Financial Risk and Management Reviews

Published by: Conscientia Beam
Online ISSN: 2411-6408
Print ISSN: 2412-3404
Quick Submission    Login/Submit/Track

No. 1

The Indirect Impact of Overconfidence on the Performance of Tunisian Firms Through their Financing Structure

Pages: 26-42
Find References

Finding References


The Indirect Impact of Overconfidence on the Performance of Tunisian Firms Through their Financing Structure

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search
Cite

DOI: 10.18488/journal.89/2016.2.1/89.1.26.42

Manel Dahmani , Ghazi Zouari

Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS

  1. Baker, M., R. Ruback and J. Wurgler, 2004. Behavioral corporate finance: A survey. NBER Working Paper, No. W10863.
  2. Baron, R.M. and D.A. Kenny, 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182.
  3. Ben-David, I., J. Graham and C. Harvey, 2006. Managerial overconfidence and corporate policies. AFA 2007, Chicago Meetings Paper, NBER Working Paper, N°. 13711.
  4. Bernardo, A. and I. Welch, 2001. On the evolution of overconfidence and entrepreneurs. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10(3): 301-330.
  5. Bukszar, E., 2003. Does overconfidence lead to poor decisions? A comparison of decision making and judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Business and Management, 9(1): 33-43.
  6. Charreaux, G., 1999. La théorie positive de l’agence: Lecture et relectures, In G. Koenig (Coordonné). De nouvelles théories pour gérer l’entreprise du XIXè siècle. Working Papers CREGO from Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations. Economica: 61-141.
  7. Daniel, K., D. Hirshleifer and S. Teoh, 2001. Investor psychology in capital markets: Evidence and policy implications. Dice Center Working Paper No. 2001-10.
  8. Daniel, K. and S. Titman, 1999. Market efficiency in an irrational world. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(6): 28-40.
  9. De Bondt, W. and R. Thaler, 1995. Financial decision making in markets and firms: A behavioral perspective, in handbook in operations research and management science, Eds., by Jarrow V., Maksimovic R., Ziemba W., Finance. Amsterdam: (Elsevier), 9: 385–410.
  10. DeBondt, W. and R. Thaler, 1994. Financial decision-making in markets and firms: A behavioral perspective. NBER Working Paper, No. W4777.
  11. Fairchild, R., 2005. The effect of managerial overconfidence, asymmetric information, and moral hazard on capital structure decisions. Available from SSRN 711845.
  12. Gervais, S., J. Heaton and T. Odean, 2003. Overconfidence, investment policy, and executive stock options, Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Paper No. 15-02.
  13. Hackbarth, D., 2004. Managerial traits and capital structure decisions. EFA 2004 Maastricht Meetings Paper.
  14. Heaton, J., 2002. Managerial optimism and corporate finance. Financial Management, 31(2): 33-45.
  15. Hermalin, B.E. and A.M. Isen, 2000. The effect of affect on economic and strategic decision making. USC Center for Law, Economics & Organization Research Paper No C01-5, Juillet.
  16. Igalens and Roussel, 1998. Human resources management research methods. Paris: Economica, Collection Management Research.
  17. Jensen, M.C. and W. Meckling, 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
  18. Keiber, K., 2006. Managerial compensation contracts and overconfidence. EFMA Behavioral Finance Symposium Paper.
  19. Malmendier and Tate, 2005b. Does overconfidence affect corporate investment? CEO overconfidence measures revisited. European Financial Management, 11(5): 649-659.
  20. Malmendier, Tate and Yan, 2005. Corporate financial policies with overconfident managers. 8th Annual Texas Finance Festival.
  21. Manel, D., 2015. Bias behavioral, financing structure and performance of Tunisian companies. Master Thesis, FSEG, University of Sfax,Tunisia.
  22. Martinet, 1990. Epistemologies and management science, Éd. Paris: Économica.
  23. Modigliani and Miller, 1958. The cost of capital, coporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 53(3): 261-275.
  24. Nekhili, M., B. Sabri and l. Faten, 2012. Ownership structure, voluntary R & D disclosure and market value of firms: The French case. International Journal of Business, 17(2): 126-140.
  25. Roll, R., 1986. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 59(2): 197-216.
  26. Russo, J.E. and P. Schoemaker, 1992. Managing overconfidence. Sloan Management Review, 33(2): 7-17.
  27. Shiller, R.J., 1997. Human behavior and the efficiency of the financial system, John B. Taylor and Michael Woodford (Eds). Handbook of Macroeconomics.
  28. Strahan, P.E., 1999. Borrower risk and the price and nonprice terms of bank loans. Federal Reserve Bank of New York in Its Series Staff Reports No. 90.
  29. Véronique, B., 2007. Overconfidence financial leaders and decisions: A synthesis. Finance Control Strategy, 10(1): 39 – 66.
  30. Wacheux, F., 1996. Qualitative methods and research management. Paris: Economica. pp: 290.
  31. Weinstein, N., 1980. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5): 806-820.
  32. Zouari, G. and R. Zouari-Hadiji, 2010. Internal governance systems and R&D investment: An international comparison. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 6(1): 39-56.
  33. Zouari, G. and R. Zouari-Hadiji, 2013. Ownership structure, innovation and firm performance: Evidence from Tunisia. International Journal of Governance, 3(2): 79-107.
  34. Zouari, G. and R. Zouari-Hadiji, 2014a. Directors board, R&D investment and the firm’s performance: Evidence from the French case. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 10(2): 85-101.
  35. Zouari, G. and R. Zouari-Hadiji, 2014b. The indirect impact of the board of directors composition on the firm's performance: An international comparison. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 4(10): 468-487.
Manel Dahmani , Ghazi Zouari (2016). The Indirect Impact of Overconfidence on the Performance of Tunisian Firms Through their Financing Structure. Financial Risk and Management Reviews, 2(1): 26-42. DOI: 10.18488/journal.89/2016.2.1/89.1.26.42
In the current framework of behavioral corporate finance, this article studies the relationship between the managers’ overconfidence and firm performance through the financing structure in the Tunisian context. Our model seeks to identify if the financing structure as a mediating variable between the performance and overconfidence. The empirical study is based on a sample of 56 firm managers for the year 2014. The results of the conducted regressions confirm the existence of a mediating effect of the financing structure on the relationship between overconfidence and the performance of Tunisian firms.

Contribution/ Originality
This study is one of the few studies which have investigated the indirect impact of overconfidence on the performance of Tunisian firms through their financing structure; it is based on a new methodology that uses the theory of Baron and Kenny (1986) by utilising mediating variables to assess the relationship between the firm’s overconfidence and performance.

Does Managerial Emotional Biases Affect Debt Maturity Preference? Bayesian Network Method: Evidence from Tunisia

Pages: 1-25
Find References

Finding References


Does Managerial Emotional Biases Affect Debt Maturity Preference? Bayesian Network Method: Evidence from Tunisia

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search
Cite

DOI: 10.18488/journal.89/2016.2.1/89.1.1.25

AZOUZI Mohamed Ali , JARBOUI Anis

Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS

  1. Adams, K.H., E. Hansen, L.H. Pinborg, S.G. Hasselbalch, C. Svarer, S. Holm, T.G. Bolvig and G.M. Knudsen, 2005. Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder have increased 5-HT2A receptor binding in the caudate nuclei. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 8(3): 391-401.
  2. Agrawal, A. and N. Jayaraman, 1994. The dividend policies of all- equity firms, a direct test of the free cash flow theory. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15(2): 139-148.
  3. Antoniou, A., Y. Guney and K. Paudyal, 2007. The determinants of capital structure: Capital market oriented versus bank oriented institutions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(1): 59-92.
  4. Azouzi, M.A. and A. Jarboui, 2012. CEO emotional bias and capital structure choice, bayesian network method. Business Excellence and Management, 2(2): 47-70.
  5. Baker, M., S.R. Richard and J. Wurgler, 2007. Behavioral corporate finance. Handbook of Corporate Finance, 1: 145-186.
  6. Baker, M., R.S. Ruback and J. Wurgler, 2004. Behavioral corporate finance: A survey. SSRN, à paraître (2005). In B. Eckbo (Eds). Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance.
  7. Barclay, M. and C.W. Smith, 1995. The maturity structure of corporate debt. Journal of Finance, 50(2): 609-631.
  8. Ben-David, I., J. Graham and C. Harvey, 2007. Managerial overconfidence and corporate policies, AFA 2007. Chicago Meetings Paper.
  9. Ben-David, S., J. Blitzer, K. Crammer, A. Kulesza, F. Pereira and J. Vaughan, 2010. A theory of learning from different domains. Machine Learning Journal, 79(1, 2): 151-175.
  10. Bernardo, A. and I. Welch, 2001. On the evolution of overconfidence and entrepreneurs. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(3): 301-330.
  11. Bertrand, M. and S. Mullainathan, 2003. Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 111(5): 1043-1075.
  12. Bertrand, M. and A. Schoar, 2003. Managing with style: The effect of managers on corporate policy, joint with Marianne Bertrand. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4): 1169-1208.
  13. Booth, L., V. Aivazian, A. Demirguc-Kunt and V. Maksimovic, 2001. Capital structure in developing countries. Journal of Finance, 56(1): 87-130.
  14. Bujadi, M.L. and A.J. Richardson, 1997. A citation trail review of the uses of firme size in accounting research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 16: 1-27.
  15. Bushman, R., J. Piotroski and A. Smith, 2004. What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2): 207–252.
  16. Cazavan-Jeny, A., 2004. Le ratio market-to-book et la reconnaissance des immatériels- une étude du marché français. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 10(2): 99-124.
  17. Chang, C., A.C. Lee and C.F. Lee, 2009. Determinants of capital structure choice: A structural equation modelling approach. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(2): 197-213.
  18. Chtourou, S., J. Bédard and L. Couteau, 2001. Corporate governance and earning management. Working Paper, Laval University.
  19. Chung, K. and S.A. Pruitt, 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management, 23(3): 70-74.
  20. Cliche, A., 2000. Les déterminants de la gestion des risques par les entreprises non financières: Une revue de la littérature. Cahier De Recherche: 1206-3290.
  21. Cockburn, I. and Z. Griliches, 1988. Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market. American Economic Review, 78(2): 419-424.
  22. Draief, S., 2010. Structure financière, gestion des résultats et caractéristiques de la firme. Comptabilité, Contrôle, Audit et Institutions, halshs-00578113.
  23. Dufour, D. and E. Molay, 2010. La structure financière des PME françaises: Une analyse sectorielle sur données de panel, manuscrit auteur, publié dans crises et nouvelles problématique de la valeur, Nice, hal-00479529.
  24. Fama, E.F. and K.R. French, 2002. Testing tradeoff and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Review of Financial Studies, 15(1): 1-33.
  25. Fama, E.F. and M.C. Jensen, 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2): 301-325.
  26. Forker, J.J., 1992. Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting and Business Research, 22(86): 111-124.
  27. Frank, M. and V. Goyal, 2007. Trade-off and pecking order theories of debt. Working Paper, Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth.
  28. Gervais, S., J.B. Heaton and T. Odean, 2002. The positive role of overconfidence and optimism in investment policy. Mimeo: University of California, Berkeley.
  29. Goel, A.M. and A.V. Thakor, 2008. Overconfidence, CEO selection, and corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 63(6): 2737–2784.
  30. Graham, J.R., 2000. How big are the tax benefits of debt. Journal of Finance, 55(5): 1901-1940.
  31. Graham, J.R., C.R. Harvey and M. Puri, 2013. Managerial attitudes and corporate actions. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1): 103-121.
  32. Griliches, Z., 1981. Market value, R&D and patents. Economic Letters, 7(2): 183-187.
  33. Gueney, Y. and K. Paudyal, 2003. The determinants of corporate debt maturity structure. EFA Annual Conference Paper Helsinki Meetings.
  34. Gul, F.A. and J.S.L. Tsui, 1998. A test of the free cash flow and debt monitoring hypotheses: Evidence from audit pricing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24: 219-237.
  35. Hackbarth, D., 2009. Determinants of corporate borrowing: A behavioral perspective. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(4): 389–411.
  36. Haniffa, R. and T. Cooke, 2000. Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Asian AAA World Conference, Singapore, 28-30 June.
  37. Harris, M. and A. Raviv, 1991. The theory of capital structure. Journal of Finance, 46(1): 297-355.
  38. Hawkins, S.A., S.J. Hoch and J. Meyers-Levy, 2001. Low-involvement learning: Repetition and coherence in familiarity and belief. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(1): 1-11.
  39. Heaton, J., 2002. Managerial optimism and corporate finance. Financial Management, 31(2): 33-45.
  40. Helliar, C., D. Power and C. Sinclair, 2005. Managerial irrationality in financial decision making. Managerial Finance, 31(4): 1-11.
  41. Hirshleifer, D., 1993. Managerial reputation and corporate investment decisions. Financial Management, 22(2): 145-160.
  42. Ho, C.R. and Y. Chang, 2009. Ceo overconfidence and corporate financial distress. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1659440 [Accessed August 15, 2009].
  43. Hovakimian, A., G. Hovakimian and H. Tehranian, 2004. Determinants of target capital structure: The case of dual debt and equity issues. Journal of Financial Economics, 71(3): 517-540.
  44. Huang, R. and J.R. Ritter, 2009. Testing theories of capital structure and estimating the speed of adjustment. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(02): 237-271.
  45. Jaggi, B. and F.A. Gul, 1999. An analysis of joint effects of investment opportunity set, free cash flows and size on corporate debt policy. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 12(4): 371-381.
  46. Jalilvand, A. and R.S. Harris, 1984. Corporate behaviour in adjusting to capital structure and dividend targets: An econometric study. Journal of Finance, 39(1): 127-145.
  47. Jensen, M.C., 1986. Agency costs of free cash-flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2): 323–339.
  48. Julien and Marchesnay, 1987. La petite entreprise. Paris: Vuibert.
  49. Kahneman, D., S. Knetsch and R.H. Thaler, 1991. The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1): 193-206.
  50. Kaplan, S.N., M.M. Klebanov and M. Sorensen, 2010. Which CEO characteristics and abilities matter? Journal of Finance, 62(6): 2725-2762.
  51. Landier, A. and D. Thesmar, 2009. Financial risk management: When does independence fail? American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 99(2): 454-458.
  52. Lang, L., R.M. Stulz and R.A. Walkling, 1991. A test of free cash-flow hypothesis the cash of bidder return. Journal of Financial Economics, 29(2): 315-335.
  53. Lehn, K. and A.B. Poulsen, 1989. Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions. Journal of Finance, 44(3): 771-787.
  54. Lin, Y.H., S.Y. Hu and M.S. Chen, 2007. Testing peking order prediction from the viewpoint of managerial optimism: Some empirical evidence from Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 16: 160-181.
  55. Lindenberg, E. and S. Ross, 1981. Tobin's q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business, 54(1): 1-32.
  56. Malmendier, U. and G. Tate, 2005. CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60(6): 2661-2700.
  57. Malmendier, U. and G. Tate, 2008. Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1): 20-43.
  58. Malmendier, U., G. Tate and J. Yan, 2010. Managerial beliefs and corporate financial policies. Working Paper n°105, UC Berkeley and UC Los Angeles, Faculty.fuqua.duke.edu.
  59. Megna, P. and L. Klock, 1993. The impact of intangible capital on Tobin’s Q in the semiconductor industry. American Economic Review, 83(2): 265-269.
  60. Menkhoff, L. and M. Nikiforow, 2009. Professionals endorsement of behavioral finance: Does it impact their perception of markets and themselves? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2): 318-329.
  61. Moussu, C. and C. Thibierge, 1997. Politique financière, opportunité d’investissement et actifs immatériels en Europe: Théorie et étude empirique. Banque et Marchés n°30, Septembre- Octobre, 6-2.
  62. Myers, S. and N. Majluf, 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information those investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2): 187-221.
  63. Myers, S.C., 1984. The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39(3): 574-592.
  64. Nosic, A. and M. Weber, 2008. How riskily do i invest? The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions, and overconfidence. Decision Analysis, 7(3): 282-301.
  65. Pearl, J., 1986. Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks. Journal of Artificiel Intelligence, 29(3): 241-288.
  66. Rajan, R.G. and L. Zingales, 1995. What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. Journal of Finance, 50(5): 1421-1460.
  67. Ross, S., 1977. The determination of financial structure: The incentive signaling approach. Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1): 23-40.
  68. Rozeff, M.S., 1982. Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratio. Journal of Financial Research, 5(3): 249-259.
  69. Scherr, F. and H.M. Hulbert, 2001. The debt maturity structure of small firms. Financial Management, 30(1): 85–111.
  70. Skinner, D., 1993. The investment opportunity set and accounting procedure choice: Preliminary evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(4): 407– 445.
  71. Stulz, R., 1990. Managerial discretion and optimal financing policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(1): 3-27.
  72. Stulz, R.M., 1996. Rethinking risk management. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9(3): 8-24.
  73. Thibierge, C., 2001. Actifs immatériels, valorisation boursière et contrainte d'endettement: Etude empirique sur les marchés français et espagnol. Congrès International de l'Association Française de Finance, Namur. pp: 28-30.
  74. Titman, S. and R. Wessels, 1998. The determinants of capital structure choice. Journal of Finance, 43(1): 1-19.
  75. Wright, D.W., 1996. Evidence on the relation between corporate governance characteristics and the quality of financial reporting. No. 9601. University of Michigan.
  76. Zhang, G., 1997. Ownership concentration, risk aversion and the effect of financial structure on investment decisions. European Economic Review, 42(9): 1751-1777.
AZOUZI Mohamed Ali , JARBOUI Anis (2016). Does Managerial Emotional Biases Affect Debt Maturity Preference? Bayesian Network Method: Evidence from Tunisia. Financial Risk and Management Reviews, 2(1): 1-25. DOI: 10.18488/journal.89/2016.2.1/89.1.1.25
This study documents that managerial characteristics’ play an important role in determining corporate debt maturity. Specifically, we focus on the relationship between the managerial biases and firm debt maturity preference. Empirical analysis of the relationship between emotional bias and debt maturity using Bayesian Network Method. We distributed a questionnaire among 100 Tunisian managers to measure their emotional biases. Our results have revealed that the behavioral analysis of debt maturity preference implies leader affected by behavioral biases (optimism, loss aversion, and overconfidence) presence prefer long term debt maturity allowing this protect against the takeover operation Russianness.

Contribution/ Originality
The paper pushing organizations managers to choose according to their emotional level (applied emotional capacity test up psychometric testing). In addition, it increases the validity of inferences from the research. This paper incites governments to establish training programs aimed at the development of learning of emotional capacity.