Quick Links


ADVERTISEMENT

International Journal of Education and Practice

Published by:
Conscientia Beam
Online ISSN: 2310-3868
Print ISSN: 2311-6897
Share Options
 
Download Journal Flyer
RSS Feeds
Quick Submission
Login/Submit/Track

 

Features

  • International Journal of Education and Practice (e-ISSN 2310-3868/p-ISSN 2311-6897) is a double-blind peer-reviewed international journal devoted to encouraging academic conversation between teachers and researchers in the field of higher education. The IJEP publish the highest quality of empirical, theoretically grounded work addressing the main functions of higher education, Teaching and learning of different subjects, Teaching in the developed & developing countries, Education, Mental Illness, and psychology.

    • First Review: The editor or editorial assistant decides whether the article fits within the journal’s aims and scope. Next a checked for the similarity rate is completed using CrossCheck, powered by iThenticate. Any manuscripts out of the journal’s scope or having plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, are rejected without peer reviewed.
    • Publication: Articles are peer-reviewed and a first decision provided to authors approximately 20 to 30 working days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 10 to 15 days.
    • DOIs at the Article Level: Each paper published in International Journal of Education and Practice is assigned a DOI number, Click HERE to know what is DOI (Digital Object Identifier).
    • Abstract Video: Abstract videos are available at YouTube channel .
    • High Visibility: International Journal of Education and Practice is indexed by the Scopus, ERIC, Google Scholar, PAS,  CNKI Scholar and other databases.
    • Article Processing Charges (APC):  There is no submission fee, the author(s) pay the article processing charges: 550 USD, after acceptance. If your institute is a member of the Conscientia Beam,  your APC could be discounted up to 10%.
    • Recognition of Reviewers: Reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in any Conscientia Beam journal, in appreciation of the work done.
    • Conscientia Beam takes the responsibility to enforce a rigorous peer-review together with strict ethical policies and standards to ensure to add high quality scientific works to the field of scholarly publication. Unfortunately, cases of plagiarism, data falsification, inappropriate authorship credit, and the like, do arise. Conscientia Beam takes such publishing ethics issues very seriously and our editors are trained to proceed in such cases with a zero tolerance policy. To verify the originality of content submitted to our journals, we use iThenticate to check submissions against previous publications. Conscientia Beam works with Publons to provide reviewers with credit for their work.

Recent Articles

VIEW MORE

Most Cited Articles

Using Jigsaw Technique as an Effective Way of Promoting Co-Operative Learning Among Primary Six Pupils in Fijai
Tablet Technologies and Education
Representation of Science Process Skills in the Chemistry Curricula for Grades 10, 11 and 12 / Turkey
Student-Teachers’ Attitudes toward Students with Disabilities: Associations with Contact and Empathy
A Critical Review of the School-Based Assessment in Brunei Darussalam
VIEW MORE

Journal Metrics

Sr. No. Country Authors
1 Nigeria 56
2 Malaysia 40
3 Indonesia 28
4 Kenya 23
5 USA 18
VIEW MORE

Article Videos

Customs Administration Students Usage of Metacognitive Knowledge in their Internships
Investigating Attitude towards Role Play and its Subjective Value in Predicting Arabic Language Proficiency among UiTM Students
The Power of Role-Playing in Counseling Children with Learning Difficulties in Inclusive Schools of Indonesia
VIEW MORE
Prof. Dr. Radhi Al-Mabuk
University of Northern Iowa
USA
Login
Dr. Francesca Cuzzocrea
University of Messina
Italy
Login

Article Processing Charge

The managing editor of the journal will demand article processing charges after acceptance. We will charge the very low Article Processing Charges to cover the some administrative cost like, formatting, English editing, and archiving, etc.  We will cover other expenses through the subscription of journals and membership.  The invoice of Article Processing Charges that will be issued to the submitting author after acceptance. Apart from these Article Process Charges, there are no submission charges, page charges, or color charges. The fees to be paid following the acceptance of an article are indicated in the table below:

Manuscript TypeAPC
Research Article550 USD
Review Article550 USD
Editorial Note   Free
Book ReviewFree
Note: There is additional USD 50 will be charged if any author willing to receive the hard copy of the journal after publication. 

Waivers or Discounts of APC
  1. For authors publishing in Conscientia Beam journals, Conscientia Beam offers waivers and discounts to authors on unavailability of funds, if the article is well written. 
  2. To ensure that editorial decisions are never influenced by ability to pay, it is Conscientia Beam policy that editors of Conscientia Beam journals are not involved in correspondence with authors regarding payment of Article Publication Charges (APC). 
  3. The granted waiver system will be managed by editorial office. 
Institutional Membership
If your institute is a member of the Conscientia Beam,  your APC could be discounted up to 10%. Please contact us at info@conscientiabeam.com to find out more information.

Refund Policy
Once an article has been accepted for publication, any Article Processing Charges on the article become due. The submitting author assumes responsibility for the Article Processing Charges, and Conscientia Beam will not issue refunds of any kind.

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Academic ethics are the necessary fundamental principle of research and the reputation. To promote academic integrity and publish high-quality research works, International Journal of Education and Practice (IJEP) issues the following Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement about the expected ethical behavior for all parties related to IJEP publication, including the author, the peer reviewer,  and the IJEP editor.
 

Publication and Authorship

  1. All the published papers should list the references and financial support according to IJEP  style.
  2. Forbidden plagiarism and fraudulent date.
  3. Forbidden to publish the same research in more than one journal
  4. Forbidden to publish the same research in different languages

Author’s Duty

  1. Original papers should report the work performed and the experiment data accurately, discuss its significance objectively, give experiment details enough to reproduce the research or experiment by others, and cite and list the references exactly according to the IJEP requirement and IJEP reference style. 
  2. Originality and plagiarism: Only entirely original papers can be submitted to IJEP. All the work or words of others should be cited or quoted appropriately. Plagiarism and fraudulent date papers will not be considered for publication by IJEP. 
  3. Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication: Papers should not be published in more than one journal. Submitting the same research in different languages and the under-review manuscripts to different journals are also unethical behavior, which are unacceptable by IJEP. 
  4. Sign the IJEP Copyright form and statement that all data in article are real and authentic.
  5. Authorship of the paper: All authors should have significantly contributed to the research.
  6. Participate in the peer review process
  7. Ethics of experimentation: Approval from the relevant body is required for the studies
  8. Disclosure and conflicts of Interest: All the financial support for the research should be disclosed.
  9. All authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  10. Acknowledgement of sources

Reviewers’ Responsibility

  1. Judgments should be objective. 
  2. Reviewers’ views should be expressed clearly with supporting arguments.
  3. Promptness is necessary. If the selected reviewer feels inadequate to review the paper or cannot promptly review the paper, the reviewer should inform the editor and drop out of the peer review process of the paper.
  4. Reviewers should have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors, and/or the research funders.
  5. Reviewers should point out relevant published work which is not yet cited.
  6. Reviewed articles should be treated confidentially.

Editorial Responsibilities

  1. Publication decisions: Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article. But this decision should only be based on the paper’s relevance to the journal’s scope and its academic quality, including the reviewers’ judgments, the research’s innovation, the experiment’s validity, etc. And only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  2. Confidentiality: Editors and the editorial staff should guarantee the confidentiality of the submitted papers which should be only disclose to the authors, the reviewers, the potential reviewers, the adviser from the IJEP Editorial Committee, and the publisher if necessary before publication. And the submitted papers should not be used for the editors’ and the editorial staff’s own research without the authors’ written authorization.  
  3. Editors should have no conflict of interest with respect to articles they reject/accept.
  4. Adhere to the double-blind review in the peer review process.
  5. Preserve anonymity of reviewers.
  6. When errors are found, promote publication of correction or retraction.

Publishing Ethics Issues

  1. No plagiarism and no fraudulent data.
  2. Plagiarism and fraudulent data are forbidden. When a case of plagiarism and fraudulent data is exposed after the paper’s publication in IJEP, a preliminary investigation will be conducted by IJEP. IJEP will also inform the author. The author could state the situation through IJEP official e-mail: info@conscientiabeam.com. If the plagiarism is confirmed, IJEP will contact the author’s institute and funding agencies. And IJEP will mark the plagiarism paper obviously on the PDF of this paper or formally retract the paper.
  3. Monitoring/safeguarding publishing ethics by editorial board.
  4. Crosscheck and double-blind peer review should be conducted for each paper to avoid academic misconduct. And all the files related to each paper should be kept properly.

Guidelines for Retracting Articles

  1. Retracting article will be considered if there is clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error), or if the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication), or if the paper constitutes plagiarism, or if the paper reports unethical research. 
  2. The main purpose of retractions is to correct the literature and ensure its integrity rather than to punish authors who misbehave.
  3. The retracted paper will not be removed from the IJEP online issues. But notices of retraction will be promptly published and linked to the retracted article, accurately stating the information of the retracted article, the reason(s) for retraction, and who retracts the article, which will be freely available to all readers.
  4. Articles may be retracted by their author(s) or by IJEP. In some cases, retractions are issued jointly. And IJEP has the final decision about retracting articles. IJEP will retract publications even if all or some of the authors refuse to retract the publication themselves if the unethical behavior is confirmed.

Maintain the Integrity of the Academic Record

  1. All the authors will make a commitment of the integrity of the academic record, including the integrity of the data and figures in the paper, when they sign the IJEP Copyright Form. And the crosscheck and peer review will help the editors to verify the originality and integrity of the submitted paper. 
  2. All the business needs should be precluded from compromising intellectual and ethical standards.
  3. Dealing with the fundamental errors. 
  4. When an author discovers fundamental errors in the published works, it is the author’s obligation to notify the editor promptly by e-mail. The editors and the editorial stuff should always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed.


Special Issues

Download Stastics