One of the major concerns is to do with the foundations, such as compressors, railroads, roads and so forth, which are under the influence of the static and dynamic loads. These foundations which have been affected by the traffic loads are regarded as uniform and differential settlements. Sometimes a number of pipes are laid under these foundations, thereby influencing the related settlements. In this study, it has been shown that an increase in the dynamic load when both the initial static load and the pipe depth are constant leads to an increase in the settlement. As compared to the ordinary condition, the amount of settlement is greater. Also, it was revealed that the amount of soil settlement is reduced by 54%, as compared with the unreinforced soil, considering that the initial static load and the pipe depth are constant, and that the dynamic load has been applied, and that the grid-anchor system has been used. This research has focused mainly on introducing an appropriate and unified strategy to improve soil behavior using the reinforcements, which reduce the soil settlement in these shallow foundations. In addition, this paper presents the equations for both reinforced and unreinforced soil under dynamic loading to prevent such complicated calculation involved in deformation analysis. According to these equations, calculation of the permanent settlement for each foundation with a given size on the grid-anchor reinforced sand with and without embedded pipe is feasible.
Arjomand, M.A., M.R. Abdi and S.A. Sadrnejad, 2009. Clay reinforcement using geogrid embedded in thin layers of sand. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 7(4): 224-235.
ASTM D3080 / D3080M-11, 2011. Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Boushehrian, A.H. and N. Hataf, 2008. Bearing capacity of ring footings on reinforced clay. In: Proce. 12th Conf. of Int. Assoc. for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), Goa, India. pp: 354-3551.
Boushehrian, A.H., N. Hataf and A. Ghahramani, 2011. Modeling of the cyclic behavior of shallow foundations resting on geomesh and grid-anchor reinforced sand. Geotextile and Geomembranes, 29(3): 242-248.
Boushehrian, J.H. and N. Hataf, 2003. Experimental and numerical investigation of the bearing capacity of model circular and ring footings on reinforced sand. Journal of Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 21(4): 241-256.
Bowels, J.E., 1997. Foundation analysis and design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bushehrian, A.H., M. Veiskarami and A. Vafamand, 2012. Numerical investigation of machine foundations on fiber concrete tunnel in reinforced sand. In: Proce 5th Int. Geomechanics Conference (IGC), Varna, Bulgaria. pp: 163-169.
Chakraborty, D. and J. Kumar, 2014. Bearing capacity of strip foundations in reinforced soils. International Journal of Geomechanics, 14(1): 45-58.
Das, B.M. and E.C. Shin, 1996. Laboratory model tests for cyclic load-induced settlement of a strip foundation clayey soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 14(3): 213-225.
Das, B.M. and E.C. Shin, 1999. Dynamic behavior of geogrid-reinforced sand. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 3(4): 91-99.
Gobel, C.H., U.C. Weisemann and R. Krischner, 1994. Effectiveness of a reinforcing geogrid in a railway subbase under dynamic loads. Geotextile and Geomembrane, 13(2): 91-99.
Hataf, N., A.H. Boushehrian and A. Ghahramani, 2010. Experimental and numerical behavior of shallow foundations on sand reinforced with geogrid and grid-anchor under cyclic loading. Sientia Iranica International Journal of Science and Technology, 17(1): 1-10.
Hataf, N. and A. Sadr, 2009. Pull-out behavior of an innovative grid-anchor system. In: Proce. 17th Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ICSMGE), Alexandrina, Egypt. pp: 909-912.
Ling, H.I. and Z. Liu, 2001. Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt pavements. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviromental Engineering, 127(2): 177-184.
Madhavi, L.G., A. Somwanshi and R. Harriprasad, 2013. A multiple rgression equation for prediction of bearing capacity of geosynthetic reinforced sand beds. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 43(4): 331-343.
Moghaddas, T.S.N. and A.R. Dawson, 2010. Comparison of bearing capacity of a strip footing supported on sand reinforced with 3D and with planar geotextile. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28(1): 72-84.
Moghaddas, T.S.N. and A.R. Dawson, 2010. Behavior of footings on reinforced sand subjected to repeated loading – comparing use of 3D and planar geotextile. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28(5): 434-447.
Moghaddas, T.S.N. and A.R. Dawson, 2012. A comparison of static and cyclic loading responses of foundations on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 32(2012): 55-68.
Mosallanezhad, M., N. Hataf and A. Ghahramani, 2007. Experimental study of bearing capacity of granular soils, reinforced with innovative grid-anchore system. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 25(1): 123-137.
Nazzal, N., M. Farsakhr and L. Mohamad, 2007. Laboratory characterization of reinforced crushed limestone under monotonic and cyclic loading. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19(9): 772-784.
PLAXIS2D Tunnel Scientific Manual, 2001. 2-dimensional finite element code for soil and rock analysis. A. A. Balkema Publishers.
PLAXIS3D Tunnel Scientific Manual, 2001. 3-dimensional finite element code for soil and rock analysis. A. A. Balkema Publishers.
Shin, E.C., D.H. Kim and B.M. Das, 2002. Geogrid-reinforced railroad bed settlement due to cyclic load. Journal of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 20(3): 261-271.
Smaili, D. and N. Hataf, 2013. Determination of ultimate load capacity of conical and pyramidal shell foundations using dimensional analysis. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transaction of Civil Engineering, 37(C+): 423-435.
Yeo, B., S.C. Yen, V.K. Puri, B.M. Das and M.A.A. Wright, 1993. A laboratory investigation into the settlement of a foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand due to cyclic load. Journal of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 11(1): 1-14.
This study received no specific financial support.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.