@Article{pakinsight,
AUTHOR = {},
TITLE = {The Right to Dignity and Consensus in the Psychiatric Health Treatment},
JOURNAL = {International Journal of Medical and Health Sciences Research},
VOLUME = {4},
YEAR = {2017},
NUMBER = {1},
PAGES = {1-11},
URL = {http://www.pakinsight.com/archive/9/01-2017/1},
ISSN = {2313-2752},
ABSTRACT = {Theoretical frameworks: Health workers in practice obtain the informed 
consent of the patient where there is an invasion of privacy. Health 
data are processed without consent, health treatment is carried out 
without informed consent, and is taken to the patient the possibility of
 an appeal, does not receive information about what to do and where to 
seek help, if necessary. Methods: Based on the long-term observation of 
conduct of healthcare workers, the analysis of legal acts and synthesis 
of statutory provisions for informed consent based arguments. Results 
Health workers against health interventions with greater impact on 
privacy and the integrity of the body does not obtain informed consent, 
offer a preprinted form. The patient is given an explanation focus, 
which is the duty doctor. Interpretation duty is not subject recording 
in health documentation which makes it impossible to trace back. 
Discussions Health professionals legislature requires compliance with 
legal rules, education in terms of knowledge of the law, it does not 
reach a satisfactory level. Health workers do not know the laws, and the
 patient's rights not exercised. In order to ensure the legal 
documentation is necessary to inform all health professionals with the 
laws and knowledge documentation.},
DOI = {10.18488/journal.9/2017.4.1/9.1.1.11}
}