Turkey is an important country in terms of forestry and biodiversity. In the world, it is one of the places with the highest plant diversity after the equatorial region. There are nearly 4000 endemic plant species. Local conditions have a significant share in the formation of this property. Turkey holds a good position as a wood producer in the production of forest products, which are among forest assets. However, despite its high potential for production of non-wood forest products, which are also among forest assets, it cannot take due advantage of this potential in resource management. Production and marketing problems are the main factors underlying its failure to use this potential. This study aims to draw attention to the production and marketing of pine nuts, which are non-wood forest products, and to put forward suggestions for the use of the above-mentioned potential. Systematic approach was used as a research method. In some cases, regional approaches were also utilized. The data of the Turkish Statistical Institute was used as research material. ArcGIS 10.3 package was utilized in the preparation of cartographic materials. The seed obtained from the cones of Pinus pinea (Stone pine) is a product which is traded both in Turkey’s domestic market and exported abroad. The seeds, which are commercially important, are important sources of income for rural areas. Turkey is suitable for the ecological conditions of Pinus pinea, which is among the industrial wood and non-wood forest products. For this reason, Pinus pinea fields should be made widespread in order to retain population in rural areas and increase their income.
This research explores the different characteristics of Stone Pine, one of the non-wood forest products, in Turkey and rest of world. This makes the present study more exclusive among other research works.
Stone pine, Pine nuts, Production, Geography, Turkey.
F. Fırat, "İn our stone pine forest fruit and wood yield in terms of research and forest management Principles' Ziraat Vekaleti," Yüksek Ziraat Enstitüsü Çalışmaları, vol. 141, 1943.
K. Yazıcı and E. Gavcar, "A study on export of stone pine in Turkey İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Seri B Cilt 38 Sayı 3 İstanbul," 1988.
H. Çukur, "The contribution of stone pine communities of Ege region in economy and ecology of stone pine Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi," vol. 8, pp. 65-84, 1995.
N. Günal, Distribution of some tree species and their ecological and florist characteristics in Turkey. İstanbul: Çantay Kitabevi, 22, 1997.
M. Kılcı, M. Sayman, and G. Akbin, "Factors affecting the growth of the stone pine (Pinus pinea L) in Western Anatolia, Orman Bakanlığı, İzmir Orman Toprak Laboratuar Müdürlüğü, Bakanlık Yayın No. 115, Orman Toprak Labaratuvar Müdürlüğü Yayını No. 09 Sayfa 130. İzmir," 2000.
M. Sülüşoğlu, "The management of villagers Owned stone Pine (Pinus Pinea L.) Plantations in Kozak Region, Turkey: A case study. FAO Working Paper No. 48," 2004.
Arası, H. Kalaycıoğlu, and H. Yel, "Some characteristics of flake plates produced from cones of stone pine III (Pinus Pinea L.)," presented at the Uluslararası Odun Dışı Orman Ürünleri Sempozyumu Kahramanmaraş, 2014.
İ. Atalay and R. Efe, "Biogeography of Turkey," Meta Basım. İzmir, 2015.
A. D. Arseven, Field research methodology (Examples from Principles Techniques). Ankara: Gündüz Eğitim Yayıncılık, 2001.
S. Mutke, R. Calama, S. González-Martinez, G. Montero, J. Gordo, D. Bono, and L. Gil, "4 mediterranean stone pine: Botany and horticulture," Horticultural Reviews, vol. 39, p. 153-201, 2012. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
B. Fady, S. Fineschi, and G. G. Vendramin, Technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use for Italian stone pine (Pinus Pinea L.). Rome, Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, 2004.
V. R. Abad, G. Caudullo, S. Oliveira, and D. De Rigo, Pinus Pinaster in Europe: Distribution, habitat, usage and threats. Luxembourg: European Atlas of Forest Tree Species, Publication Office of the European Union, 2016.
This study received no specific financial support.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All authors contributed equally to the conception and design of the study.