of the conducted regressions confirm the existence of a mediating effect of the financing structure on the relationship between overconfidence and the performance of Tunisian firms.
This study is one of the few studies which have investigated the indirect impact of overconfidence on the performance of Tunisian firms through their financing structure; it is based on a new methodology that uses the theory of Baron and Kenny (1986) by utilising mediating variables to assess the relationship between the firm’s overconfidence and performance.
Baker, M., R. Ruback and J. Wurgler, 2004. Behavioral corporate finance: A survey. NBER Working Paper, No. W10863.
Baron, R.M. and D.A. Kenny, 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182.
Ben-David, I., J. Graham and C. Harvey, 2006. Managerial overconfidence and corporate policies. AFA 2007, Chicago Meetings Paper, NBER Working Paper, N°. 13711.
Bernardo, A. and I. Welch, 2001. On the evolution of overconfidence and entrepreneurs. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10(3): 301-330.
Bukszar, E., 2003. Does overconfidence lead to poor decisions? A comparison of decision making and judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Business and Management, 9(1): 33-43.
Charreaux, G., 1999. La théorie positive de l’agence: Lecture et relectures, In G. Koenig (Coordonné). De nouvelles théories pour gérer l’entreprise du XIXè siècle. Working Papers CREGO from Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations. Economica: 61-141.
Daniel, K., D. Hirshleifer and S. Teoh, 2001. Investor psychology in capital markets: Evidence and policy implications. Dice Center Working Paper No. 2001-10.
Daniel, K. and S. Titman, 1999. Market efficiency in an irrational world. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(6): 28-40.
De Bondt, W. and R. Thaler, 1995. Financial decision making in markets and firms: A behavioral perspective, in handbook in operations research and management science, Eds., by Jarrow V., Maksimovic R., Ziemba W., Finance. Amsterdam: (Elsevier), 9: 385–410.
DeBondt, W. and R. Thaler, 1994. Financial decision-making in markets and firms: A behavioral perspective. NBER Working Paper, No. W4777.
Fairchild, R., 2005. The effect of managerial overconfidence, asymmetric information, and moral hazard on capital structure decisions. Available from SSRN 711845.
Gervais, S., J. Heaton and T. Odean, 2003. Overconfidence, investment policy, and executive stock options, Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Paper No. 15-02.
Hackbarth, D., 2004. Managerial traits and capital structure decisions. EFA 2004 Maastricht Meetings Paper.
Hermalin, B.E. and A.M. Isen, 2000. The effect of affect on economic and strategic decision making. USC Center for Law, Economics & Organization Research Paper No C01-5, Juillet.
Igalens and Roussel, 1998. Human resources management research methods. Paris: Economica, Collection Management Research.
Jensen, M.C. and W. Meckling, 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
Keiber, K., 2006. Managerial compensation contracts and overconfidence. EFMA Behavioral Finance Symposium Paper.
Malmendier and Tate, 2005b. Does overconfidence affect corporate investment? CEO overconfidence measures revisited. European Financial Management, 11(5): 649-659.
Malmendier, Tate and Yan, 2005. Corporate financial policies with overconfident managers. 8th Annual Texas Finance Festival.
Manel, D., 2015. Bias behavioral, financing structure and performance of Tunisian companies. Master Thesis, FSEG, University of Sfax,Tunisia.
Martinet, 1990. Epistemologies and management science, Éd. Paris: Économica.
Modigliani and Miller, 1958. The cost of capital, coporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 53(3): 261-275.
Nekhili, M., B. Sabri and l. Faten, 2012. Ownership structure, voluntary R & D disclosure and market value of firms: The French case. International Journal of Business, 17(2): 126-140.
Roll, R., 1986. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 59(2): 197-216.
Russo, J.E. and P. Schoemaker, 1992. Managing overconfidence. Sloan Management Review, 33(2): 7-17.
Shiller, R.J., 1997. Human behavior and the efficiency of the financial system, John B. Taylor and Michael Woodford (Eds). Handbook of Macroeconomics.
Strahan, P.E., 1999. Borrower risk and the price and nonprice terms of bank loans. Federal Reserve Bank of New York in Its Series Staff Reports No. 90.
Véronique, B., 2007. Overconfidence financial leaders and decisions: A synthesis. Finance Control Strategy, 10(1): 39 – 66.
Wacheux, F., 1996. Qualitative methods and research management. Paris: Economica. pp: 290.
Weinstein, N., 1980. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5): 806-820.
Zouari, G. and R. Zouari-Hadiji, 2010. Internal governance systems and R&D investment: An international comparison. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 6(1): 39-56.
Zouari, G. and R. Zouari-Hadiji, 2013. Ownership structure, innovation and firm performance: Evidence from Tunisia. International Journal of Governance, 3(2): 79-107.
Zouari, G. and R. Zouari-Hadiji, 2014a. Directors board, R&D investment and the firm’s performance: Evidence from the French case. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 10(2): 85-101.
Zouari, G. and R. Zouari-Hadiji, 2014b. The indirect impact of the board of directors composition on the firm's performance: An international comparison. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 4(10): 468-487.
This study received no specific financial support.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All authors contributed equally to the conception and design of the study.